Sunday, March 31, 2013

Men’s Wearhouse Falls on Q4 View

There’s apparently a problem selling men’s business attire. Men’s Wearhouse (MW) is down 15% after the company this evening reported Q3 sales and profitcomfortably ahead of estimates but forecast a sales decline this quarter and a deep per-share loss where analysts were expecting a profit.

Q3 revenue of $462 million was ahead of the average $454 million estimate, while profit per share of 37 cents beat by 4 cents. For the current quarter, however, the company sees sales decline “in the low single digits” versus an expected .9% decline, according to Thomson Reuters.

Men’s Wearhouse shares are now down $3.54, or 16%, at $18.30 after falling 1.5% during the regular session.

General Mills: A Safe Haven In This Economic Climate

As part of our process, we perform a rigorous discounted cash-flow methodology that dives into the true intrinsic worth of companies. In the case of General Mills (GIS), we think the firm is worth just under $40 per share. Our full reports on General Mills and hundreds of other companies are available on our website.

We think a comprehensive analysis of a firm's discounted cash-flow valuation, relative valuation versus industry peers, as well as an assessment of technical and momentum indicators is the best way to identify the most attractive stocks at the best time to buy. This process culminates in what we call our Valuentum Buying Index, which ranks stocks on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best.

The Best Ways to Play the Housing Rebound

Investors seeking smart plays in the housing rebound may want to check out the home improvement space.

Shares of Lumber Liquidators (NYSE: LL  ) hit new all-time highs this morning after delivering another strong quarter.

Net sales soared 21% to $210.7 million in the hardwood flooring retailer's fourth quarter, fueled by modest expansion but largely as a result of an exciting 13.2% spike in comparable-store sales. Comps rose as the number of customers invoiced at a typical store rose 9% and the average sale increased 4%.

With home prices finally starting to firm up and homeowners growing less worried about their mortgages going underwater, it's only natural to see an uptick in folks replacing scruffy carpeting with stylish hardwood planks.

The path down the income statement gets even better. Improving margins led to net income soaring 63% to $13.8 million or $0.50 a share. Analysts were only targeting a profit of $0.42 a share on $197.8 million in net sales.

The future is rosy. Lumber Liquidators has just 288 stores, and it sees a market that can support 600 locations. Margins will be challenged in 2013 as the company rolls out a new store format with an expanded showroom, but the retailer still sees net sales growing 9% to 13% with earnings per share climbing 13% to 28%.

Hit the deck
It's not just Lumber Liquidators impressing the market this week.

Shares of Trex (NYSE: TREX  ) soared 6% yesterday, hitting eight-year highs after a blowout quarterly report. The leading provider of wood-alternative decking may have posted an adjusted deficit of $0.13 a share and seen revenue dip 10% to $46.2 million, but the results were better than expected.

This is also a seasonal business. Folks don't start investing in a new or replacement outdoor deck until spring kicks in, and that's where the news is even more encouraging. Trex is targeting revenue of $107 million for the current quarter, ahead of the $105.8 million that Wall Street was projecting and a return to double-digit year-over-year growth.

Trex has grown by expanding its global presence. Its products have gone from being offered in just three countries in 2008 to 29 countries just five years later. The eco-friendly company has also grown by expanding its product lines across several price points.

It's a sound strategy that's clearly starting to pay off now that homeowners are comfortable enough to spruce up their homes again.

An army of orange aprons
Investors may not think about Trex and Lumber Liquidators when they embark on home improvement plays. The mainstream wagers will be Home Depot (NYSE: HD  ) and Lowe's (NYSE: LOW  ) , as the two superstore chains offer a way to play all aspects of the recovery. From gardening tools to lighting fixtures, the two leading "do it yourself" retailers offer a less concentrated way to play the rebound.

It's not the smart play here, though.

Analysts see Home Depot and Lowe's growing net sales at a mere 3% clip in this new fiscal year. Lumber Liquidators and Trex -- as specialists in popular improvement projects -- are growing considerably faster.

None of the four companies may seem cheap by the market's popular P/E measuring stick. Home Depot, Lowe's, and Trex are all trading at 19 times this new year's projected profitability. Lumber Liquidators -- as the speedster in the group -- is actually fetching more than 30 times the midpoint of this year's net income guidance.

It's not just about this year's growth rates. Traditional discount department store chains continue to expand their housewares and lawn centers.

We also can't forget about the Internet. While online retailers may be challenged in selling hefty dishwashers or offering same-day delivery of tarps after a roof-busting storm, cheaper dot-com pricing on thermostats and chandeliers will eat into the foot traffic at your local hardware store.

Sure, the "showrooming" effect won't be as hard on Home Depot and Lowe's as it will be on consumer electronics chains, but it will eat into sales.

Lumber Liquidators is a brick-and-mortar outfit too, but replacing living areas with hardwood requires more hand-holding than simply ordering a new garden hose.

Trex actually makes its own decking and related materials that it resells through several distributors, so it will hold up just fine.

Bet on the house
No matter where you stand on any of these four companies, the home improvement market will grow. There have been years of pent-up demand, and it's just now starting to get cooking.

The bank is less likely to foreclose on a home -- and homeowners are more likely to be current on their mortgage payments -- in a climate of rising prices and fewer underwater mortgages.

As homeowners grow more comfortable in the freedom to customize their properties, home improvement is a smarter bet than buying into the actual homebuilders, who will only benefit if the appetite for new construction accelerates.

Improve your home. Improve your portfolio.

Beyond housing
With the U.S. relying on the rest of the world for such a large percentage of our goods, many investors are ready for the end of the "made in China" era. Well, it may be here. Read all about�the biggest industry disrupters since the personal computer�in "3 Stocks to Own for the New Industrial Revolution."�Just�click here to learn more.

Crown Crafts: A Classic Free Cash Flow Generating Business

Business: Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS) engages in the design, marketing, and distribution of infant and toddler products in the United States and internationally. Its infant products include crib bedding, blankets, nursery accessories, room decor, bibs, burp cloths, bathing accessories, and other infant soft goods.

Free Cash Flow Generation (Data as of 2/25/2010)

Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Free Cash Flow (in millions) 5.1 6.4 2.8 5.9 7.3 11.0 2.5 8

Impressively, in no year did capital expenditures exceed $450 thousand.

From 2002-2009, total assets averaged $58.46 million.

From 2002-2009 Free Cash Flow averaged $6.13 million.

Therefore, we get an average Free Cash Flow ROA for the period of:

  • $6.13 million / $58.46 million = 10.48% (quite good)

At a $30 million market cap, CRWS is trading at:

  • 3.75X 2009's Free Cash Flow and 4.9X its 8 year average Free Cash Flow.

Management has been very diligent about paying down debt. Long-Term Debt was $36.8 million in 2002. In the latest quarter reported, Long-Term Debt stood at $1.784 million. On February 9, 2010 Crown Crafts' Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.02 a share. Revenue in the latest quarter reported was up 6.98%

It's always heart-warming to see old school, conservative management. CEO Randall Chestnut and his team really execute on the blocking and tackling of a well run enterprise.

For me, researching CRWS is always a pleasure. It was one of my first big winners, making me over 650% in less than two years during a restructuring in 2006-2007. I try to regularly keep up with their results. CEO Randall Chestnut is a fierce competitor. He was the right-hand man to David H. Murdock of Castle & Cook/Dole Foods (DOLE) fame at various textile companies which Murdock would take over and Chestnut would turn around.

After Chestnut became CEO of Crown Crafts, he shuttered money-losing units, moved manufacturing to Asia, slashed costs to the bone, aggressively paid down debt with cash flow, and recently made some accretive acquisitions at very shrewd EBITDA multiples. CRWS has a very lean cost structure that makes it a natural supplier to Wal-Mart (WMT), but a tough model for its competitors to emulate. Bottom line, the company has the cost advantages of Asian manufacturing combined with a seasoned U.S. management team which is as shrewd and honest as the day is long. It is quite a combination.

Strengths

  • Excellent Management

  • Lean Cost Structure

  • Free Cash Flow Generation

  • Strong Sourcing/Logistics

  • Shrewd Acquisitions

  • Primary Risks

  • Private Label Brands

  • Customer Concentration

  • Retail-Direct Licensing

  • Tough Competitive Environment

  • Asian Product Safety

  • Disclosure: No positions

    Culture City: The Art of Fishing for Attention

    Everybody wants attention. That's showbiz. So does that explain why Tilda Swinton was sleeping in a glass box at MoMA last week?

    Of course not. An Oscar-winning actress taking an eight-hour nap in the middle of one of the city's most important museums? Obviously, that's art.

    Or is it? To be clear, I'll fully admit that I didn't see "The Maybe," as the work is titled. Part of the project is based on Ms. Swinton appearing without notice.

    Enlarge Image

    Close Associated Press

    Actress Tilda Swinton napped in a glass box last week at MoMA for a piece called 'The Maybe.'

    Judging from the pictures and reports, I'm not sure I'd spend the time stalking the museum for her next appearance. Art doesn't always have to make a point, but "The Maybe" seems like it has one. What is it? To broaden our concept of portraiture? To make us think about celebrity differently? Maybe it elucidates "The Scream"?

    Ms. Swinton previously enacted this work in London's Serpentine Gallery in 1995, and then in Rome's Museo Barracco in 1996. At the Serpentine, Londoners were no mere onlookers. According to a report in the Times in September 1995, visitors repeatedly tried to wake her by tapping on the glass. One man showed up each day to read aloud his poetry. As the reporter noted, "She was unnerved by a man who tried waking her by screaming: 'Get up, you stupid cow.'"

    Enlarge Image

    Close NYCB

    The art collective Faile erected a tower of drawings at the New York City Ballet.

    Perhaps if Ms. Swinton were presented at MoMA in a show about the 1990s, the piece would register within the historical context of that decadent time. Wasn't that an era of contemporary art that ran parallel with the early Internet boom, back when foie gras was today's kale? Damien Hirst and the Young British Artists were going great guns. We had sharks in formaldehyde. We had fake pills on mirrored shelves. We had money.

