Sunday, September 30, 2012

U.S. automakers face tough times in China

FORTUNE -- No one can be blamed for forgetting Big Trouble in Little China, the 1986 adventure-comedy flop starring Kurt Russell. But U.S. automakers may be starring in its soon-to-be panned sequel: Big Trouble in Big China, with Dan Akerson, Alan Mulally, and Sergio Marchionne in leading roles.

Recent developments suggest the bonanza promised by China becoming the world's largest auto market is in danger of shrinking dramatically -- or ending altogether. This could be a big blow to General Motors (GM, Fortune 500), Ford (F, Fortune 500), and Chrysler. At issue is the inevitable cooling of China's overheated economy -- but also complicated social and political problems that lie at the heart of the Chinese system. Here are just a few of the red flags:

January auto sales in China fell sharply

LMC Automotive, the successor to J.D. Power and Associates, reports that passenger vehicle sales in China fell 23% for the first month of the year: "Although a weak market had been anticipated ... it has still come as a shock to many when solid growth has become a matter of course." That shock may include many in Detroit. GM, for instance, sells more cars in China than it does in the U.S. Sales of Buicks in China rose 2% in January, but volume for Chevrolet, a brand GM has been promoting heavily around the world, fell 16%. Ford took an even heavier beating: Its sales tumbled 42%.

Results aren't expected to be this disturbing for the rest of the year, but the trend isn't encouraging. According to sales targets compiled from 13 manufacturers, the market is expected to grow 13.5% in 2012. That is well short of the 20.4% growth rate that was predicted by manufacturers a year ago for 2011. LMC has set an even lower target for 2012 passenger vehicles: 9.2%. "We believe the market will return to a more organic growth path in the coming years," it says. Translation: The boom years are over.

End of the government gravy train

China is sharply curbing the expansion of foreign manufacturers by removing subsidies for new construction and making it more difficult for them to receive permits to expand. GM and Ford used to receive government incentives such as breaks on import duties for plant equipment and lower taxes in exchange for building new factories. But those deals expired on Jan. 31. With growth slowing, China is trying to protect its struggling domestic automakers, said to number about 70 -- some of whom reportedly made no cars at all in 2011.

Automakers that already have a presence in China shouldn't be affected in the near future.

Ford was late to the game, but it has been racing to catch up. The automaker is adding capacity for 2.3 million vehicles in the Asia Pacific region, including two new assembly plants, one new engine plant and the expansion of another one, and a new transmission plant -- all in China. Likewise, GM has a full plate in China -- for now. The biggest victim of this policy change is Chrysler. As one of a handful of global manufacturers who make nothing in China, the automaker now has even less of a chance of doing so.

Analysts have long expected China to take steps to gain more control over foreign automakers but have differed on exactly how. Some saw the nation accelerating the transfer of Western technology to itself. Indeed, fears of technology transfer were the reason why GM blocked the sale of bankrupt Saab to a Chinese manufacturer. Other observers have expected China to simply nationalize some facilities or ventures. But in any event, the message it is sending is clear: We still want you here, but we don't need you as much as we used to.

The specter of a Chinese recession

A new report by the World Bank says China could face an economic crisis unless it implements deep reforms, including scaling back its vast state-owned enterprises and making life easier for entrepreneurs.

The report, titled "China 2030, " whose contents were first reported in the Wall Street Journal, warns that growth could slow rapidly and abruptly. It cites a recently identified phenomenon that economists call the "middle-income trap," in which rapidly growing economies slow down significantly when their per capita incomes reach around $17,000 a year. The phenomenon has been observed in Greece and Ireland, among other countries, and some analysts say China could fall victim by 2015.

The report also sees a crossroads ahead for China's state-owned companies, which dominate the economy. Left to grow unchecked, they could put a damper on competition and squeeze out the spread of free-market entrepreneurism. Auto companies know all about this. China requires that Western manufacturers establish joint ventures with Chinese companies, and some of the most prominent are state-owned.

