Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Prime Music's Apparent Weaknesses Are Actually Its Biggest Strengths

Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN  ) is giving away over 1 million MP3s to every Prime subscriber.

The company unveiled its Prime Music service on Thursday. The on-demand streaming service is severely limited in its early stages, offering just 5% of the catalog of other streaming services like Spotify or Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) Beats Music. Additionally, Prime Music doesn't offer an Internet radio feature like Pandora Media (NYSE: P  ) .

At first blush, these obvious weaknesses may make it seem like Prime Music is doomed to fail. But what seem like Prime Music's biggest weaknesses may turn out to be its biggest strengths.

When 1 million is a small number
Amazon boasts over 1 million songs available for free streaming on Prime Music. While 1 million songs sounds like a lot (I certainly have listened to far fewer in my life), it pales in comparison to the competition.

Beats Music, Spotify, Rdio, and Rhapsody each sport around 20 million songs available for streaming. Pandora offers a similarly large set of songs from all the major recording labels.

Amazon's first stumbling block came with Universal Music Group. Although the company says it's in active discussions with Universal, the omission from the catalog at launch is painstakingly noticeable.

Additionally, the service omits songs released within the last six months. This might not be as big of a problem for a streaming service as omitting an entire label's catalog from the library, but it's something all of the competitors have.

Why a limited library may be an asset for Amazon
Amazon operates the second largest digital music store after Apple's iTunes.

The nascent digital download industry is already being disrupted by streaming services. Last year, digital download sales fell for the first time in history. In the first quarter of 2014, digital music sales declined 13.3%, according to Nielsen SoundScan.

Meanwhile, streaming services continue to grow. Pandora, for example, grew listener hours 28% and 30% in April and May, respectively. (Note: That comes after lifting monthly listener hour restrictions.) Overall, on-demand streaming plays climbed 34.7% in the first quarter of 2014.

Apple has responded to the rise of music streaming by joining it. Last year, the company launched iTunes Radio, and the company acquired Beats Electronics and its music streaming service last month. Apple hopes these efforts will mitigate the effect of declining digital sales.

Amazon's billion-dollar digital music store is similarly under attack, and Prime Music is its answer to the plethora of music streaming options.

Prime Music is integrated with the rest of Amazon's music store, now simply dubbed Amazon Music. To play songs, Prime members are asked to add interesting albums and playlists to their personal library, where the free Prime Music is collected along with personal uploads to Amazon Cloud Player and past purchases from Amazon MP3. It puts all of the user's available music in one place.

More important, this seamless integration with the digital music store may ultimately lead to users exploring outside of the Prime Music catalog in order to bolster their libraries. Amazon uses its recommendation engine to funnel users toward actual purchases as well as other free Prime Music offers.

Can the loss-leader strategy work?
If someone is looking for a stand-alone on-demand streaming service, Prime Music is probably at the bottom of the list... unless they've already subscribed to Amazon Prime. At that point, it requires serious consideration, and at least a test run.

That may be one of the keys to Amazon's strategy: Get people in the door with 1 million free songs, then make money on the back end selling them new (or otherwise unavailable) music in the digital download store.

Big-box retailers have used the loss-leader strategy successfully for years. Amazon's entire Prime service is practically based on it. Prime Music is just another extension of the strategy, and a smart one at that.

Leaked: Apple's next secret weapon
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

St. Louis trial highlights gender bias in pay

ST. LOUIS (AP) — From male-only corporate jets to guys' golf outings and hunting trips, Francine Katz says her time in the Anheuser-Busch executive suite was rife with exclusion and outright discrimination. But it wasn't until the King of Beers' 2008 sale to Belgian brewer InBev that she says she realized the boy's club atmosphere was costing her millions.

In a 20-year career that saw her rise from a young corporate lawyer to a vice president, key strategist and the beer maker's top female executive, Katz became the face of her hometown employer, defending the maker of Budweiser and Bud Light from overzealous regulators and anti-alcohol crusaders.

Now she's accusing Anheuser-Busch of sex discrimination, arguing in a lawsuit that reached trial this week that top male executives — including former CEOs August Busch III and his son, August Busch IV — purposely paid her less because she's a woman. Six years after the sale of AB to InBev, the trial fascinates a company town, threatening to heap unwanted publicity to a family dynasty that's had its share.

"This was a company run by men who were unaccustomed with working with women at high levels," Katz's attorney, Mary Anne Sedey, told the jury of seven women and five men in opening arguments of a trial expected to last several weeks.

In March, the White House Council on Economic Advisers issued a report noting that on average full-time working women earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by their male counterparts. Critics of the report said that figure oversimplifies the situation, but even they concede that women with advanced degrees in fields such as medicine and law face a persistent wage gap as their careers advance.

Counting bonuses and stock options, Katz earned more than $1 million annually after her 2002 promotion to vice president of communications and consumer affairs and elevation to the company's influential strategy committee. Her predecessor, former National Urban League President John Jacob, earned four time! s that amount in his final year, Katz's lawyer said. Katz said she didn't realize the pay gap until reviewing tax filings connected to the sale to InBev.

Katz said August Busch III called her "ungrateful" after she raised complaints about the disparity.

"Make no mistake about it. Francine Katz earned a lot of money at Anheuser-Busch," Sedey said. "But like so many women in this country, Francine Katz was significantly underpaid."

Her attorney said Katz deserves at least $9.4 million she was entitled to from 2002 to 2008, plus punitive damages. In 2008, her final year with the company, Katz reported more than $14 million in income on her federal tax returns, an amount that includes stock options she cashed in.

Lawyers for Anheuser-Busch counter that Katz's salary, benefits and bonuses compared favorably to those in similar positions at Coca-Cola, Proctor & Gamble and other large U.S. corporations. They suggested that her primary duty involved public relations, while Jacob had far more substantive responsibilities, including as August Busch III's trusted confidant.

"Francine Katz was paid based on her job, not her gender," said Anheuser-Busch attorney Jim Bennett. "There was a fair process used, a rigorous process used."

On Friday afternoon, August Busch III took the stand, verbally sparring with a member of Katz's legal team as he recounted the company's methods for paying top executives. His son and namesake, who led the company for two years before its sale, is also expected to testify. Their presence is sure to draw attention in St. Louis, where numerous buildings — including the St. Louis Cardinals' stadium — bear the family name.

The elder Busch, 76, succeeded his father as CEO in 1975 at 38 in a coup initially resisted by August "Gussie" Busch Jr. August Busch III remained in charge for nearly three decades before his 2002 retirement and stayed on as chairman of its board of directors through 2006. Under his watch, the family business founded by Ge! rman immi! grants in 1876 became the country's largest brewer.

Colleagues and underlings said Busch ruled with a hair-trigger temper. Katz testified that Jacob told her Busch avoided discussing a contentious environmental issue with her because he was afraid Katz would cry.