    Enlarge Image

    Close Associated Press

    The Gotham Chamber Orchestra's production of the baroque opera 'Eliogabalo

    Plus, it looks like New York got only half "The Maybe" enchilada. In London, it was presented along with an assortment of objects purportedly related to famous individuals, such as Winston Churchill's cigar and a cushion from Sigmund Freud's office. A spokesperson for MoMA said these additional relics were not presented here.

    Maybe an actress sleeping in a box brings you closer to theater? There's no denying that her project calls on the craft of acting: sleeping in public can't be natural. But if you want to see a celebrity act, check out Tom Hanks's star turn in "Lucky Guy" at the Broadhurst Theatre.

    If "The Maybe" is truly meant to spark deep thoughts about celebrity and voyeurism within the museum context, it may do that. But so does reading People magazine in the MoMA cafe. If you want to connect with art, ditch the mag and walk around.

    MoMA is by no means alone in its quest for quick attention. Earlier this year, New York City Ballet invited the Brooklyn-based art collective Faile to erect a tower of comic book-style drawings in the theater's elegant promenade. The project was part of the NYCB Art Series, for which the ballet commissions contemporary artists and gives limited-edition art work to audience members.

    Here's my question: How does a giant tower of comics and a free sketch bring anyone closer to ballet? If you want to develop new ballet fans, why give them graphic art?

    Well, apparently it got people in seats. Or, at least the price did: Tickets to the Art Series performances (Feb. 1 and May 29) were just $29. According to City Ballet, both nights sold out in less than 24 hours, and 70% of the ticket buyers were new to the company.

    That is certainly encouraging news. But when I read the programming, I lurched for an oxygen mask faster than a Yankee fan reading the injury report. Of the eight pieces on these two programs, only one is by Balanchine: "Variations pour une Porte et un Soupir," an experimental duet that is possibly the most un-Balanchine work in the entire repertory. None of the eight is by Jerome Robbins. Two are by Peter Martins. The rest, with the exception of Christopher Wheeldon's "Polyphonia," are rarely performed.

    What happens when these social-media savants go back to the ballet (which I hope they do) and wind up at a program of "only" Balanchine and Robbins? Let's hope "Symphony in C"�one of Balanchine's masterpieces�works its magic.

    All this being said, there's one place where attention-trolling is working: the opera. Which is turning to sex. It could be gratuitous, but in recent cases it has been consistent with storytelling.

    In February, New York City Opera presented Thomas Ades's "Powder Her Face," which tells the scandalous story of Margaret Campbell, the Duchess of Argyll, who was accused by her husband of 88 extramarital affairs during their 1963 divorce. Maybe the production didn't technically need 25 naked men on the stage, but their presence did emphasize the mood.

    Next season, City Opera is presenting "Anna Nicole," an opera by Mark-Anthony Turnage in which the soprano singing the role of Anna-Nicole Smith wears a pair of fake, ridiculously oversized breasts. Necessary? Well, yes. As were, arguably, the heavily decorated codpieces in Gotham Chamber Orchestra's production of "Eliogabalo," a Baroque opera about a hedonistic Roman ruler. Presented at the Box last month, the production also included burlesque dancers with pasties.

    Meanwhile, in the Metropolitan Opera's new production of "Rigoletto," running through May 1, the second act takes place in and around a strip club. The pole dancer wears pasties only when the show is broadcast in HD. But hey, it's set in Las Vegas. So why not? It gets attention�for more right than wrong reasons.

    —email Pia at pia.catton@wsj.com

    Top Stocks For 1/26/2013-4

    TaxMasters, Inc. (TAXS.OB), the IRS tax relief company and a leading provider of tax representation services, improved its overall customer service response times in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the first quarter of 2010, while at the same time handling a 2 percent increase in customer call volume.

    “Many of our customers are feeling the heat from the IRS — some of them are facing wage garnishments and impending liens on their bank accounts, so we feel very strongly that we respond as quickly as we can,” said Renee Miller, VP of tax services at TaxMasters. “Not only did we install a new phone system, but we worked with our customer service teams to ensure that we had the best procedures in place allowing us to respond quickly and supply people with the services they need right away.”

    The national taxpayer advocate and USA Today reported in January 2010 that the most serious tax problem facing taxpayers is finding someone at the IRS to pick up the phone. In 2009, the IRS answered only 64 percent of calls after an average wait of over eight minutes. For the first six months of 2010, TaxMasters answered 94 percent of calls from existing clients with an average wait of only 23 seconds.

    After implementing a Cisco Unified Communications system in late 2009, TaxMasters can now more closely monitor its inbound and outbound call volumes. During the first quarter of 2010, 92.3 percent of existing TaxMasters clients who called the company spoke to a TaxMasters representative within 32 seconds.

    During the second quarter of 2010, 96 percent of existing TaxMasters clients who called the company spoke to a TaxMasters representative within 14 seconds, a 56 percent reduction in client wait time over the first quarter. This improvement in call answer time is especially significant because the total number of calls from existing clients was up 2 percent.

    Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. (NASDAQ:CIDM), the global leader in digital cinema, reported that the Telluride Film Festival has named Cinedigm as its official Digital Cinema Advisor. The Telluride Film Festival is an annual gathering of cinema enthusiasts, filmmakers, critics and industry insiders. It ranks among the world’s most prestigious film festivals. This year’s Festival will take place from September 3-6 in Telluride, Colorado.

    In its role as Digital Cinema Advisor, Cinedigm will help the Telluride Film Festival implement digital cinema systems for its theaters, including the Palm Theater, the Chuck Jones Cinema and the Galaxy Theater. Cinedigm will contribute strategic and technical advice relative to digital cinema, and will help the Festival identify the appropriate vendors necessary to transform the Festival into a digital venue.

    “We are thrilled to have Cinedigm join us in our commitment to excellence in film presentation,” said Julie Huntsinger, Tom Luddy and Gary Meyer, co-directors of the Telluride Film Festival. “We strive to provide an environment that showcases the most creative minds in film. Digital Cinema is a growing aspect of the industry’s future and Cinedigm’s unparalleled expertise in Digital Cinema is a huge asset for the Festival.”

    There are more than ten thousand digital cinema screens in the United States today, representing approximately 27 percent of all U.S. screens. Cinedigm estimates that by the end of 2012 at least 70 percent of U.S. screens will be digital. Digital cinema conversion has been underway for several years, but the past 12 months witnessed a spike that outpaced the previous five years combined. In part, this was driven by the success of digital filmmaking and the wave of successful 3D movies; James Cameron’s Avatar set multiple world records, and helped to show how seamlessly and beautifully digital technology could be incorporated into movies.

    TechTarget, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTGT) recently launched SearchDataManagement.co.uk, a comprehensive, problem-solving website for UK-based and English-speaking European enterprise information technology (IT) and business professionals who lead their companies� data management (DM) and business intelligence (BI) efforts.

    Launching with 63,000 members, SearchDataManagement.co.uk is TechTarget�s fourth UK-targeted website and reflects the company�s investment in its international audiences as well as the business intelligence market. TechTarget delivers prospects to sponsors that are both focused on a particular IT sub-market and in the geographies that technology companies care about.

    SearchDataManagement.co.uk joins TechTarget�s leading portfolio of business intelligence market websites that include Search Data Management.com, SearchBusinessAnalytics.com and the BeyeNETWORK, which have already earned the sponsorship of many leading business intelligence vendors. SearchDataManagement.co.uk covers all aspects of data management and analytics, from business intelligence, reporting and performance management to database management, data warehouses, architecture, integration, data quality, master data management, infrastructure and more.

    �We are excited to add SearchDataManagement.co.uk to TechTarget�s lineup of data management and business intelligence-focused websites,� said Mike Bolduc, Publisher of TechTarget�s Enterprise Applications Media. �We�ve seen real demand from BI and DM decision-makers for more specific content that is tuned to their particular needs, and we know that vendors in the market want to find the best prospects to drive their country-specific operations in Europe,� continued Bolduc.

    How J.C. Penney Is Killing Itself

    In the following video, we speak with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean�of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss what Martin believes is J.C. Penney's fundamental strategic flaw, the fact that it's competing against itself with the new "store within a store" concept, and why he believes the company is doomed to fail.

    A transcript follows the video.

    The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics, including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the co-author of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy, written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

    If you're on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

    Brendan Byrnes:�You know a thing or two about strategy, having helped turn around Procter & Gamble. I wanted to ask you about Bill Ackman and J.C. Penney. You wrote in a blog post recently that "Bill Ackman shows almost no evidence of understanding enough about strategy to turn around a company." What's he doing wrong?

    Roger Martin: Well, I think he understands a whole lot about capital markets and a whole lot about how to make investors happy, but I'm not sure he knows how to make consumers -- customers -- happy in a way that brings about competitive advantage.

    What I see with J.C. Penney is sort of a fallacy that I see often in the strategy of companies, which is that it's good enough to try to improve things. It's not. Improving is good, but only in the context of having a goal to have an advantage against competitors with some set of customers so that customers say, "I need this company."

    If you just improve a company, you say, "I'm going to get their inventory turns up, or their sales per square foot up." That ends up often disappointing. I think that's, in some sense, what's happening at J.C. Penney.

    They just announced a huge fourth-quarter loss. Same-story sales were down almost 30% in 2012, but the focus has been on, "Oh, we've got the new J.C. Penney" -- 10% of the stores are this new store within a store, and it's double the sales per square foot of the rest of J.C. Penney -- "so as soon as we get the stores converted over to 100% of this our sales per square foot," which were 130 apparently, and are 260 within the little store-within-a-store new J.C. Penney, "everything will be fine."

    But that begs the question, "Who are you competing against?" I would argue that right now, the new J.C. Penney is competing against and absolutely slaughtering an important competitor, and it's called the old J.C. Penney.

    The only way that sales per square foot can be up in the new J.C. Penney, that 10%, by that much, and sales per square foot for the store overall are down that much, is what? They're taking huge, huge amounts of sales away from the old J.C. Penney.

    In due course, once they've destroyed the old J.C. Penney and got its sales per square foot down to zero, they're going to have to start taking share from somebody else. What I don't see is evidence that they have that in their mind, which is, "How are we going to beat Macy's, Nordstrom, Target," all the companies that one way or another they compete against.