In one of the most successful such arrangements, GM is locked into long-term partnerships with the state-owned Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) that have spread even beyond China's borders. Shanghai-GM has a 9% share of the China passenger car market, while Shanghai-GM-Wuling sells more than a million small trucks and vans in China. Yet another partnership between the two companies has been formed to expand into India and Southeast Asia. As Asia-based analyst Michael Dunne has wisely observed, "SAIC has its fingers in everything GM does in China."

GM's relationship with SAIC has been tangled lately. The U.S. automaker sold a 1% interest in its primary joint venture to its partner in 2009 during the heat of the bankruptcy crisis, giving SAIC a 51% controlling interest. Lately GM has been trying to reacquire that 1% to restore the balance to an even 50-50 split, and negotiations are said to be proceeding amicably, but who knows? Given the current state of sales, politics, the economy, and industrial policy, predicting the future in China right now seems especially hazardous. 

Intel: The Dividend Stock

For the second time in the last six months, Intel (INTC) has increased its quarterly dividend. First it went from 15.75 cents to 18.12 cents per share. Now it’s going from 18.12 cents to 21 cents per share. (Just 18 months ago, Intel raised the dividend from 14 cents to 15.75 cents per share, so that’s a 50% increase in a year-and-a-half)

Going by yesterday’s closing price of $23.71, Intel now yields 3.42%. Jeff Reeves of Investorplace notes that Intel is now the fifth-highest yielding stock in the Dow.

Intel should easily make over $2.20 per share this year and next year, so the dividend is very safe. The company is also sitting on $12 billion in cash which is $2.20 per share.

I think shareholders ought to be pleased. I’m always leery when companies sit on too much cash. This is what Peter Lynch called “the Bladder Theory of Corporate Finance.” There’s nothing wrong with Intel rewarding its owners.

I also think we may being a shift in the way investors view common stocks. This could be the beginning of a period where investors place more emphasis on dividends rather than earnings growth.

In the 1990s, no one would have believed me if I told them that Intel would be looked upon as an income stock in the not-too-distant future.

Disclosure: For author disclosure, check here.

Adobe Takes The Battle With Apple On Flash Up Another Notch

Adobe (ADBE) is not giving up in its battle to convince Apple (AAPL) to changes its stance on Flash.

  • The company has bought a series of full-page ads in various newspapers – I saw it in the WSJ, the S.F. Chron and the S.J. Merc – that addresses the issue. “We (HEART) Apple,” it says in large type, which is followed by a list of other thinks they love. “We love creativity. We love innovation. We love apps. We love the web. We love Flash. We love our 3 million developers. We love healthy competition. We love touch screens. We love our Open Screen Project partners. We love HTML5. We love authoring code only once. We love all devices. We love all platforms. What we don’t love is anybody taking away your freedom to choose what you create, how you create it and what you experience on the Web.”
  • The company has launched a Web site to address the issue, which has a big “We (HEART) Choice” headline, and links to various materials supporting their case.
  • Among other things, Adobe has posted a letter from its co-chairmen and founders, Chuck Geschke and John Warnock, who make the case for open standards.

Here’s their letter, reproduced in full:

The genius of the Internet is its almost infinite openness to innovation. New hardware. New software. New applications. New ideas. They all get their chance.

As the founders of Adobe, we believe open markets are in the best interest of developers, content owners, and consumers. Freedom of choice on the web has unleashed an explosion of content and transformed how we work, learn, communicate, and, ultimately, express ourselves.

If the web fragments into closed systems, if companies put content and applications behind walls, some indeed may thrive � but their success will come at the expense of the very creativity and innovation that has made the Internet a revolutionary force.

We believe that consumers should be able to freely access their favorite content and applications, regardless of what computer they have, what browser they like, or what device suits their needs. No company � no matter how big or how creative � should dictate what you can create, how you create it, or what you can experience on the web.

When markets are open, anyone with a great idea has a chance to drive innovation and find new customers. Adobe’s business philosophy is based on a premise that, in an open market, the best products will win in the end � and the best way to compete is to create the best technology and innovate faster than your competitors.