August Busch IV, 49, was better known for his legal missteps and love of nightlife before his ascendancy to the boardroom. As a sophomore at the University of Arizona, Busch caused a 1983 car accident that led to the death of his 22-year-old passenger, waitress Michele Frederick. A seven-month police investigation of a possible involuntary manslaughter concluded without charges being filed.

In 2010, the younger Busch re-entered the spotlight when his 27-year-old girlfriend died of an accidental drug overdose at his mansion. He later settled a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Adrienne Martin's family for $1.75 million.

Katz testified that Busch and another company executive forced her to fly on a separate corporate plane when the group traveled to Ohio for meetings with government officials. On other occasions, she was excluded from corporate golf tournaments and other functions, she said.

"I felt invisible," Katz said.

Follow Alan Scher Zagier on Twitter at @azagier.

Monday, December 29, 2014

Haven't Filed Your Taxes? Avoid These 3 Costly Mistakes

APDW8C Business meeting Alamy In the rush to get your tax returns out the door, it's common to make costly mistakes. Let's look at three of the most common last-minute issues. Getting An Extension? Don't Forget This Vital Step If you can't get your taxes finished by the April 15 deadline, the Internal Revenue Service will freely grant you a six-month extension to file your taxes, giving you until Oct. 15 to get all your numbers and records together and put together a final return for filing. But just because you can get a free extension to file doesn't mean that you get extra time to pay. Even if you request and receive a six-month tax filing extension, you're still liable for any tax you still owe. If you don't pay, then the clock will begin on interest and penalties for failing to pay. At current rates, those charges will include 3 percent interest on the underpaid amount, plus an extra 1/2 of 1 percent in penalties for every month your unpaid tax is late. The penalty maxes out at 25 percent if you're 50 months or more late on your payments. Still, extending is a smart move even if you can't pay, because if you don't request an extension and file 60 days late or more, then the minimum penalty becomes $135 or 100 percent of your unpaid tax, whichever is less -- regardless of what percentage of your total tax liability that ends up being. In general, it makes sense to slightly overpay your expected taxes with your extension request so as to give yourself some breathing room in case your initial calculations prove to be incorrect. Take All the Credits You're Entitled to Receive Remembering to claim all the tax breaks that you deserve often gets lost in the shuffle. The IRS estimates one out of every five federal tax filers don't claim the money they're entitled to with the Earned Income Tax Credit. The worst thing about missing it is that, unlike most credits, it is a refundable credit -- meaning that you can get money back from the federal government even if you don't owe any tax. Depending on how many eligible kids you have, we're talking about credits of as much as $3,250 to $6,044. Other credits can also bring in big money. Whether it's the American Opportunity Tax Credit for education or the Child Tax Credit and Child and Dependent Care Credit for families, make sure not to miss out on any chance you have to cut your tax bill. Make Sure Your Money Goes to the Right Place For those of you expecting a refund, waiting can be the hardest part. Yet if you give the IRS the wrong information, it can be a lot harder for you to receive your hard-earned tax money back. Direct-deposit options are a great way to get your refund, with turnaround times that are much faster than with mailed refunds, especially in combination with electronically filed tax returns. But it's essential that you get your bank account information correct, paying attention to your financial institution's routing number, your account number and your type of account. Make a mistake, and you could end up in IRS refund limbo -- especially if the incorrect information you use corresponds to someone else's existing bank account. There are plenty of other mistakes that people make, but these three can be among the most costly and time-consuming to fix.

Sunday, December 28, 2014

Tesla Surges on Delivery Figures; How Boeing and Rival Airbus Compared in 2013

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) is 0.5% higher as of 2 p.m. EST after retail spending rose 0.2% in December, beating the projected 0.1% increase. Whereas previous results were pulled higher by automotive sales, December's aggregate number would have been up 0.7% without the 1.8% drop in auto sales. With that in mind as earnings season begins to ramp up, here are some industrial companies making headlines today.

Tesla Motors (NASDAQ: TSLA  ) appeared suddenly in an industry long dominated by Detroit's big three automakers, and it has successfully grown its niche in electric vehicles. Tesla's stock is surging 11% after the company announced it delivered 6,900 vehicles in the fourth quarter of 2013 -- that's 20% more vehicles than it had forecast.

Tesla also expects to grow "recklessly" in 2014 and doesn't think recent recalls of Tesla Model S chargers will hinder the company's performance in any way. Over the weekend, Tesla announced it would recall 29,000 chargers while denying that the charger itself was the cause of a fire that started in Irvine, Calif.

Meanwhile, in the aviation industry, Boeing (NYSE: BA  ) and rival Airbus continue to duke it out to be the industry leader in passenger aircraft. Last year, Airbus totaled net orders of 1,503 planes compared to 1,355 for Boeing. Those orders were valued at $225 billion for Airbus compared to $198 billion for Boeing.

While Airbus topped Boeing in orders, the latter delivered more airplanes to customers. Boeing delivered 648 airplanes, boosted by its popular 737 single-aisle airplanes, compared to Airbus' 626 deliveries. Both Airbus and Boeing still boast incredible revenue transparency with their extremely large backlogs of orders, which stand at 5,559 and 5,080 aircraft, respectively. As global fleets continue to grow and mature markets replace older passenger airplanes, both stand to capture their fair share of a market they collectively dominate.

As earnings season begins to heat up, investors watching the Dow are looking toward General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) . GE is still in a transitional period of shifting its business focus from financial services toward its industrial portfolio. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expect General Electric to report a strong rise in earnings of more than 20% to $0.53 cents a share. As the company continues through its transitional period, expect analysts to buy into the change in its business strategy; in fact, as of last quarter, General Electric's backlog rose 13% to a record high after its industrial products surged in demand during the U.S. energy boom and the commercial-aircraft rebound.

Dividend stocks like Boeing are poised to outperform
One of the dirty secrets that few finance professionals will openly admit is that dividend stocks as a group handily outperform their non-dividend-paying brethren. The reasons for this are too numerous to list here, but you can rest assured that it's true. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor's portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.

An alternative bond strategy that contains no bonds

At the dawn of a cycle of rising interest rates, some of the efforts to help financial advisers and investors move beyond the tired old fixed-income allocations of the past are refreshing.

The latest example comes from Roger Isbitts, founder and chief investment strategist at Sungarden Investment Research.

Among a handful of separate-account models at the two-year-old firm is something called the cash-flow-focused strategy, which is essentially a marriage of dividend equity and long-short investing.

By now, income-seeking investors should know that the ground is shifting and asset allocation models based on historical bond performance won't likely work.

While it might be OK to make equity allocations based on historic market returns over multiple cycles, such applications for the bond side of a portfolio could leave income-seeking investors wildly unprepared.