    That's strategy, having a where to play, how to win against competitors other than yourself.

    Byrnes: J.C. Penney definitely has a strategy problem. Even bigger than that, it just seems like with declining mall traffic it's kind of an industry problem to some extent, although some of the other guys are doing much better, obviously -- Nordstrom and Macy's, you mentioned.

    Can J.C. Penney survive with the competition from those big boys, and can they turn it around based on strategy?

    Martin: I think you can always have a strategy to win in a certain way in a certain place. This is a particularly tough one, but the key is that without a strategy. I think the turnaround is actually doomed to fail.

    More Expert Advice from The Motley Fool J.C. Penney has been a train wreck whose comeback always seems just around the next earnings corner, but people are beginning to doubt if CEO Ron Johnson can weave the same magic that he did at Apple. For investors wondering whether J.C. Penney is a buy today, you're invited to claim a copy of The Motley Fool's new must-read report on the company. Learn everything you need to know about JCP's turnaround - or lack thereof - and as an added bonus, you'll receive a full year of expert guidance and updates as key news develops. Simply click here now for instant access.

    Is EA the Worst Company in America?

    Electronic Arts hasn't been winning any friends with its customer-service snafus recently, and the shoddy behavior has landed the company in The Consumerist's bracket for "The Worst Company In America" -- yet again.

    But the real question is how this poor sentiment translates to investor returns. In the following video, Jeremy Phillips and Austin Smith reflect on what the poor service means for shareholders, and their conclusions aren't good.

    While Activision Blizzard and Microsoft have been taking the headlines when it comes to console gaming, Electronic Arts has been languishing. If you're wondering how to play the new landscape of gaming, we can help. Our new special report breaks down the risks and opportunities facing the company to help you decide whether EA is right for your portfolio. Click here to get your copy now.

    Why Pandora Will Never Be a Great Investment

    In the following video, Jeremy Phillips and Austin Smith discuss the future of Pandora.

    Jeremy calls the company a "dumb pipe" that doesn't own its content, all while it goes up against Apple and Amazon.com, which have billions of dollars to play with as they seek to build on their market shares.

    Austin notes that those two companies are willing to sustain losses in this business -- Apple for the sake of further developing its products' ecosystems -- and says there may be no winner in this market at all, as there are no economies of scale and costs keep rising. Even worse for Pandora is that it has no intellectual property, leaving its business ripe for disruption.

    For more details, check out the video.

    Pandora has won millions of devotees among music fans but few supporters on Wall Street. The online jukebox seems to be redefining the way we consume music, a transformation that�s only likely to grow. But high royalty rates and competition from all corners threatens to silence the company. Can Pandora translate success with its listeners into a prosperous business model that will deliver for investors? Learn about the key opportunities and potential pitfalls facing the upstart radio streamer in The Motley Fool's new premium research report. All you have to do is click here now to subscribe to this invaluable investor's resource.

    An Excuse to Sell?

    In our Week in Review newsletter released every Friday to Bespoke Premium clients, we provide sparklines of the S&P 500 and its ten sectors along with where they are trading relative to their normal trading ranges (one standard deviation above and below the 50-DMA). In this format, viewers can quickly and easily see where each sector stands relative to other sectors and itself over the last year.

    Heading into this week, the S&P 500 and seven of its ten sectors are trading at overbought levels, while no sectors are oversold. The Industrials sector is currently more overbought than at any other point in the last year. As we have seen since last March, overbought markets can stay overbought for several days or weeks. It isn't until an event occurs that gives the market an excuse to sell-off that the correction comes. We saw this in late November with the Dubai debt concerns as well as in late January when Washington proposed strict new taxes and legislation towards the Financial sector and Greece ran into debt trouble. In each case these concerns blew over and the market rallied after brief pullbacks.

    Today, the market finds itself in a similar situation with the passage of health care reform. The market has known that a bill could and likely would pass for some time, and the market has rallied in the face of this. We don't see yesterday's vote as marking the end of the bull market, but with markets as overbought as they are, it could give investors an excuse to sell.

    click to enlarge

    Sprint: Bernstein Ups to Hold; Still an Ugly Market for Cellular

    Sprint-Nextel (S) this afternoon receives its second upgrade of the day following its $12.1 billion deal with Japan‘s Softbank, with Bernstein Research‘s Craig Moffett raising his rating on the shares to Market Perform from Underperform, and raising his price target to $6 from $3.

    Moffett’s upgrade follows one by by Jefferies & Co. this morning, to Hold from Underperform.

    Sprint shares today fell 4 cents or $5.69. Shares of partner Clearwire (CLWR) surged 37 cents, or 16%, to $2.69.

    Argues Moffett, the deal leaves Sprint much better capitalized, with an $8 billion cash infusion now taking the risk of bankruptcy from “genuine” to “de minimus.”

    And the deal is “substantially more attractive than the status quo for current sprint shareholders,” writes Moffett, as he does his back-of-the-envelope calculation of deal valuation:

    For every 100 shares of Sprint investors own today, 55 will be redeemed for $7.30 in cash (well above market), and the remaining 45 will be in the recapitalized company. As such, Sprint’s stock price should reflect a weighted average of the two values. Simplistically using $7.30 per share as a stock price, as has been cited in some press reports, is not correct. If one believes the new Sprint is worth, say, $6 per share, the warranted stock price today would equate to $6.00 times 45% plus $7.30 times 55%, or $6.72 per share (ignoring any probability of the deal breaking, and ignoring the time value of discounting the cash component back to the present). Alternatively, one can use the same ratios to back into the implied valuation post-tender. At the current price of $5.66 (at the time of this writing), the market is embedding a price of about $3.66 for Sprint on an ongoing basis, calculated as $5.66 less ($7.30 times 0.55) divided by 0.45.

    However, the deal also leaves Sprint in a more competitive environment, with heavy investment, thinks Moffett, as “will be an aggressive pricer, and capital intensity will rise substantially as SoftBank invests to fix what Son describes as the U.S.’s “oh my God” slow speeds.”

    Aside from additional liquidity, however, from an operational perspective little changes by virtue of having a new controlling shareholder and less leverage. Sprint will have more flexibility to acquire spectrum, invest in the network, or perhaps acquire assets, and when combined with SoftBank the companies will have greater purchasing power and an improved ability to prop up the TD-LTE ecosystem. But its ability to be more competitive rests on spending the money it has received, the ROIC of which is questionable and undoes some of the benefits of lower leverage.

    Previously:
    Sprint: Credit Suisse, BTIG Size up Clearwire Potential, October 15th, 2012.

    Why Ulta Salon Shares Were Pummeled

    Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

    What: Shares of beauty products retailer Ulta Salon (NASDAQ: ULTA  ) tumbled as much as 13%, after announcing the resignation of its CEO Chuck Rubin, and receiving a downgrade from Credit Suisse.

    So what: Ulta Salon made the announcement earlier today that Chuck Rubin would be stepping down as CEO of more than two years in order to join Michaels Stores. Rubin's resignation comes just four months after chief financial officer, Bruce Hartman, resigned, as well. Without a long-term CEO and CFO currently in place, Credit Suisse downgraded Ulta Salon to "neutral" from "outperform" on that near-term uncertainty. Ulta Salon, in order to stem the negativity, also reported its preliminary fourth-quarter results, which include a 30% rise in revenue, to $757 million, an 8% jump in same-store sales, and EPS in the range of $0.96 to $0.98. Wall Street had been projecting revenue of $752.7 million, and $0.98 in EPS.

    Now what: Although beauty supply products are usually resistant to economic swings, I have to admit that both Ulta's valuation (forward P/E of 26), and its lack of a long-term solution at CEO and CFO, do make it somewhat of a gamble at these levels. If Ulta's growth continues to be noticeably slow, then there could be further downside still to come.

    Craving more input? Start by adding Ulta Salon to your free and personalized Watchlist so you can keep up on the latest news with the company.

    3 retailers worth keeping your eye on
    The retail space is in the midst of the biggest paradigm shift since mail order took off at the turn of last century. Only those most forward-looking and capable companies will survive, and they'll handsomely reward those investors who understand the landscape. You can read about the 3 Companies Ready to Rule Retail in our special report. Uncovering these top picks is free today; just click here to read more.

    The Magic Formula for Beverages

    If you're a busy investor with more than just stock-picking on your plate, you might want to consider a mechanical investing strategy. And if you're interested in stocks, one of the most intriguing of these strategies is Joel Greenblatt's Magic Formula.

    Greenblatt details this approach in his enriching, funny The Little Book That Beats the Market. His strategy revolves around two factors:

    • How cheap is the stock?
    • How profitable is the company?

    This simplified approach really boils down value investing to its essence. When you find a company whose price fails to reflect its high profits, you might have a winner.

    A cheap business and a profitable company
    To find cheap companies, the Magic Formula looks for a high earnings yield -- basically, a company's EBIT divided by its enterprise value. EBIT is earnings before interest and taxes, otherwise known as operating earnings. Enterprise value includes the company's market capitalization, then adds its net debt. In general, the higher the earnings yield, the better. The Magic Formula looks for a yield higher than 10%.

    To find profitable companies, Greenblatt's Magic Formula seeks businesses that generate pre-tax returns on assets greater than 25%. In other words, for every $100 in assets it holds, the company would produce at least $25 in net profit. In general, the higher the ROA, the better the business. Greenblatt looks for companies with an ROA higher than 25%.

    So how do some of the biggest companies in beverages fare?

    Company

    Enterprise Value

    EBIT

    Earnings Yield

    ROA

    Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO  ) $164,540 $10,114 6.1% 12.4%
    PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP  ) $124,202 $10,103 8.1% 13.4%
    Anheuser-Busch InBev (NYSE: BUD  ) $138,751 $11,929 8.6% 10.2%
    Ambev (NYSE: ABV  ) $97,323 $5,838 6.0% 24.0%
    Diageo (NYSE: DEO  ) $64,907 $4,225 6.5% 13.3%
    FEMSA (NYSE: FMX  ) $24,890 $1,753 7.0% 9.8%
    Coca-Cola FEMSA $16,619 $1,347 8.1% 14.7%
    Brown-Forman $11,835 $820 6.9% 22.3%
    Coca-Cola Enterprises $10,254 $1,012 9.9% 10.8%
    Hansen Natural (Nasdaq: HANS  ) $7,605 $433 5.7% 35.5%

    Source: S&P Capital IQ.

    Going by the Magic Formula criteria, none of these companies meets both standards, but Coca-Cola FEMSA just touches our desired 10% earnings yield and Hansen Natural exceeds our desired 25% ROA.

    Coca-Cola provides several features that should be attractive to conservative investors because of the strong brand loyalty it commands and its growth opportunities in emerging markets. The company also offers a stable 2.8% dividend, which is nice in an environment where you can't always count on capital gains.

    However, Coca-Cola's dividend is significantly lower than those offered by other giant beverage companies. For example, PepsiCo offers a 3.2% dividend and Dr Pepper Snapple offers a 3.4% dividend.

    Anheuser-Busch InBev also offers several characteristics that should be attractive to conservative investors. It pays a 2% dividend yield that is supported by growth in its revenue and free cash flow over the past few years. The biggest worries include debt concerns that arose after Anheuser-Busch merged with InBev and its ability to continue to grow in the face of competition from increasingly popular craft beer companies such as Boston Beer.

    Foolish bottom line
    The key advantage of the Magic Formula is speedy decision-making. You can run a screen and mechanically buy the stocks, then spend your free time doing the activities you love. However, such an approach means that you need to pick a lot of stocks (say, 25 or 30), since you haven't performed any strategic analysis of your investments. According to the formula, you should hold the stocks for one year in order to receive favorable tax treatment, sell all of them, and then run the screen again to find your new picks.

    While this approach sounds easy, Greenblatt cautions that it can be tough to stick with during hard times. In some years, this mechanical strategy simply won't work. However, Greenblatt's extensive backtesting suggests that over the long haul, his Magic Formula can significantly outperform the market.

    Interested in adding any of these companies to our watchlist? Click on the links below:

    • Add PepsiCo to My Watchlist.
    • Add Coca-Cola�FEMSA to My Watchlist.
    • Add Coca-Cola to My Watchlist.
    • Add Hansen�Natural to My Watchlist.
    • Add FEMSA to My Watchlist.
    • Add Diageo to My Watchlist.
    • Add Coca-Cola�Enterprises to My Watchlist.
    • Add Anheuser-Busch�InBev to My Watchlist.
    • Add Brown-Forman to My Watchlist.
    • Add Ambev to My Watchlist.

    IG Group Holdings Revenues Up 18%

    LONDON --�Shares in�IG Group� (LSE: IGG  ) �shot up 8% in early trade this morning to reach 565.50 pence, following the announcement of the firm's positive third-quarter figures.

    Revenue was ahead in all regions, as total revenue increased 18% to 88.6 million pounds in Q3 FY2013 compared to 75.1 million pounds in the same period last year. Highlights include the U.K. seeing a rise of 15%, while the faster-growing regions of Europe and Rest of World both performed admirably at +22% and +51% respectively.

    The second key performance metric, revenue per client, saw boosts across the board as well,�totaling�a 14% increase. The U.K. saw a 16% boost, while Rest of World soared to a 24% uplift.

    This was enhanced by a relatively weak comparative quarter in Q3 FY2012, while management also pointed toward increased activity across the business as client sentiment improved in what was a very strong year overall. The financial derivatives trading company saw stronger equity markets particularly around�the U.K.'s credit rating downgrade as well as the fiscal cliff negotiations in the U.S.

    Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, IG�Group is "mindful of the strength of the final quarter of the last year and the fact that a degree of uncertainty exists around consumer sentiment more broadly," despite its market leadership positions, cost discipline and strong balance sheet leaving it very well positioned for continuing growth.

    The shares have been somewhat on a run�recently, soaring from 497 pence at the beginning of March to put on 68 pence in less than two weeks. IG�Group appears to thrive in uncertain economies, having seen recent boosts in particular from intra-day volatility in the major indices -- add in the current yield of 4.3%, and it could be a decent prospect as an income share.

    Here at The Motley Fool, our top analysts have compiled an�exclusive in-depth report�about another high-income opportunity in the FTSE 100. The blue chip in question offers a 5.7% income,�might be worth 850 pence�versus around 740 pence now -- and has just been declared the "Motley Fool's Top Income Stock For 2013!"�Just�click here�to download the report -- it's absolutely free.

    Saturday, March 30, 2013

    Jim Rogers Still Bullish on Commodities

    Wait for it. Jim Rogers is... *gasp* bullish on commodities still! Now, who would have ever guessed that?! On a serious note, he still is adamant that 1999 was the start of the commodity bull market and he is bullish on the prospects. What's interesting is that he fully admits it will be a bubble at some point, but he's not worried about that right now as that's a 'way's off.' This interview comes after we saw Rogers recently start some short positions as he wagers the market is overdue for a correction.

    Of course he also thinks gold is going up and he expects it to be at $2,000 at least by the end of this decade, if not higher. In the past we've posted up plenty of hedge fund research on gold, all of which we recommend checking out. He recently sat down with Bloomberg to discuss his most recent thoughts on April 7th. If you come to the site, below you'll find an embedded video of his quick interview:

    So, he'll continue to ride the longer term trend that he feels is intact here. Rogers isn't a big believer in market timing and he'll gladly wait out the trend over the long-term. We check in on Rogers from time to time just to see what he's saying, but he appears in the media quite often, reiterating a lot of his views anyway. Keep in mind that Rogers and George Soros previously managed the highly successful Quantum Fund and have since gone their separate ways. Head over to see Rogers' recent rationale for starting short positions as well as our coverage of George Soros' hedge fund portfolio.

    original post

    Price tag for raising a kid: $235,000

    NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Raising a child just got $8,000 more expensive.

    Middle-income families with a child born in 2011 can expect to spend $235,000 over 17 years, according to a new report by the United States Department of Agriculture. That cost factors in food, shelter and other necessities to raise a child, and does not account for inflation.

    It also marks a whopping $8,000 increase, or 3.5% rise, in just one year.

    So why do babies born in 2011 cost so much more?

    In that one year alone, expenses for transportation, child care, education and food surged for middle-income families. Health care, clothing and housing costs also increased, but at a more gradual pace.

    In the study, the government defined middle-income families as those with $59,000 to $103,000 in annual income before taxes.

    Lower income families can expect to spend less -- to the tune of about $169,000 over 17 years and higher income families can expect to spend more -- roughly $390,000.

    The USDA has been estimating the cost of raising a child since 1960. The first year the report was issued, the agency estimated it cost an average of $25,000 (or roughly $192,000 adjusted for inflation) to raise a child to age 17. 

    Are Pensions Dead?

    Fifty years ago, an employee's last working day looked something like this: a company party filled with cake, balloons, and a ceremony with some kind words from the boss for "a job well done for 40 years of dedicated service," accompanied by a gold watch, a pat on the back, and a room full of smiles.

    But the biggest smile of all was on the face of the retiree. Not only did he know that he'd never have to set his alarm clock again, but he also knew he'd receive a check in the mail, which he could set that gold watch to, for every single month until the day he died. But those days are nearly over.

    Not your grandfather's pension
    Pensions have become a much smaller piece of Americans' retirement savings mix over the past several decades. Specifically, during the past 15 years, employers have shifted their retirement offerings for new employees away from the traditional pension plan your grandpa probably received. In 1985, 89 Fortune 100 companies offered a traditional defined benefit, or pension, plan to newly hired salaried workers. Today only 11 companies on the Fortune 100 list offer such as traditional pension plan. Meanwhile, defined contribution plans -- think 401(k)s -- have become the norm.

    We can chalk up the main reason for the trend to simple dollars and cents. Increased life expectancy, persistently low interest rates, and amplified stock market volatility are all working against traditional pension plans. In addition, many corporate plans must now dig themselves out of massive pension deficits because of not enough money pumped into the plan, coupled with poor planning and flawed assumptions. Put simply, companies don't want the exposure on their balance sheets and the drag on their bottom lines.

    In fact, during the most recent earnings season, both Ford (NYSE: F  ) and Goodyear Tire and Rubber (NASDAQ: GT  ) disclosed gaping pension shortfalls. In fact, last year alone, Ford�s pension deficit widened by a cavernous 21%. Goodyear contributed nearly $650 million to its plan in 2012, up from a $233 million contribution in 2011. Yet its plan's funded status is in the hole an extra $400 million versus one year ago. Meanwhile, UPS (NYSE: UPS  ) reported a fourth-quarter 2012 loss, resulting in part from a $3 billion non-cash pension-related accounting charge. The company faces a $225 million rise in pension costs for 2013.�

    Pensions getting pink slips
    But some companies are putting the ax to their pension plans. In an effort to ease its burden, Ford recently offered pension buyouts to roughly 100,000 qualifying former workers and retirees who held white-collar positions with the Detroit automaker. And last year, General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) offloaded a large chunk of its liabilities to insurer Prudential Financial (NYSE: PRU  ) , trimming its pension liabilities by more than $25 billion. By no means did this move completely shuck all of GM�s obligations off the books, but it significantly eliminated a big drag on the automaker�s bottom line.

    What employees want
    A 2010 survey showed that 84% of Americans think it's time for new and improved workplace retirement plans. That's a lot of disgruntled employees. But unfortunately, an overwhelmingly large number of employees have a difficult time planning for their own retirements. According to a recent study conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute, "Fifty-seven percent of U.S. workers reported that they have less than $25,000 in total household savings and investments, excluding their homes." As a result, we're woefully underprepared for retirement.

    In the end, people want piece of mind that they'll have more dollars than heartbeats. Traditional pension plans of yesteryear gave the security of knowing you'd receive guaranteed income for life. That's any worker's dream come true. But these days, having a traditional pension plan doesn't carry the same sense of security it once did. Instead, the responsibility falls squarely on each of us to plan and save for our own retirements.

    Worried about Ford?
    If you're concerned that Ford's turnaround has run its course, relax -- there's good reason to think that the Blue Oval still has big growth opportunities ahead. We've outlined those opportunities in detail, in the Fool's premium Ford research service. If you're looking for some freshly updated guidance to Ford's prospects in coming years, you've come to the right place -- click here�to get started now.