“It used to be that your bonds would balance your stocks, but in an era of rising rates, we can no longer count on that,” Mr. Isbitts said. “The best hedge of a stock portfolio is something that by design moves in the opposite direction of the stock market.”

In other words, you might not need bonds at all for a modern-day bond allocation.

On the surface, the Sungarden cash-flow-focused strategy is relatively straightforward.

The first of three components includes dividend stocks that are yielding a least 1 percentage point above that of the S&P 500, which is currently yielding about 2%.

“The overriding goal of the portfolio is for the total yield to be 3 percentage points over the yield of the S&P,” Mr. Isbitts explained.

That is essentially the long side of the portfolio. It will hold up to 20 stocks, and positions will be either full or half, representing either 4% or 2% of the strategy. But the strategy is extremely flexible, and the total equity allocation could range from 80% to as low as 10%, depending on the outlook and broader market analysis.

The second piece of the strategy is the hedge.

Mr. Isbitts uses broad-market-inverse exchange-traded funds for the short side of the strategy, which typically is a 20% short position.

The ultimate objective is to provide low-volatility income that looks and feels like historic bond allocations.

“In general, we have found that our equities will run somewhere in the 80-to-85 beta range if we're fully invested,” he said. “But by being fully hedged, our beta can get down to around 50.”

Mr. Isbitts! said the strategy's target beta, or percentage of the S&P's volatility, is at 50, but that he recognizes a “beta comfort zone” of between 35 and 65.

The third component of the strategy is what he describes as diversifiers or “smoothers,” which include some bank loan and master limited partnership ETFs.

“We call it a smoother component because we are buying things that have a much lower beta, but this component is not a requirement of the strategy,” he said. “It's all part of the process of getting the beta to add up to where you want it to be.”

And therein lies the key to the strategy. Like a bond allocation, it is less about the performance than it is about reducing risk.

“It's always about a risk-return tradeoff, and that's how we target the total market exposure,” he said. “The question we ask ourselves all the time is: Will the market's next 10% move be up or down?”

Saturday, December 27, 2014

As Facebook Faces Security Problem, It Becomes Ultimate Hack — Update

In light of a ”malicious external attack,” New York Times Co. (NYSE: NYT) says its nytimes.com has been offline since 3:30 p.m. EST. At this point, the site has been down for 90 minutes.

The editors have decided to republish this story from August 19:

According to a programmer who tracks Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ: FB), one of its major features has been hacked. Khalil Shreateh writes that:

Days ago i discovered a serious facebook vulnerability that allows a facebook user to post to all facebook users timeline even they are not in his friend list .

The timeline is among the most important features for Facebook users.

Khalil apparently even posted a description of the problem on founder Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook page.

The news is a reminder of which websites have to be included on the ultimate hack list for malicious programmers. A recent attack on the Outbrain links at Time Warner Inc.'s (NYSE: TWX) Time magazine, the company's CNN site and the flagship of the Washington Post Co. (NYSE: WPO) by the Syrian Electronic Army is a reminder that a group that is unlikely to be among the world's most skilled hackers can breach sites that likely have sophisticated protection.

A "takedown" of Facebook would cripple what is usually considered one of the most widely used sites on the Web, although Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) often vies for that title. Facebook has well over a billion users. It is estimated that Facebook has more than 200,000 servers in data centers spread across the world. Such a system cannot possibly have security protection that will fend off the most skilled programmers indefinitely. If these programmers can breach U.S. government sites and those of major defense contractors, they must be ahead of the ability of software companies that build walls to protect these same sites.

Depending on what research is used, including data from Facebook itself, tens upon tens of millions of people use Facebook each day. A relatively high number of those people spend an hour or more per day on the social network. A major hack of Facebook would crash a system that may be among the largest communications tools in the world.

A hack of Facebook may not be equivalent to one of the Department of Defense. However, a breach in the social network's collection of users' data and identities could set back social network use by years, as well as make the public wary of giving out any personal data at all online.

Someone, or someones, sometime soon will make a major hack to Facebook. It is the Holy Grail of hacks, which makes it irresistible.

Thursday, December 25, 2014

Can Microsoft Prove That Apple's Out of Touch?

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) is credited with modernizing smartphone operating systems with touch-optimized interfaces. Before the iPhone, it was hardware buttons for all phones, which are a rare breed nowadays. The iPhone maker subsequently brought the same paradigm to tablets.

There's been one category that Apple has decidedly not brought touch interfaces to: traditional PCs. Apple's decision not to pursue the segment comes from the inevitable ergonomic challenges. That's potentially an opening for rivals, and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT  ) has set out with Windows 8 to prove that Apple is out of touch.

One way, or the other
Thus far, consumers have faced a tough dilemma when considering Windows 8 adoption. Traditional Windows laptops can typically be bought for $500 or less, but models with touchscreens come at a premium and cost $600 to $700. Windows 8 was absolutely built with touch in mind, even though it technically supports traditional input methods like a keyboard and mouse.

Consumers don't want to spend more, but they also want a full Windows 8 experience. Indecision stemming from this difficult choice has contributed to the PC slowdown.

However, that may all change by 2016. Market researcher IHS estimates that nearly 25% of all laptops shipped by 2016 will have touchscreens. Last year, there were a total of 4.6 million touchscreen laptops shipped, a figure that's expected to skyrocket to 24 million this year. That comparison is a little specious though, since this category only started shipping meaningfully in the fourth quarter alongside Windows 8. IHS believes that the market for touchscreen laptops will reach 78 million by 2016, or 25% of all laptops.

This potential adoption curve will be driven by falling prices for capacitive touchscreen display panels, with 2013 expected to be an inflection point. Costs are expected to get cut in half this year, which would inevitably translate into lower retail prices. Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) will play a role here, using its weight in component supply chains to help push down costs.

Intel ecosystem development exec Zane Ball makes it clear that Intel's goal is to "unlock new demand." The chip giant sees touchscreen PCs in general as a segment with "substantial" growth opportunities. Anything that helps boost PC units will benefit Intel, even if it's not the one selling touchscreen microcontroller components directly. Intel is doing what it can to make sure OEMs have sufficient supply of inexpensive touchscreens.

Apple's global PC market share hovers around 5%. If the forecast turns out accurate, then investors could be looking at less than 4 million touchscreen Macs (if Apple were to release such models). That's not a game-changing figure, especially since it wouldn't be incremental and would inevitably cannibalize regular Macs.

More importantly, if touchscreen laptop adoption were to hit 25%, it would be incontrovertible evidence that touchscreen laptops are here to stay, which would in turn necessitate a competitive response from Apple.

There's no doubt that Apple is at the center of technology's largest revolution ever, and that longtime shareholders have been handsomely rewarded with over 1,000% gains. However, there is a debate raging as to whether Apple remains a buy. The Motley Fool's senior technology analyst and managing bureau chief, Eric Bleeker, is prepared to fill you in on reasons to buy and reasons to sell Apple, and what opportunities are left for the company (and your portfolio) going forward. To get instant access to his latest thinking on Apple, simply click here now.