    Allscripts: Turnaround in medical records


    Allscripts (MDRX) is a leading provider of electronic record-keeping and practice management systems to doctors, hospitals, and various other health care providers.

    After a prolonged fainting spell, the company is now getting the right treatment for a robust recovery, and we�re adding it to Small-Cap Portfolio.

    The company struggled last year attempting to integrate products from a big acquisition, while customers balked at making purchases ahead of expected rollouts of new products and product upgrades.

    Analysts cut their earnings expectations, and the shares dropped some 50 percent. But now a turnaround is well underway.

    Allscripts had considered several options to maximize shareholder value, including shopping itself to private equity firms. In the end, though, after management and boardroom shake-ups, it remained a public entity, with greatly improved prospects.
    One significant change was the installation of a new and capable CEO, Paul Black, former chief operating officer of rival healthcare software company Cerner, which grew rapidly under his tenure. Black�s hiring was the latest in a string of management changes that have brightened the company�s outlook.

    Earlier, the chairman of the board was ousted and three other board members resigned in protest. Allscripts� chief financial officer and other executives likewise resigned.

    With the turmoil resolved, the company is focusing on growing the business again. It�s notable that over the past year, Allscripts did not lose a single major customer. That�s important since nearly two-thirds of revenue comes from recurring sources.

    Now the company has begun to introduce new products incorporating technology applicable to a range of healthcare organizations. This should help drive new and recurring sales going forward.

    One particular area for growth is small medical practices. Currently only about two-thirds of family doctors use electronic record-keeping. That figure should grow substantially.

    To speed the rollout of e-records, the Obama administration has put in place generous incentives that eventually will be replaced by penalties for providers that do not adopt electronic record-keeping.

    International sales are another potential growth area, since currently Allscripts generates nearly all of its sales and profits in the U.S. According to one recent survey, spending on information technology is the top priority for European hospitals. Allscripts stands to capture a decent share of that market.

    This year, we expect Allscripts to earn around 80 cents a share (up 13 percent from 2012), with profit growth averaging 15 percent a year over the next five years.

    The shares trade at a substantial discount both to competitors� valuations and to expected growth. If the new management team rights the ship, as we expect, look for that valuation gap to narrow, resulting in a healthy gain for the stock. MDRX is a buy up to $12.



    Related articles
    • DRIP expert picks J&J
    • Centene: Breakout in Medicaid?
    • Omega: A healthy REIT
    • Heart-felt buys: 3 cardiovascular plays

    Facebook: Big Impact From Gay-Marriage Campaign

    Same-sex marriage supporters demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court on March 27, 2013 in Washington.

    By Neal Mann

    Facebook said the number of people changing their profile pictures on the service more than doubled on Tuesday from normal levels, a sudden bump it attributed to agay-marriage campaign going viral.

    The HRC logo

    Facebook said roughly 2.7 million more users changed their profile pictures this past Tuesday than on an average Tuesday. Put another way, the number of people changing their photo was 120% the usual level.

    Facebook didn�t disclose the actual number of profile photo changes Tuesday or the average.

    Data collected by the social media site showed the increase in uploads began at the same time Human Rights Campaign,�a civil-rights organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans, urged its followers to change their avatars to show support.

    The organization’s traditional emblem of two yellow stripes on a blue background was changed to red, the color being worn and used by supporters of gay marriage.

    In true internet tradition, as the original HRC image went viral among supporters, users quickly adapted it. The image was reproduced using everything from food to clothing.

    Below, a sampling of adaptations of the logo.

    [View the story "Gay Marriage Symbol Goes Viral, A Meme Is Born" on Storify]

     

    Data That Every Utica Shale Investor Needs to Know About

    The Utica shale may not ring any bells for the average investor. But, utter that name around energy industry professionals, and you're sure to rouse a lively debate.

    An up-and-coming shale oil and gas play, the Utica stretches across Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia,�though drilling to date has centered primarily in Ohio. Due to some major similarities with Texas' highly productive Eagle Ford play, energy companies are buzzing about the play.

    Unfortunately, however, relatively very little is known about the Utica's true potential due to Ohio's lack of transparency in reporting production data. But, for those who have invested in companies with major operations in the Utica, especially those more leveraged to the play like Gulfport Energy (NASDAQ: GPOR  ) , Rex Energy, and Magnum Hunter Resources (NYSE: MHR  ) , new, soon-to-be-released data should provide a much better glimpse into the play's potential.

    Next month, the state of Ohio will publish a comprehensive report detailing the Utica's well results for 2012. These results are sure to have major repercussions for the handful of companies that have plowed millions of dollars into the play.

    Let's take a closer look at why Ohio has been so secretive, the specifics of the data it will soon reveal, and implications for some of the Utica's major drillers.

    Limited production data and regulatory constraints
    Currently, Ohio state regulators request Utica operators to disclose production statistics only on an annual basis, whereas virtually every other state in the country publicly discloses production statistics and drilling data on a quarterly basis.

    Moreover, major drillers in the Utica have only disclosed information about half of their producing wells in the Utica, according to an analysis by Reuters. In addition, much of the data is limited, and drillers aren't required by law to release results on a per-well basis.

    As Reuters highlighted, lawmakers last year were pushing to include a clause within a new energy bill that would have required Utica producers operating in Ohio to publicly release energy production statistics on a quarterly basis.

    But, following discussions with oil and gas industry executives, lawmakers rejected the inclusion of the clause. In fact, the new law actually prevented Ohio's government from releasing the quarterly production data it obtains from Utica producers operating in the state.

    Crucial data to watch
    At any rate, the time is upon us for that annual data to finally be publicly disclosed. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources (DNR) announced that it will be publishing a comprehensive report next month that will include new data from Ohio's oil and gas wells.

    Producers operating in the Ohio Utica are required to submit production data to the department on March 31, information which it will subsequently make available on its website in April. Though the department did not provide a specific date, it published the data last year on April 2.

    The information provided will include only those wells that produced hydrocarbons in 2012, which equates to roughly between 50 and 60 wells. That's a lot more data than last year, when the DNR published production data from only five wells.

    Interestingly, that sparse collection of data is the only information officially disclosed by the state since drilling began in 2011, though several producers have provided production data for individual test wells.

    That just goes to show you how important the new information will be; its release is sure to be closely watched by traders, investors, and the industry at large. Specifically, the new report will include data on output over the lifetime of each well, as well as other important information such as the well's location and operator.

    Companies to keep an eye on
    The company that has the biggest presence in the Utica is Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK  ) , which discovered the play in 2010. As it stands, Chesapeake remains the Utica's largest leasehold owner, boasting approximately 1 million net acres. Though the company recently said it no longer views the Utica as central to reaching its oil production target, it obviously still has a major stake in the play.

    Other lesser-known players include Gulfport Energy and Magnum Hunter Resources. Gulfport, which boasts about 128,000 net acres�in the play, owes a debt of gratitude to the Utica. Ever since it announced having drilled its first three Utica wells back in June of last year, its share price has skyrocketed by nearly 200%.�Encouraged by high peak rates for its wells, the company remains highly optimistic about the Utica's potential.

    Magnum Hunter, which closed on an acquisition last month that boosted its acreage position to a little over 61,000 net�acres, is also bullish on the Utica's future. Though it hasn't drilled any wells in the Utica yet, despite entering the play in 2010, it plans to drill at least four Utica wells this year�with expectations for further development based on those initial well results. It won't have any well results listed in the DNR report next month, but the performance of its upcoming test wells will be interesting to track.

    Final thoughts
    When production data is revealed next month, investors would be wise to keep an eye on Chesapeake and Gulfport's results, as well as results for Anadarko, Rex Energy, and CONSOL Energy, among other Utica drillers. The data should offer investors a better understanding of which zones are likely to be most productive going forward, and which companies are most aptly positioned in the play's most lucrative regions.

    Chesapeake may have scaled back its expectations about the Utica's oil potential. But it still has several core holdings to help it transition away from natural gas production and toward oil. Will the company manage to meet its oil production target and boost cash flow? Or will it languish under the weight of its heavy debt load? To answer that question, and to learn more about Chesapeake and its enormous potential, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's brand-new premium report on the company. Simply click here now to access your copy, and as an added bonus, you'll receive a full year of key updates and expert guidance as news continues to develop.

    Home Depot and Housing Bring Down the Dow

    Stock markets have recovered from early losses and are now close to breaking even on the day. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) is now down just 0.22%, and the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC  ) has fallen 0.11%.

    The pessimism this morning involved concerns in Europe and a 0.4% decline in pending home sales in February. The National Association of Realtors said its pending-home-sales index fell to 104.8, which was still up more than 8% from a year ago. Housing is a big part of the economic recovery, and even one bad reading can put investors in a bad mood.

    The housing data has Home Depot (NYSE: HD  ) down 0.7%, today but the stock is still within striking distance of its 52-week high. What we should really be looking at is the long-term growth in the housing industry instead of the month-to-month gyrations. It's this long-term growth that has sent Home Depot higher and what will drive it in the future as well.

    Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) has also moved sharply lower today, losing 1.3% of its value. The stock is now the fifth-most shorted stock on the Dow, showing that investors are turning more bearish on the company.

    On the flip side, UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH  ) is up 1.8% on hope that Medicare payments may rise. Bloomberg is reporting that congressional researchers have the authority to raise payments to insurers if officials assume that a 25% cut in physicians' pay won't go into effect. This could lead payment rates to rise by 4% to 5%, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. Higher rates means bigger profits -- something all investors want.

    When President Obama was re-elected, shares of UnitedHealth and other health insurers fell immediately. Is Obamacare a death knell for health insurers, or is the market missing out on some of the opportunities the law presents? In this brand-new premium report on UnitedHealth, The Motley Fool takes a long-term view, honing in on�prospects for UnitedHealth in a post-Obamacare world. So don't miss out -- simply�click here now�to claim your copy today.

    Is Tornier Working Hard Enough for You?

    Margins matter. The more Tornier (Nasdaq: TRNX  ) keeps of each buck it earns in revenue, the more money it has to invest in growth, fund new strategic plans, or (gasp!) distribute to shareholders. Healthy margins often separate pretenders from the best stocks in the market. That's why we check up on margins at least once a quarter in this series. I'm looking for the absolute numbers, so I can compare them to current and potential competitors, and any trend that may tell me how strong Tornier's competitive position could be.

    Here's the current margin snapshot for Tornier over the trailing 12 months: Gross margin is 72.3%, while operating margin is -1.5% and net margin is -7.8%.

    Unfortunately, a look at the most recent numbers doesn't tell us much about where Tornier has been, or where it's going. A company with rising gross and operating margins often fuels its growth by increasing demand for its products. If it sells more units while keeping costs in check, its profitability increases. Conversely, a company with gross margins that inch downward over time is often losing out to competition, and possibly engaging in a race to the bottom on prices. If it can't make up for this problem by cutting costs -- and most companies can't -- then both the business and its shares face a decidedly bleak outlook.

    Of course, over the short term, the kind of economic shocks we recently experienced can drastically affect a company's profitability. That's why I like to look at five fiscal years' worth of margins, along with the results for the trailing 12 months, the last fiscal year, and last fiscal quarter (LFQ). You can't always reach a hard conclusion about your company's health, but you can better understand what to expect, and what to watch.

    Here's the margin picture for Tornier over the past few years.

    Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

    Because of seasonality in some businesses, the numbers for the last period on the right -- the TTM figures -- aren't always comparable to the FY results preceding them. To compare quarterly margins to their prior-year levels, consult this chart.

    Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

    Here's how the stats break down:

    • Over the past five years, gross margin peaked at 74.3% and averaged 72.6%. Operating margin peaked at -1.5% and averaged -7.2%. Net margin peaked at -7.8% and averaged -17.1%.
    • TTM gross margin is 72.3%, 30 basis points worse than the five-year average. TTM operating margin is -1.5%, 570 basis points better than the five-year average. TTM net margin is -7.8%, 930 basis points better than the five-year average.

    With recent TTM operating margins exceeding historical averages, but net margins still negative, Tornier still has some work to do.

    Is Tornier the best health care stock for you? Learn how to maximize your investment income and "Secure Your Future With 9 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks," including one above-average health care logistics company. Click here for instant access to this free report.

    • Add Tornier to My Watchlist.

    Friday, March 29, 2013

    Intel: Cut Spending, Says Goldman; Intel Knows What to Do, Says Oakmark

    Shares of Intel (INTC) are up 9 cents, or 0.6%, at $21.86, as Goldman Sachs’s James Covello offers a suggestion: cut capital expenditures.

    Covello, who has a Sell rating on Intel shares, and a $16 price target, thinks a 3% climb in the shares through yesterday was all about investors expecting Intel would cut some of the $13.5 billion in spending it has planned for this year. After spending 100% of operating cash flow in seven of the last eight quarters, on capital spending, on dividends, and on share repurchases, net cash fell from $20 billion to $5 billion from Q4 of 2010 through Q4 of last year.

    Covello thinks PC inventories are too high, and that Intel has been unnecessarily contributing to that inventory build-up:

    If Intel were to significantly reduce capex to about $7-$8 bn, then we would likely be less negative on the stock. As we have written previously, the primary reason for our Sell rating is our view that Intel�s robust capex has created excess supply. For example, Intel�s 4Q12 fab utilization was about 50%, and PC OEM inventory is near a multi-year high (Exhibit 2). We do not believe a small capex reduction would be sufficient to fix the supply problem, as Intel already added significant capacity with its capex increase to $11 bn in 2011 and 2012 from about $5 bn on average in 2007-2010. In addition, our hardware team expects 2013 PC units to decline slightly yoy.

    The equipment makers wouldn’t be hurt too much, Covello thinks, by a cut in spend by Intel, given “Intel’s orders to the SPE companies are currently very low and this is unlikely to change that.”

    “In fact, we believe one reason investors expect a capex cut is due to comments from the supply chain on low logic orders.”

    Covello models Intel making $53.4 billion in revenue this year and $1.65 in GAAP EPS. That is below consensus of $53.8 billion and $1.93.

    Update: Bill Nygren of The Oakmark Funds was on CNBC‘s “Half Time” a short while ago. When asked by CNBC’s Pete Najarian about whether he agreed with Goldman on the capex point, Nygren made clear he did not: “One of the reasons we own Intel is that we trust them to come up with the right number for capital expenditures to best maximum value for shareholders.”

    Added Nygren, “You’ve got a dividend yield on intel that’s not much below Italian bonds, and I think Intel is safer.”

    Aqua America Divests Florida Businesses

    Bryn Mawr, Pa.-based Aqua America (NYSE: WTR  ) has just completed a sizable divestiture of nearly two-thirds of its businesses in Florida, raising nearly $53 million in cash as a result.

    The company announced Thursday that, in three separate transactions, it has sold:

    • One water system and one wastewater system serving the Arredondo Farms community in Alachua County to privately held YES Communities Companies, LLC, for $1.1 million
    • Nine water systems and four wastewater systems across five counties to privately held U.S. Water for $1.6 million
    • In the main event, 57 water systems and 23 wastewater systems across 12 Florida counties to the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) for $50.2 million

    In all, the divestitures covered 17 Florida counties, and 65% of Aqua America's Florida customer base, and raised $52.9 million for the company -- and it's not done yet.

    Aqua says it expects to sell its remaining Florida operations in Sarasota and DeSoto counties in the second or third quarter of 2013. Once those sales have been finalized, the company will have pulled out of Florida entirely, and will concentrate its efforts in the eight states of Ohio, North Carolina, Illinois, Texas, New Jersey, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. In the latter two, the company says that�it's actually expanding.

    Aqua America shares closed the abbreviated holiday trading week Thursday up 1.5%, at $31.44.

    Netflix: My Single Worst Investment of all Time

    Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX  ) has taken investors for a ride over the last year and a half, but those individuals who maintained their resolve, and held onto Netflix through the ups and downs, did incredibly well.�

    However, continuing to hold shares of Netflix as it soared to new highs, and crashed down to earth, was easier said then done. In the video below, Jeremy explains why investors should never sell a stock purely because of share price movement, and reveals one simple truth that could save your portfolio.

    If you're looking for the next stock that could have Netflix-like returns, The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for this year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report, "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access the report, and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

    More Expert Advice from The Motley Fool The precipitous drop in Netflix shares since the summer of 2011 has caused many shareholders to lose hope. While the company's first-mover status is often viewed as a competitive advantage, the opportunities in streaming media have brought some new, deep-pocketed rivals looking for their piece of a growing pie. Can Netflix fend off this burgeoning competition, and will its international growth aspirations really pay off? These are must-know issues for investors, which is why we've released a brand-new premium report on Netflix. Inside, you'll learn about the key opportunities and risks facing the company, as well as reasons to buy or sell the stock. We're also offering a full year of updates as key news hits, so make sure to click here and claim a copy today.

    Which Ultra-Low-Cost Carrier Is Right for Your Portfolio?

    The past few years have seen a new innovation in American aviation: the "ultra-low-cost carrier", or ULCC. Spirit Airlines (NASDAQ: SAVE  ) has led this movement since 2007, when it began charging for checked bags and snacks, two items that had traditionally been complementary in the industry. However, Allegiant Travel (NASDAQ: ALGT  ) had already begun implementing some aspects of the ULCC model, and has continued down that road in recent years. More recently, Republic Airways (NASDAQ: RJET  ) has focused on converting its Frontier Airlines subsidiary to a ULCC model over the past year or so.

    However, the ULCC model is not well-defined; Spirit, Allegiant, and Frontier actually have very different business models. While all three businesses are promising investment candidates, I think that Frontier parent Republic Airways could be the best of the group. Frontier has a much more customer-friendly fee policy than either Spirit or Allegiant, which makes it more likely to gain a loyal customer base. Moreover, the company trades at a significant discount to Spirit and Allegiant, even though management has made significant progress on the company's turnaround.

    Low fares and high fees
    Spirit's strategy is very simple; it finds the lowest-cost way to transport passengers from point A to point B, and then keeps base fares low while charging fees for a variety of optional services. "Non-ticket" revenue from fees for checked and carry-on bags, selling on-board food and drinks, charging for membership in a frequent traveler discount club, and similar sources accounts for approximately 40% of Spirit's revenue. Spirit keeps costs down by offering a single class of service, using a single fleet type (the Airbus A320 family), and fitting more seats onto each plane than other airlines. The company expects to continue reducing its cost structure (already the lowest in the industry) as it grows.

    Spirit targets large existing air travel markets (more than 200 passengers per day each way) with high average fares. As a result, the company competes with legacy carriers on many of its newer routes. However, whereas the legacy carriers offer frequent service to cater to business travelers, Spirit only flies once or twice a day on most routes.

    With its low fares, Spirit can attract many leisure travelers who are flexible about scheduling and are willing to sacrifice a little comfort to save money. Low fares also stimulate additional demand from people who could not afford to fly when fares were higher. Spirit serves roughly 125 markets today, but management estimates that there are more than 400 additional markets that meet its criteria for eventual service. This provides a nice runway for future growth.

    Small cities go on vacation
    Allegiant has many similarities to Spirit. Allegiant also offers a single class of service, charges low base fares, and derives a large and increasing percentage of its revenue from "ancillary" products and services. Furthermore, the company just finished adding 16 seats to each of its MD-80 aircraft to reduce unit costs. However, Allegiant's business model is fundamentally different from Spirit's. Whereas Spirit aims to break into large travel markets (typically served by big legacy carriers), Allegiant serves leisure travelers in smaller cities that do not have any other commercial airline service.

    Allegiant's secret to success is buying older, out-of-favor airplanes cheaply. Whereas Spirit needs to utilize its aircraft heavily to spread its fixed costs over many flights, Allegiant can afford to concentrate its flying on days and at times when it is most profitable to do so, while leaving its jets parked during off-peak hours. Allegiant capitalizes on this flexibility by concentrating its flying on leisure routes from small cities to warm-weather destinations. These routes usually do not have enough traffic to support daily flights, but it is easy for Allegiant to serve those markets less frequently; Allegiant flies most of its routes just twice a week. This strategy allows Allegiant to profitably serve markets that are too small for other carriers. Accordingly, the company faces competition on only 10% of its routes, which is good for profit margins.