900 Million Reasons Android Is Winning

At the Google (NASDAQ: GOOG  ) I/O conference last week, Google bragged that Android has enjoyed over 900 million device activations to date, nearly twice that of Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) 500 million iOS devices sold. However, there is more to the story than just sheer numbers. In this video, Fool contributor Steve Heller explains to Erin Miller why he thinks Android is an underestimated power.

As one of the most dominant Internet companies ever, Google has made a habit of driving strong returns for its shareholders. However, like many other web companies, it's also struggling to adapt to an increasingly mobile world. Despite gaining an enviable lead with its Android operating system, the market isn't sold. That's why it's more important than ever to understand each piece of Google's sprawling empire. In The Motley Fool's new premium research report on Google, we break down the risks and potential rewards for Google investors. Simply click here now to unlock your copy of this invaluable resource.

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Fake Emails Foul Up Holiday Shopping for Many Consumers

shopping enter key Getty Images

Millions of emails a day are being sent to consumers around the country with confirmations of what appear to be online shopping orders but are really fakes tied to damaging computer malware and other trickery. Because so many real order confirmations are flying into in-boxes, these phony emails aren't as obvious as they might otherwise be. And those behind the phony emails make them resemble those sent by legitimate retailers, including Target (TGT), Walmart (WMT), Best Buy (BBY), Home Depot (HD) and Costco (COST), according to security blogger Brian Krebs.

I am afraid more people will fall victims to hackers this year than ever before.

"The holiday season make us feel better. We become more trusting and, of course, more vulnerable," said DeVry University information sciences professor Rajin Koonjbearry. "We are also in a rush to get things done before the end of the year. Hackers seize the opportunity to prey on our holiday mood." And he had a stark prediction: "I am afraid more people will fall victims to hackers this year than ever before." The first wave of emails connected to the scam went out around Black Friday and Cyber Monday but have shown no sign of abating. The emails come with such subject lines as: "Thank you for your order," "Order Confirmation," "Acknowledgment of Order" and "Order Status," according to the computer security company Malcovery Security. Those who click on the links risk triggering malware that can infect their computers and steal such things as your passwords. In addition, computer security experts like Krebs say the malware can put victims' computers under the control of cyber-thieves. Before clicking on any links in an email, be sure it's from a legitimate source. The phony emails might say they're coming from a retailer that you could have used, but the email addresses that they're being sent from won't match up with Walmart.com, Target.com and other obviously authentic addresses. DeVry's Koonjbearry offers the following tips:

If an email looks suspicious, delete it. Be cautious clicking email links. Keep your passwords secure. Update anti-virus software regularly. Shop on secure websites. Get rid of apps you don't use. More from Mitch Lipka
•Want to Get the Most Out of Your Gift Cards? Here's How •Lenovo Recalls 544,000 Laptop Power Cords •The 'Worst Toy of the Year' and Why It's So Bad

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

7 Times It Costs More to Pay With a Credit Card

These days, it often seems unnecessary to carry cash or even your checkbook, as credit cards are accepted just about everywhere. Though you might not realize it, however, paying with plastic can cost you. Some merchants add an extra surcharge or convenience fee onto each credit card transaction, effectively penalizing you for using your credit card.

Below are some payments you might want to rethink using your credit card for.

1. Overseas Purchases
If you've never traveled internationally, you'll be in for an unpleasant surprise when you realize that, with many credit cards, you'll have to pay a foreign transaction fee for every purchase. Fees average about 3 percent, but can vary greatly by card. While 3 percent might seem small, it can add up very quickly when tacked on to each and every one of your purchases. Combat this issue by paying in the country's native currency as much as possible, or opening a credit card that doesn't charge foreign transaction fees.

2. College Tuition
College tuition might be one of the most costly expenses you'll ever incur, but putting the balance on your credit card won't help matters. Many colleges and universities do not directly accept credit card payments, due to pricey processing fees, but they do allow you to pay through a third-party vendor.

However, you'll be forced to pay a surcharge, typically around 2.25 percent. The best way to avoid this fee is to write a check, but if that's not an option, you're better off taking out a Stafford loan. Not only are interest rates lower, you'll also be able to create a customized payment plan that fits your budget -- neither is possible when using a credit card.

3. Small Businesses
Some retailers, often times smaller businesses, will add a surcharge onto your final bill if you pay with a credit card to offset the processing fees. These merchants are required to inform you of the fee prior to charging it and are not permitted to charge more than the merchant discount rate for the credit card transaction.

In fact, they're never allowed to charge more than 4 percent. It's important to note that there are laws limiting surcharging in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah. Avoid this surcharge by keeping cash tucked away in your wallet to use when in this situation or pay with your debit card.

4. Rent
If you want to put your rent on your credit card to rack up rewards points or because you haven't received your paycheck yet, you might be in for an unpleasant surprise. Many rental companies charge a convenience fee for making a rent payment online. This is a fixed amount that doesn't change, even if the size of your bill fluctuates. If you have the funds in your checking account, it's best to simply write out a check to give to your landlord each month, so you're not stuck with added fees on top of your rent payment.

5. Parking Tickets
There are few things in life more frustrating than returning to your car and finding a parking ticket tacked onto the windshield. Unfortunately, that parking ticket often gets even more expensive if you opt to pay it online using a credit card, as many municipalities charge a convenience fee to offset the processing charge. Skip the processing fee by writing a check and mailing it in or heading to the parking authority to pay the fine in person.

6. Movie Tickets
Don't want to wait in line for tickets at the movie theater? Easy, purchase tickets from Fandango! However, you'll have to pay a convenience fee for this luxury, which is usually about $1.25 per ticket. If you're less-than-thrilled about paying even more for your movie ticket, simply get to the theater early, buy your tickets, then head out to dinner before the show -- no risk of encountering a sold out movie.

7. Federal Income Taxes
If you're like most people, you want to get your income taxes paid as quickly and easily as possible -- which might mean heading to your computer and paying online with a credit card. However, you should be aware that the third-party processing companies used by the IRS charge a convenience fee for this service, based on the total amount of your payment. Avoid this fee by writing a check and sending it into the IRS. Just be sure to allow yourself plenty of time, so it's postmarked by the due date.

Using a credit card to pay for goods and services is typically the most convenient method, but not always the cheapest. Before automatically defaulting to plastic to pay for your purchases, make sure the merchant won't charge you extra for doing so.

This article originally appeared on Go Banking Rates.

Bank of America + Apple? This device makes it possible.
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its destined to change everything from banking to health care. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early, in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here! 

Monday, December 22, 2014

DraghiĆ¢€™s Dangerous German Stand-Off

I've written a number of columns over the last two months on the growing rift between Mario Draghi and Germany, for example here and here.  Now Reuters has published a detailed report that provides plenty of fresh color on the deteriorating relationship, not least between the European Central Bank president and Jens Weidmann, the president of Germany's Bundesbank, which is said to be "totally rotten, broken beyond repair."  The risks arising from this rift cannot be overstated.

The reality is that Mario Draghi brought this situation upon himself. He overplayed his hand in August and September, first in his speech at the annual central banker's jamboree at Jackson Hole, when he effectively told Germany to boost spending to deliver a fiscal stimulus to the eurozone, and secondly in September, when he got the ECB to back a QE-lite program and introduced the size of the ECB’s balance sheet as a policy target, thereby appearing to pre-commit the ECB to buying government bonds. These two sudden shifts took his colleagues, the markets and, crucially, German officials by surprise.

What has struck me in the intervening weeks is that opposition to Mr. Draghi’s direction of travel is equally strong in both Berlin and Frankfurt: in other words, he is up against both the Bundesbank and the German government. Although the Bundesbank has been careful not to close the door to QE, it is very hard to imagine the circumstances under which it would ever give its consent—and what makes the Bundesbank such a formidable opponent for Mr. Draghi isn’t the formal power that it possesses, which is limited, but the extent to which it shapes and reflects German public opinion.

By the same token, German officials have made it abundantly clear to me that if Mr. Draghi ever tries to buy government bonds, the ECB should be under no illusions that it will face multiple legal challenges from Germany and that the finance ministry will come under intense pressure to mount a challenge itself. If Mr. Draghi didn’t know it before, he must now realize that the political firestorm that would surround any decision to launch QE would be so destabilizing and do such damage to the ECB's credibility that it would undermine whatever good he hoped to achieve.

As I wrote in my column on Monday, this fight over QE in is shaping up to be—alongside the equally brutal fight over the French and Italian budgets—the defining ideological struggle over the future of Europe. Mr. Draghi got the job because he managed to convince the German public that he was more German than the Germans. The suspicion is hardening that he may be Italian after all.

This standoff with Germany has already damaged Mr. Draghi: at October’s ECB news conference, he was forced to row back on what he’d said the previous month, denying that the ECB had any target for the size of its balance sheet and thereby confusing the markets. At the IMF meetings in Washington this month, I got the distinct impression that a orchestrated “Support Mario” operation was under way, as loyal policy makers tried to explain away the inconsistencies between his September and October statements, and die-hard QE enthusiasts such as the International Monetary Fund suddenly seemed to go quiet on the subject while going out of their way to say what a good job Mr. Draghi was doing.

Indeed, the more people praised him, the more I felt sorry for him. Over the past three years, Mr. Draghi has proved himself to be a skillful central banker and a formidable politician. But he now finds himself forced to take sides between those who believe that QE-driven devaluation, cheaper borrowing costs and higher inflation offer the only path out of Europe's current malaise and those who believe not only that QE will do little to stimulate sustainable growth but that it is a backdoor route to a mutualization of eurozone debts and monetary financing of governments illegal under EU treaties. Worse, he has revealed his own allegiances, raising expectations he may now not be able to meet.

That is not a position in which any central banker would want to find himself.

(Other) Investors Will Hate You for Using This Investment Strategy

In the past couple of weeks, we've been seeing record highs in the markets nearly every day.

However, we saw a pretty scary headline earlier this week about the Nasdaq Composite Index.

On Monday, Bloomberg reported that nearly half of the stocks in the tech-centric Nasdaq have declined 20% from their highs of the past 12 months - putting them in "bear territory."

Now this decline is mostly in small caps, which I don't cover in Strategic Tech Investor. However, Nasdaq small caps are not the only place we're seeing jitters in the overall market.

Even with interest rates so low and the economy steadily improving, many nervous investors - worried about a correction - are selling off.

Whenever there's this sort of negative noise in the air, I tell you it's not a time to sell - but a profit opportunity for tech investors.

So, today I want to share with you three strategies designed to turn market declines to your financial advantage.

With them, you'll leave the nervous sellers in the dust...

Reduce Risk and Increase Profits

This week's negative headlines remind me of a conversation we had earlier this year.

On April 11, I noted that some pundits were talking of a tech crash in the making. My note cut to the chase and said, "It's not time to panic... It's time to buy."

Since then, the Nasdaq has posted 15.16% gains. That's nearly double the Dow's 7.7% profits and significantly higher than the S&P 500's 10.85% gains.

I'm not pointing this out to brag (well, maybe a little) but to show you that when I say the road to wealth is paved with tech, I'm using empirical data to make that statement.

Sure, there are periods when tech goes out of favor. But that is true for every single sector of the U.S. economy, from finance to consumer goods to construction.

But over the long haul, high tech presents investors with the greatest number of opportunities to beat the market. After all, tech is where most new opportunities come from in the first place.

So, I haven't lost even a small amount of confidence about tech's wealth-building abilities. But it does pay to be prepared for market corrections.

With that in mind, here are three risk-control strategies that will help you build more wealth.

Risk-Reduction Profits Strategy No. 1

Focus on Quality

Before revealing my first risk-reduction strategy, let me welcome any new readers with us this week.

When I launched Strategic Tech Investor in the spring of 2013, I provided details of my five-part system for creating tech wealth. And I encourage the newcomers among us to peruse those first few columns after reading today's report.

I designed these five rules to find you high-quality companies. These are companies whose stocks have the baked-in ability to double and triple your money.

And all these companies have several things in common. Great leadership is imperative. You're looking for a CEO with a proven track record of making money for shareholders.

We also want to find well-run companies. These firms have a track record of earnings growth and excellent operating margins, preferably higher than 20%.

At the same time, the companies we choose are leaders in fields that will grow for years to come, such as cloud computing, Big Data, and the mobile revolution.

Focusing on quality greatly stacks the deck in your favor during good times and bad. In fact, tough markets often bring what I call "a flight to quality" - stocks so good that investors gladly buy on the dip.

Risk-Reduction Profits Strategy No. 2

Work Your Shopping List

People grouse all the time about not being able to find good stocks. I think that's lack of discipline, however, not a lack of good stocks.

In fact, you don't even have to be an active investor to come across more good stocks than you can buy at any one point in time.

This is where being a disciplined and focused investor comes in handy. You should be looking for proven winners, not just buying cheap stocks and hoping they go up.

You are going to find intriguing companies that you just can't act on for any number of reasons. Never throw an idea away. Just put those stocks on your "shopping list" for a day when you are ready to pounce.

Trust me, that day will come. Maybe you want to close out a big winner, or perhaps you need to cut a couple of weak performers from the portfolio - or we could always get a market correction and you get stopped out of a few positions.

That's why it pays to have a list of stocks you'd really like to buy when the time is right, such as right now when many quality stocks are trading at a discount.