    Allegiant also has ample expansion opportunities ahead of it. The company began serving Hawaii last year, after acquiring Boeing 757 aircraft that were capable of long-distance flying. Allegiant will begin receiving Airbus A319/A320 aircraft this year, which opens up even more new route opportunities, as these planes have a longer range than the MD-80 and can serve airports with short runways, unlike the MD-80. This will allow Allegiant to add flights to other underserved markets.

    A new Frontier
    Frontier is just now making the transition to a ULCC model. Its business model has some aspects in common with Spirit and Allegiant. Like both other ULCCs, Frontier is adding seats to many of its planes to increase capacity; however, Frontier offers more legroom in the front row and exit rows of its planes. It calls these seats "STRETCH" seating, charges extra for those rows, and allows STRETCH customers to board the flight early. In other areas, Frontier has not pushed as hard on fees: unlike Spirit and Allegiant, Frontier does not charge for carry-on bags.

    Frontier is also similar to Allegiant in that it is attacking smaller markets. The company has recently begun flying from Trenton, N.J., to a variety of destinations, and last year Frontier began flying to a variety of smaller cities from Orlando. However, unlike Allegiant and Spirit, Frontier operates most of its flights in a hub-and-spoke arrangement at Denver International Airport. This puts it in sharp competition with the airport's two largest carriers, United Continental (NYSE: UAL  ) and Southwest Airlines (NYSE: LUV  ) . This obviously creates some competitive challenges, but it also allows Frontier to offer many more connecting itineraries than Spirit or Allegiant. Denver is very well-situated for east-west connections within the U.S. Moreover, Frontier executives have stated that the company was profitable in Denver last year, and the company's continued cost cutting and route optimization plans should improve profitability.

    From an investing standpoint, the biggest advantage of Frontier is that it is much cheaper than Allegiant and Spirit, which trade at 13.8 and 10.5 times forward earnings, respectively. Frontier parent Republic Airways trades at just 6.4 times forward earnings, allowing investors to get in on the ground floor of a new ULCC story. Frontier's changing route network indicates flexibility and a results-oriented culture at the management level. The company is currently in "experimentation mode", but when the cost structure and route network is optimized, I expect significant margin expansion.

    Conclusion
    I believe all three ULCCs are viable investment candidates today. Their low-cost structures and relatively nimble organizations should allow them to continue gaining share with respect to major carriers. However, I think the biggest opportunity today is in Frontier parent Republic Airways. It has not yet gotten credit for Frontier's transition to a ULCC model, and therefore trades at a very low earnings multiple. Success is obviously not guaranteed, but the company definitely seems to be on the right track for substantial earnings growth.

    The price of becoming the world's greatest investor is that Warren Buffett can no longer make many of the types of investments that made him rich in the first place. Find out about one such opportunity in "The Stock Buffett Wishes He Could Buy." The free report details a sector of the economy Buffett's heavily invested in right now and exactly why he can't buy one attractive company in that sector. Click here to keep reading.�

    Pentagon Awards German Firm a $343.6 Million Missile Contract

    In a concrete demonstration of bilateral military cooperation, the U.S. Department of Defense announced Thursday that it has awarded a firm-fixed-price contract worth $343.6 million to German defense firm RAMSYS GmbH. The contract calls for RAMSYS to supply "445 Block 2 MK-44 Mod 4 Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) Guided Missile Round Pack (GMRP) All-Up-Rounds (AURs)."

    That's quite a mouthful, and probably requires some explaining. RAMSYS, aka RAM System GmbH, is a Raytheon (NYSE: RTN  ) partner and a joint venture among three European defense firms: privately held Diehl Stiftung owns 25% of RAMSYS, its subsidiary Diehl BGT Defence owns a further 25%, and MBDA Holdings -- itself owned by BAE Systems (NASDAQOTH: BAESY  ) , EADS (NASDAQOTH: EADSY  ) , and Finmeccanica (NASDAQOTH: FINMY  ) -- owns the remaining 50% of RAMSYS.

    RAMSYS's near-sole raison d'etre is to build Rolling Airframe Missiles -- the "RAM" in RAMSYS -- for Europe's militaries.

    As for the RAM itself, this is an anti-aircraft and anti-cruise missile defense system used on multiple ship platforms in Europe, and was co-developed, and is co-produced, by the U.S. and German governments. The RAM got its name�because the surface-to-air missiles that it fires tend to spin or "roll" while in flight. The system is currently in service on about 78 U.S. Navy warships, and aboard 30 German vessels, and the Navies of South Korea, Egypt, Greece, Japan, Turkey, and the UAE are all considering, or have already begun adopting, the RAM, as well.

    The Pentagon contract awarded Thursday is expected to be completed by January 2019, and will be 100% paid for by the German government.

    ��

    3 Stocks to Get on Your Watchlist

    I follow quite a lot of companies, so the usefulness of a watchlist to me cannot be overstated. Without my watchlist, I'd be unable to keep up on my favorite sectors and see what's really moving the market. Even worse, I'd be lost when the time came to choose which stock I'm buying or shorting next.

    Today is Watchlist Wednesday, so I'm discussing three companies that have crossed my radar in the past week -- and at what point I may consider taking action on these calls with my own money. Keep in mind that these aren't concrete buy or sell recommendations, nor do I guarantee I'll take action on the companies being discussed. What I can promise is that you can�follow my real-life transactions�through my profile and that I, like everyone else here at The Motley Fool, will continue to hold the integrity of our�disclosure policy�in the highest regard.

    Cliffs Natural Resources (NYSE: CLF  )
    Let me preface this by saying that we aren't at the point where I�m ready to pull the trigger on Cliffs Natural Resources yet� but we�re getting pretty close. As a value seeker and contrarian investor I have a penchant for seeking out companies that have been discarded by investors with little thought to future share appreciation. Cliffs Natural Resources perfectly fits that bill.

    In February, Cliffs was forced to drastically reduce its quarterly dividend by 76% from $0.625 to just $0.15 as iron ore demand fell and coal costs soured from the previous year. A weakening U.S. market as well as lower demand from China kept output down as costs crept higher.

    But things aren't nearly as bad as they might appear for Cliffs. An unwanted 10.4 million share offering will dilute outstanding shareholders by 7%�but boost its net debt levels from $4.15 billion to perhaps just $2.2 billion or less. The outlook for both iron ore and metallurgical coal in China and the U.S. is also improving. China has pledged to beef up its heavy infrastructure spending, which should result in a stabilization of iron ore prices. In addition, homebuilding activity is likely to increase domestically with inventories falling and builders seeing home prices edging higher. Cliffs is set up to surprise investors with a big comeback in 2014 and its nearly 3% yield is nothing to sneeze at, either!

    Michael Kors (NYSE: KORS  )
    Wall Street is completely fascinated with brand-name apparel and accessories designer Michael Kors, which has found an affinity for growing healthfully in double digits in both the U.S. and Europe despite consumer weakness in both regions. In addition, Michael Kors has managed to fund its rapid expansion entirely through operating cash flow, leaving it with a debt-free balance sheet and a bit more than $400 million in cash. Yet I feel as if I remain the lone bear on Wall Street.

    I have witnessed rapid growth stories come and go in the retail sector before, and while Michael Kors may have staying power now, the sheer rule of large numbers will make its growth trajectory and valuation impossible to maintain. Growing austerity measures in Europe and higher payroll taxes in the U.S. are bound to eat into consumers' appetites for brand-name apparel and should serve to slow down sales.

    Another precursor that could predict an eventual sales decline is a 25-million-share sale by insiders announced last month. While it doesn't dilute existing shareholders, it drastically reduces the holdings by insiders, which gives off the impression to shareholders that a top may be near.�

    As a final warning, we have the slowing growth rates of Fossil,�which makes Kors' watches and allows Kors to rebrand them under its own name, and handbag maker Coach, which has languished under higher promotional usage and weaker spending budgets in the U.S. Both Fossil and Coach exhibited phenomenal growth within the past decade, but have since seen it taper off due to poor macro trends in Europe for Fossil, and weak U.S. spending trends for Coach. That doesn't mean Kors can't become an excellent long-term investment, but based on sheer valuation and a trailing P/E of 32, this simply isn't sustainable.

    Jamba (NASDAQ: JMBA  )
    Last year I made a big stink about rewarding results that were simply less bad than before. Here we are in 2013, and Jamba is the latest recipient of the "It wasn't as bad as last year, so let's rally, rally, rally" award. But contrary to popular belief, things aren't anywhere near peachy or running smoothly (or should I say smoothie) in Jamba-land, and caution should be exercised.

    Jamba reported a lower-than-expected fourth-quarter loss of $0.09 earlier this month as it drastically cut costs and attempted to introduce new menu items in order to drive store traffic. While smaller losses are always welcome, it hardly makes up for the fact that Jamba has reported seven consecutive annual losses.

    Jamba's worries also extend into its expansion plans, which call for adding up to 125 franchise-owned stores entirely in the state of California. I often don't question expansion plans if they're justified, but adding 125 locations in a single state -- which is struggling, might I add -- where many of its locations already exist, all while revenue is flat, is not a very wise move.

    Do yourself a favor: The next time you want to invest in the drink sector, just go with the top dog, Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX  ) . Starbucks' expanded menu offerings, a complete array of sugary no-nos and organic healthy drinks and snacks, as well as nationwide branding and location dominance make it the go-to name in the sector. If Jamba rises much further, I'd suggest keeping an eye on the action of short-sellers.

    Foolish roundup
    Is my bullishness or bearishness misplaced? Share your thoughts in the comments section below, and consider following my cue by using these links to add these companies to your free, personalized Watchlist to keep up on the latest news with each company:

    • Add Cliffs Natural Resources to My Watchlist.
    • Add Michael Kors to My Watchlist.
    • Add Jamba to My Watchlist.