Then there's "the winners that got away." Those are the market leaders you heard about too late to get in on but you'd love to buy on a correction.

That's one of the reasons why we discuss so many stocks at Strategic Tech Investor. I want you to have the world's best tech investing shopping list.

Risk-Reduction Profits Strategy No. 3

Make Split Entries

This is a process I use all the time. It's a great way to move into a potential big winner in a bull market and make sure you don't overpay. Plus, you also pick up extra profits.

For example, let's say XYZ Mobile Corp. has been on your shopping list. It was trading at $33 but has since retreated to $25, a price your research reveals to be a great bargain.

You enter this position in a series of tranches. This could be as few as two or as many as four. Let's keep it simple and look at a two-tiered entry. In this case, we buy half at market at a price of $25 a share but with no stop loss.

As soon the market order fills, you then enter what's called a "lowball limit order." What this means is that you tell your broker that you want to buy a second tranche of XYZ Mobile at a much lower price. A 20% discount is a good principle for filling the second half.

You would then enter a "limit order" for the second round of XYZ at a price of $20 or lower. If the stock falls to that price, your order automatically fills, and you now have an average purchase price of $22.50.

Once the stock resumes its climb, you have baked in extra profits. For instance, when XYZ hits $30 a share, your cumulative gains are now better than 33%. ($30 minus $22.50 divided by $22.50 equals 33.3%.)

Had you simply bought the stock and held, your returns would have been 20%. Split entries are a powerful way to ride out market retreats and make extra money in the long run.

Now then, whenever I discuss portfolio management, I invariably get a question or two about complex hedging strategies. That's really beyond the scope of what we do here at Strategic Tech Investor.

Fact is, Wall Street has an army of experts who run sophisticated hedging strategies on supercomputers all day long. Individual investors just can't do anything remotely that complicated.

However, you can "hire" these pros at a fraction of what Wall Street pays them. You do this by investing in "inverse" exchange-traded funds (ETFs). As the term implies, inverse ETFs often short popular benchmarks.

For instance, the PowerShares QQQ (Nasdaq: QQQ) is an ETF that serves as a tracking stock for the Nasdaq 100. There is also an inverse ETF that basically shorts QQQ, giving you insurance against tech declines.

It's the ProShares Short QQQ (NYSE: PSQ). The good thing about this type of inverse ETF is that it pays you when the Nasdaq drops roughly on a 1-to-1 basis. For every percentage point the index goes down, PSQ rises by that amount.

However, this is really a very short-term play you must use with caution. Holding an inverse ETF like PSQ for more than a few days could end up costing you money.

After all, when the Nasdaq rallies again, PSQ goes down.

So, you now have three long-term strategies and a short-term "bonus play" you can use to keep your portfolio moving forward during any market retreats that may come our way.

And if you put these tools to good use, you'll find you have the skills to profit when other investors panic.

This isn't the only high-profit strategy Michael's looking at in Strategic Tech Investor. He consistently gets maximum tech profits for his readers - and he does it free. To subscribe, just click here.

Sunday, December 21, 2014

Can This Apple, Inc. Supplier Deliver in 2015?

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) has, for quite a while now, designed its own applications processors for its iDevices. Samsung (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF  ) , a longtime supplier and competitor to Apple, has been the sole manufacturer of these chips.

But it is widely rumored that Apple will be moving its chip business to independent semiconductor foundry Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE: TSM  )  for the iPhone 6.

That said, concerns about whether TSMC will be able to capture the chip business for Apple's follow-on to the iPhone 6 surfaced last month. TSMC's management remarked on its July earnings call that it would not begin mass production on its next-generation 16-nanometer manufacturing technology until late 2015. This would be too late for the successor to the iPhone 6, which is likely to launch in the fall of 2015. 

Digitimes now reports, though, that TSMC "will advance volume production on its 16nm process to the first quarter of 2015 with monthly output of 50,000 wafers in order to meet demand for Apple's A9 processors."

A question that may be on investors' minds, then, is whether TSMC can actually achieve this rumored production schedule, and if so, what doing so might mean from a financial perspective.

What appears to be going on
Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor are moving to a fundamentally new transistor structure known as a FinFET for their respective 14/16-nanometer technologies. This transistor type, according to Intel  (NASDAQ: INTC  ) -- which has been successfully mass-producing FinFET-based chips since late 2011 -- offers significant performance improvements and power reductions over more traditional "planar" transistors. 

The light gray line represents the performance of a hypothetical 22-nanometer "planar" transistor. The black line represents the performance Intel's 32-nanometer transistor, and the blue one the performance of Intel's 22-nanometer FinFET transistor. Source: Intel

Unfortunately, these FinFETs seem to be proving very difficult for the foundries to bring into high volume production.

KLA-Tencor (NASDAQ: KLAC  ) , a major semiconductor equipment vendor, offered investors some insight into this issue on its April earnings call. 

Now, in logic and foundry, with the introduction of the new 3D gate architectures, the yield issues our customers are grappling with today are proving the most challenging that the industry have ever faced, and even the smallest variation and process margin can cause significant yield losses for these devices.[Emphasis mine]

Now, notice that KLA-Tencor's CEO cited "significant yield losses," which means that when a chip wafer is produced, a large portion of the chips that come out aren't suitable for sale.

How can TSMC just "advance" production?
The reason that good yields are so important is that yields directly affect cost. If a chip wafer costs $3,000 to make and from that one can get 300 good chips, the cost to produce those chips is $10 each. However, if due to yield losses, one can only get 150 good chips, then the cost per chip balloons to $20.

Now, according to an EETimes piece, TSMC shifted to charging customers on a per-wafer basis rather than a per-good-chip basis over the last several years.

Given this context, what could "advancing production" of 16-nanometer, particularly if yields are proving challenging, mean economically for both Apple and TSMC? 

Got yield?
To provide some background, according to a 2009 wafer agreement between IDT and TSMC published on the SEC's website, TSMC and IDT agree to a "minimum" or "standard" yield. This standard yield is "based on the average Yield of the first three hundred (300) Wafers of each Product manufactured using Qualified Processes and passing all production tests."

The agreement further stipulates, "Any Wafer manufactured by TSMC that yields less than sixty five percent (65%) of the standard Yield for such Product shall, if sorted by TSMC, be scrapped, or, [...] be deemed defective and returnable for replacement."

While the agreement between TSMC and IDT is unlikely to be identical to the one between TSMC and Apple, the basic idea is probably similar.

The next question to ask, then, is if TSMC and Apple are really gunning to get 16-nanometer chips into the 2015 iPhone, who will eat the cost of the low yields, should they persist?

Will TSMC, in a bid to keep Apple's business, offer really cheap wafers to offset the relatively low yield per wafer (and keep this business away from arch-rival, Samsung)? Or will Apple, in a bid to minimize its reliance on Samsung, be willing to buy more, "full-price" wafers from TSMC and agree to a lower yield requirement?

Foolish bottom line
Only time will tell which chip manufacturer will actually wind up with Apple's business for the 2015 iPhone/iPad devices. But given that Digitimes has claimed on separate occasions that both Samsung and TSMC have "won" this business, the "behind-the-scenes" battle is extremely interesting.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

Saturday, December 20, 2014

Dow Earnings: Is It the Big Mac, or the Little Wallet?

“Oh, to be back in the land of Coca-Cola (KO),” Bob Dylan once sang, and the lyric popped in our head this morning, because the news crossing the Tape on Tuesday – big, blue-chip earnings reports and key consumer data – provides a pretty good look at how things are in the land of Coca-Cola.

Tuesday is a big day for Dow components. Six of the index’s 30 members report earnings (five before the bell, one after market close), providing an unusually good “tell” on the state of the consumer both here in the U.S. and globally.

Coca-Cola, McDonald's (MCD), DuPont, United Technologies (UTX) and Verizon (VZ) all reported earnings before the bell. Microsoft reports after the market closes. The Street was not impressed. Of the five that reported, only Verizon is higher in midday trading; the others are all in the red, with Coke down 3%. That’s on a day when the Dow itself is up about 70 points.

Revenue growth tells you why. Verizon’s revenue rose 7.5% to $21.5 billion from the year prior period. United Technology saw revenue up 7.4% to $17.2 billion. McDonald’s rose 1% to $7.2 billion. For Coke, it was down 1% to $12.6 billion. DuPont’s also slipped to $9.7 billion from $9.8 billion.  None of those are particularly strong numbers.

Of that group, Coke, McDonald’s and Verizon probably give the cleanest read of the consumer. The first two saw familiar struggles, and the latter’s nifty increase came with an asterisk.

Verizon found itself getting a big boost from tablet sales, which helped it draw in about 50% more customers than it did a year ago. “Tablets are extremely good for the industry, not just for Verizon,” CFO Fran Shammo said. The rub? That growth came amid heavy promotions, some of which included giving customers a free tablet with existing accounts.

McDonald’s same-store sales were down 1.5%, which the company attributed to “negative comparable guest traffic amid ongoing broad-based challenges.” In other words, the company is saying that the problem isn’t the quality of the Big Mac but the quantity of spare cash in their customers’ wallets.

For the S&P 500 companies as a whole, this is looking like another lackluster earnings season. With about a quarter of the companies having reported, Thomson Reuters is pegging second-quarter earnings growth at 5.1% overall, and that once again is a disappointment; on July 1, growth was pegged at 6.2%, the firm said. On Jan. 1, the estimate was for 9.7%.  Revenue growth is now expected to be a modest 3.4%.

The question is: Do these corporate reports speak to broader issues? Coke, for example, saw flat soda volume in North America. Is that about consumer purchasing power, or changing tastes?

This morning’s reports on consumer prices and wages help provide an answer. Consumer prices, including food and energy and not seasonally adjusted, were up about 2.1% from a year ago. Adjusting for that inflation, average hourly wages were actually down 0.1% in June from a year ago.

In other words, even that relatively mild amount of inflation is more than consumer wages can compensate for, which explains the weak revenue growth, and consequently implies that McDonald’s problems are more about their customers’ wallets than the Big Macs.

Friday, December 19, 2014

6 Ridiculous Bank Fees Buried in the Fine Print

Magnifying glass focussed on small print Getty Images Americans really care about banking fees, but are hapless at skirting them. Less than a third of all bank accounts come attached with no fees at all, while expenses are rising on accounts that do. The median overdraft fee, for example, has crept to $34 per transaction, or roughly a 17,000 percent annual percentage rate for taking out 20 bucks at the ATM, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. A February GOBankingRates poll found fees are the No. 1 factor that sway consumers' banking decisions, with 45 percent of respondents saying they decide where to bank based on fee structures - more than rates, customer service and accessibility combined. Yet in 2013, banks earned $31.8 billion in overdraft fees alone. That could be because customers don't realize how much they're giving up in fees. Of the 30 percent of Americans who frequently overdraw, half do it because they don't know their account balances. A sixth say they overdraw because their banks' overdraft policies are too confusing. Overdrafts are just the tip of the iceberg, too. The average checking account comes with about 30 fees, according to WalletHub, and not all of them are as easy to predict as overdraft or monthly service charges. Here are some of the sneakier fees that come attached to your standard bank account -- and how you can make sure they don't deplete your savings. 1. Reordered Overdraft Fees According to a 2014 survey from Pew Charitable Trusts, almost half of all major banks reorder checking account transactions so that they post by size, not the order in which they were made. For bank customers who are susceptible to overdrawing their accounts, this switch could cause one overdraft charge to balloon into three or four. Banks that employ this practice (almost all of the major ones except for Citibank (C)) say they do this so that larger and more important expenses like mortgage payments clear first. The actual result is that consumers overdraw their accounts sooner and more often, with each subsequent overdraft racking up another 30-something dollars. If you overdraw your account because of posting order, your best bet is probably to appeal the charge to the bank -- although appealing any kind of bank fees can be tough, said Warren Taylor, president of BankMobile. "If one carries high balances, some banks will negotiate the fees with you -- but most banks require their branches to keep 92 to 98 percent of fees charged," he said. "If you don't have a lot of money, you are in trouble. You can appeal to the regulator of the bank or the CFPB to intercede on your behalf if you feel the fees are abusive." 2. $5 Charge to Overdraft This is a service Bank of America (BAC) rolled out this year with its SafeBalance account, a product that promises account holders won't have to pay overdraft charges -- just a $4.95 monthly fee. Any time you try to spend more than the balance in your account, your transaction is declined. Of course, this is an option that's technically available to anyone, regardless of fee. The Federal Reserve ruled in 2010 that consumers have to opt-in to overdraft protection in order to be charged, otherwise their cards should be rejected. Opt-in to these types of services and you're basically paying the bank for the favor of not lending you money. If your bank offers you overdraft protection upon account opening (and per the 2010 law, it has to offer it, not just automatically apply it), don't take it. You're also allowed to opt out of overdraft protection later on, so if you're a chronic overspender, contact your bank and ask to have the service turned off. If you want to go a step further, Elle Kaplan, founder of LexION Capital Management, recommends staying away from debit cards altogether. "Think about forgoing a debit card, which links directly to your checking account, in favor of an ATM card, which only allows you to withdraw cash," she said. "I've always opted for an ATM-only card because in case of loss or theft, someone can't simply take the card and start charging purchases to your account." And, as always, carefully monitor your account activity to keep your likelihood of overdrawing to a minimum. "Keep careful track of how much money is in your account at any one time so that you're never hit with an overdraft fee," Kaplan said. "Pay special attention to any automatic transfers and make sure that you've always got enough money in your account to cover them. Set up reminders in your calendar to check." 3. Big Deposit Fee This one falls in the "I'm sorry your diamond shoes are too tight" category: Many banks have started charging their biggest customers fees for parking large amounts of cash in their accounts, even though big deposits are part of what fuel financial institutions. It's basically the opposite of a minimum balance fee and it's wholly avoidable. If you're wealthy enough for this to be an issue, you shouldn't be keeping all your cash in one account anyway; the FDIC only insures total deposits at a single institution for up to $250,000 per depositor. Follow Warren Buffett's advice and keep your money in a number of safe, low-cost, long-term investments, like index funds. If you're saving for a specific goal -- such as retirement -- you probably want to park your savings in a specialized product, such as a tax-advantaged Roth IRA or 401(k). 4. Early Account Closure Fee Banks began charging a fee for closing account within months of opening after 2011's first Bank Transfer Day, in which hundreds of thousands of former bank customers closed their accounts and joined local credit unions in protest of -- yep -- predatory fee structures. The amount of time required to keep an account open and the fee charged if you don't can vary by institution, but in general, this expense can be pretty hefty, around $25 to $50 at most major banks. 5. Returned Mail Fee If you move, don't forget to fill out a change-of-address form online or at your local post office. If your bank statements are sent back marked "return to sender," you could incur a fee, usually around $5, which banks say is justified because returned mail often triggers extra fraud protection. You can also avoid this charge by going paperless completely and opting for e-statements, a choice your bank might even reward you for with a higher interest rate or waived service fee. (Banks are fans of paperless correspondence too, because it means they can save money on postage costs.) Check to see if your financial institution offers any incentives for making the switch. 6. Minimum Balance Fee They're usually not even hidden in the fine print, but these charges can easily sneak up on you, especially if you change your depositing habits. Most bank accounts have a minimum balance threshold you have to clear in order to waive a monthly service fee - say, $1,000 to avoid a $12 recurring expense. Often, the higher the interest rate on the account, the higher your minimum balance requirement, though many institutions also waive the charge if you have a regular, automated incoming deposit. Like many fees, these kinds of monthly service charges are the hardest on depositors with less reliable income streams. Te-Erika Patterson, a freelance writer, said she recently noticed she'd been charged a $12 service fee on her Bank of America account. "When I looked it up, it was a fine print penalty for not maintaining a certain amount in my account for the month and not receiving any direct deposits over $250," she said. The solution is to find an account with a low minimum balance requirement or a monthly fee that's more easily waived; some accounts will let you duck it by just signing up for e-statements. But if you don't want to switch accounts or banks, there might be a few creative ways to get around the charge. "To remedy the issue, I just take money from my Paypal account and withdraw it into my bank account every month," Patterson said. "That counts as a direct deposit."