    Is Cliffs a deep-value play or a value trap?
    Cliffs Natural Resources has grown from a domestic iron ore producer into an international player in both the iron ore and metallurgical coal markets. It has also underwhelmed investors lately, especially after its dramatic 76% dividend cut in February. However, it could now be looked at as a possible value play due to several factors that are likely to remain advantageous for Cliffs' management. For details on these advantages and more, click here now to check out The Motley Fool's premium research report on the company.

    Top Stocks For 3/28/2013-6

    Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (OTCBB:CRWE) announced recently that it has launched its crwenewswire.fr website to provide news in France’s native language. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. had previously launched its German website crwenewswire.de and is launching its Canadian website crwenewswire.ca shortly.

    “The new website is one step in many towards the company goal of expanding its footprint internationally, ” commented Kenneth Bosket, President and CEO of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. “Our goal for 2010 is to have all CRWE’s clients’ press releases, articles and news content published in every major financial country’s native language, as well as within cities of every state of our country,” stated Mr. Bosket.

    In other news, Crown Equity Holdings Inc. announced that its sales this year have already surpassed $1,000,000. This compares to $232,510 for the three quarters ending September 30, 2009 and $ 659,907 total sales for the year 2009.

    Crown Equity Holdings Inc. is a consulting organization which provides and assists small business owners with the knowledge required in taking their company public, and has re-focused its primary vision with its aligned group of independent website divisions to providing media advertising services, as a worldwide online media advertising publisher, dedicated to the distribution of quality branding information, as well as search engine optimization for its clients.

    Lender Processing Services, Inc. (NYSE: LPS), a leading provider of integrated technology and services to the mortgage and real estate industries, is scheduled to report third quarter 2010 financial results after the close of regular market trading on Thursday, October 28, 2010.

    Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS) is a leading provider of integrated technology andservices to the mortgage and real estate industries. LPS offers solutions that span the mortgage continuum, including lead generation, origination, workflow automation (Desktop), servicing, portfolio retention and default, augmented by the company’s award-winning customer support and professional services. Approximately 50 percent of all U.S. mortgages by dollar volume are serviced using LPS’s Mortgage Servicing Package (MSP). LPS also offers proprietary mortgage and real estate data and analytics for the mortgage and capital markets industries.

    Lennox International Inc. (NYSE: LII) declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock, payable on October 15, 2010 to stockholders of record as of October 1, 2010.

    Through its subsidiaries, Lennox International Inc. is a global leader in the heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration markets.

    Lennar Corporation (NYSE: LEN) has completed the acquisitions of approximately $740 million of distressed real estate assets, in separate transactions, from three large financial institutions. The acquired assets include loans with a total unpaid principal balance of approximately $529 million and real estate properties (“REO”) with an appraised value of approximately $211 million. The real estate assets in these transactions were purchased at a discount and paid for with a combination of cash and senior unsecured financing provided by one of the selling financial institutions.

    The combined portfolio includes approximately 397 loans and 306 properties. The assets consist primarily of non-performing residential and commercial acquisition, development and construction loans and REO relating to land, lots, and single-family and multi-family residential communities at varying stages of completion. The acquired assets are located in 17 states, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions of the United States. In the combined portfolio, 65% of the assets are residential and 35% are commercial. Lennar’s Rialto Investments segment will be responsible for the oversight and day-to-day management and workout of the combined portfolio.

    Lennar Corporation, founded in 1954, is one of the nation’s leading builders of quality homes for all generations. The Company builds affordable, move-up and retirement homes primarily under the Lennar brand name. Lennar’s Financial Services segment provides primarily mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services for both buyers of the Company’s homes and others. Lennar’s Rialto Investments segment is focused on distressed real estate asset investments, asset management and workout strategies.

    Is Tornier Working Hard Enough for You?

    Margins matter. The more Tornier (Nasdaq: TRNX  ) keeps of each buck it earns in revenue, the more money it has to invest in growth, fund new strategic plans, or (gasp!) distribute to shareholders. Healthy margins often separate pretenders from the best stocks in the market. That's why we check up on margins at least once a quarter in this series. I'm looking for the absolute numbers, so I can compare them to current and potential competitors, and any trend that may tell me how strong Tornier's competitive position could be.

    Here's the current margin snapshot for Tornier over the trailing 12 months: Gross margin is 72.3%, while operating margin is -1.5% and net margin is -7.8%.

    Unfortunately, a look at the most recent numbers doesn't tell us much about where Tornier has been, or where it's going. A company with rising gross and operating margins often fuels its growth by increasing demand for its products. If it sells more units while keeping costs in check, its profitability increases. Conversely, a company with gross margins that inch downward over time is often losing out to competition, and possibly engaging in a race to the bottom on prices. If it can't make up for this problem by cutting costs -- and most companies can't -- then both the business and its shares face a decidedly bleak outlook.

    Of course, over the short term, the kind of economic shocks we recently experienced can drastically affect a company's profitability. That's why I like to look at five fiscal years' worth of margins, along with the results for the trailing 12 months, the last fiscal year, and last fiscal quarter (LFQ). You can't always reach a hard conclusion about your company's health, but you can better understand what to expect, and what to watch.

    Here's the margin picture for Tornier over the past few years.

    Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

    Because of seasonality in some businesses, the numbers for the last period on the right -- the TTM figures -- aren't always comparable to the FY results preceding them. To compare quarterly margins to their prior-year levels, consult this chart.

    Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

    Here's how the stats break down:

    • Over the past five years, gross margin peaked at 74.3% and averaged 72.6%. Operating margin peaked at -1.5% and averaged -7.2%. Net margin peaked at -7.8% and averaged -17.1%.
    • TTM gross margin is 72.3%, 30 basis points worse than the five-year average. TTM operating margin is -1.5%, 570 basis points better than the five-year average. TTM net margin is -7.8%, 930 basis points better than the five-year average.

    With recent TTM operating margins exceeding historical averages, but net margins still negative, Tornier still has some work to do.

    Is Tornier the best health care stock for you? Learn how to maximize your investment income and "Secure Your Future With 9 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks," including one above-average health care logistics company. Click here for instant access to this free report.

    • Add Tornier to My Watchlist.

    Why Apple, eBay, and Walmart have some of the biggest data warehouses you’ve ever seen - 08:53 PM

    (gigaom.com) -- In an age of Hadoop and a general analytics revolution, it’s easy to poke fun at legacy data warehouse vendors such as Teradata. Some people might even call it fun. After all, they sell expensive appliances and weren’t built from the ground up to handle the unstructured data that most people think of when they think of “big data.”

    But whatever you think about Teradata’s approach to handling big data workloads, make no mistake about the company’s clout: It has been around for decades, and it’s still analyzing boatloads of data for some of the biggest names in business. I spent a day in February touring the Teradata Labs facility in San Diego, and although I heard all about the technology and the company’s vision for a Teradata-Hadoop-Aster analytics super-environment, the thing that stuck out most were the users. Walmart, eBay, Continental … Apple.

    More from gigaom.com
    • If there's no such thing as anonymous data, does privacy just mean security?
    • SEC ruling gives boost to online funding tool for startups
    • Do digital tools help with diabetes? New report casts doubt
    • Subscribe to gigaom.com

    Here’s how they’re all using Teradata and at what scale (try not to faint when you think of the bill):

    • Apple: Apple is operating a multiple-petabyte Teradata system (that became apparent during its iCloud launch in 2011) and, I learned, was Teradata’s “fastest ever customer to a petabyte.” Apple uses the data warehouse to get a better understanding of its customers across product groups. Now every piece of identifiable information — and those iTunes interactiona generate a lot of data — goes into the system so the company knows who’s who and what they’re up to.
    • Walmart: The retail giant deployed Teradata’s first-ever terabyte-scale database in 1992, and it has grown, uh, a bit since then. Its operational system was at 2.5 petabytes as of 2008, and is certainly leaps and bounds bigger by now — likely well into the double digits when you consider it operates separate ones for Walmart and Sam’s Club as well as a backup system. The analytics efforts have essentially helped Walmart become a massive consignment shop. It tells suppliers, “You have three feet of shelf space. Optimize it.” And then it gives them any data they could possibly need to determine what’s selling, how fast and even whether they should redesign their packaging to fit more on the shelves.
    • eBay: eBay (e ebay) has two systems in place, and they’re both big. Its primary data warehouse is 9.2 petabyes; its “singularity system” that stores web clicks and other “big” data is more than 40 petabytes. It has a single table that’s 1 trillion rows. Yes, this is smaller than the 50 petabytes worth of Hadoop capacity eBay added last year, but Teradata is quick to point out that all of its systems support data into and out of Hadoop, so it’s not as if eBay is operating two entirely distinct data environments.

    Of course, Teradata has lots of other petabyte-scale customers, with Verizon, AT&T and Bank of America among them. Here are a few more interesting use cases:

    • Harrah’s (now part of the Caesar’s Entertainment casino empire) understands how much money particular gamblers can afford to lose in a day before they won’t come back the next day.
    • Disney is rolling out new bracelet tickets equipped with GPS and NFC that track everything visitors do while inside Disney’s amusement parks. The New York Times detailed the privacy implications of this move in a January article.
    • A manufacturing customer generates 20 terabytes of data per hour while testing products, although that volume is ultimately reduced to about 1 terabyte after the valuable data is filtered out.
    • At some point, Continental Airlines decided it wanted to keep its customers happy and began assessing them by lifetime value (which, it turns out, is often inversely related to frequent-flyer status) and began making alternative arrangements for them as soon as the airline realized flights would be delayed.
    • A luxury car company used Aster Data to analyze the pattern of failures for various components inside its cars. It found out that lighting, seats and infotainment often failed together (they’re on the same circuit) and began inspecting all three when a customer comes in for service on any of them.

    None of this means Teradata is destined to continue being a huge name in analytics (Scott Yara, co-founder of rival EMC Greenplum, recently called data warehouses this generation’s mainframe), but it’s still interesting to learn how big companies are analyzing their data, regardless what they’re running on. And with exabytes worth of data no doubt residing in customer systems across the world, Teradata isn’t going anywhere soon.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

    • The importance of putting the U and I in visualization
    • 2012: The Hadoop infrastructure market booms
    • A near-term outlook for big data