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Can America Make Stuff Anymore?

Mid Adult worker with yellow helmet against factory interior Dominik Pabis/Getty Images Do you want to buy clothes that are made in America? And are you willing to pay what it costs to help bring manufacturing jobs back to America -- and be once again able to buy quality goods that will last, in return for your money? Words and Actions Most Americans answer yes to the first question -- initially, at least. A New York Times poll last year found 46 percent of shoppers saying they would happily pay the same price -- or even a bit of a premium -- to own clothing made in America, as opposed to clothing made in China, Vietnam or another foreign country. Yet according to American-made apparel manufacturer Buck Mason, less than 3 percent of clothing is made in America. Why is this? Many products made in America sell for prices far higher than what similar products made elsewhere cost. What's more, even if you are willing to pay the premium for quality (the Times poll noted that 56 percent of Americans say American-made clothing is of higher quality than imports), Buck Mason laments: "it is virtually impossible to go to a mall anywhere, and find a high-quality, American-made garment" today. So there are really two problems for shoppers looking to "buy American" today. First, you can't find such goods to buy. Second, if you do find them, they cost too much. American Apparel One company trying to fix the first problem is Los Angeles-based American Apparel (APP). A vertically integrated clothing company (meaning it owns and operates its own retail stores, selling its own clothing), American Apparel makes its clothing in the U.S. and sells it here and abroad. Despite charging prices that can be twice the cost of imports, however, American Apparel has struggled to earn a profit. The company ran into difficulties with its financial auditor in 2010 and suffered through a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation as a result. Sales growth has been anemic; American Apparel is losing money; and at last report, the company was $235 million in debt. Adding existential crisis to injury, American Apparel just ousted CEO Dov Charney, setting the stage for a nasty lawsuit with him. Giant retailer Walmart (WMT) is having different difficulties with the made-in-America business model. You've probably heard that Walmart plans to spend an additional "$50 billion" over the next 10 years, buying American-made goods to sell in its stores. However, after contributing to the dearth of supply in the first place -- by pushing suppliers to cut prices, forcing many of them to close up shop in the U.S. and move manufacturing abroad -- Walmart is scrambling to find businesses that still make stuff in America, to stock its shelves and help it fulfill its promise. American Prices And what about the second part of the problem: price? With the falling cost of energy in the U.S. resulting from the shale oil boom, advances in manufacturing technology such as 3-D printing and rising cost of labor elsewhere, you'd think U.S.-made goods would be getting more cost-competitive. So why do they still cost so much? Buck Mason co-founder Sasha Koehn points the finger at the multiple links in the supply chain that clothing passes through today en route from manufacturer to retailer. If a T-shirt from Thailand sells for $10 wholesale, for example, then delivery to industry showrooms, sales to wholesalers, resales to retailers and final sales to consumers can push the price tag on that tee up past $50. Koehn notes that the garment industry standard is for prices to get marked up as much as 800 percent between manufacture and retail. A Modest Solution Buck Mason is challenging industry norms with a two-pronged approach. First, the company limits price mark-ups with a "direct-to-consumer" model, manufacturing clothing in-house, then selling over the Internet to customers. By cutting out the middleman, Koehn says he's able to hold its retail prices to just twice the cost of manufacturing -- rather than 800 percent. Still, as long as American workers are paid better wages than their counterparts overseas, made-in-USA prices will remain higher than American shoppers are used to paying. (Buck Mason sells jeans for $135, belts for $72, and T-shirts for $24.) With its cost structure as low as it can go, therefore, Buck Mason focuses its efforts on ensuring customers "get what they pay for." Paying up for high-quality raw materials, Buck Mason sources leather for its belts from a century-old tannery in Chicago, for example. Koehn says that Buck Mason gets its denim from a North Carolina plant that charges $16 a yard just for the fabric. On one hand, this helps preserve American jobs and the same manufacturing base Walmart says it wants to promote. On the other hand, the higher-quality materials, Koehn says, enable it to stand behind the promise that its "30 Year Belts" and "20 Year Boots" names imply. Will this business model work? If shoppers really do mean what they say about wanting to "buy American," it just might. .