That, certainly, was what we learned as we launched Postscript and PDF, two early and powerful software solutions that work across platforms. We openly published the specifications for both, thus inviting both use and competition. In the early days, Postscript attracted 72 clone makers, but we held onto our market leadership by out-innovating the pack. More recently, we’ve done the same thing with Adobe Flash technology. We publish the specifications for Flash � meaning anyone can make their own Flash player. Yet, Adobe Flash technology remains the market leader because of the constant creativity and technical innovation of our employees.

We believe that Apple, by taking the opposite approach, has taken a step that could undermine this next chapter of the web � the chapter in which mobile devices outnumber computers, any individual can be a publisher, and content is accessed anywhere and at any time.

In the end, we believe the question is really this: Who controls the World Wide Web? And we believe the answer is: nobody � and everybody, but certainly not a single company.

Chuck Geschke, John Warnock
Co-founders
Chairmen, Adobe Board of Directors

Stock Futures Slip as Home Prices Slide, Sears Disappoints

Stock futures fell on Tuesday, as Asian stocks fell and European markets were mixed. The Case-Shiller index showed that home prices fell 1.2% in October, dropping in 19 out of 20 cities surveyed; prices are down 32.1% from their peak.

The Conference Board is set to release confidence data at 10 a.m.

Dow futures fell 18 points to 12,199. S&P 500 futures fell 3.3 points to 1,257.

Sears (SHLD) plunged 16% in pre-market trading after issuing a disappointing forecast and announcing it plans to close up to 120 stores. Egg supplier Cal-Maine Foods (CALM) rose 7.7% on strong earnings.

Yield On Cost Vs. 4% For Your Retirement Income Stream

The financial services organization is a very powerful industry and their focus is to make money. Their advice is not all bad and making money isn't bad either; there is just one little dirty secret that you don't see or read about.

Most financial planners, bankers, and insurance representatives will tell you the rule of thumb for drawing down your portfolio for retirement is 4%, plus or minus inflation on a yearly basis. The belief in the 4% is that you will not outlive your portfolio should you live an extended life.

I guess if one invests solely for capital gains in their retirement portfolios they need a good metric to live off of. Could you imagine, at 85 years old, sleeping well at night using a 4% rule? What if the market crashed before, or during my retirement?

One thing the 4% rule does do well, it generates a lifetime of commissions for the financial professionals because at some point, you will have to sell assets (generate commissions) to give yourself income. You will also need the financial professionals' advice annually to insure your portfolio is keeping up with inflation.

Most people over their investment lifetime will not be able to save the multi-millions that the financial services industry says you will need to live a relatively nice retirement. Many advertisements and retirement calculators say you will need multi-millions so that the 4% rule will work for a 30 to 40+ year retirement.

YIELD ON COST (Y.O.C.) to the rescue! Y.O.C. is the abbreviation that the financial services industry refuses to sell to the public as a means for the everyday Joe Saver to live a comfortable retirement. Why, because Y.O.C. does not generate income for the financial professionals who need to make a living.

Yield on Cost is a compound interest formula that simply equates to making an initial investment in good quality dividend stock, reinvest all dividends, and let the compounding do its work for you. Patience is pretty important and usually at least a 5 + year time frame to reap the extreme benefits of the Y.O.C. strategy. Richard Bloch, a seeking alpha contributor, wrote an excellent piece on exactly how Y.O.C. works if you invest in just a few stocks over different time periods. Each quarterly reinvested dividend and annual dividend increase will push your Y.O.C. and your income stream higher and higher. It really is that simple.

The everyday Joe saver will struggle to even save a few hundred thousand for retirement. When financial professionals say you need to save multi-millions, Joe throws his arms in the air and says, "I'll never be able to retire, I'm just going to work forever."

Average Joe Saver, take a deep breath and let the Y.O.C. strategy help you relax. Let's pick one good quality dividend stock for Joe Saver to invest in today that offers a relatively good price, AAA rating, low beta, reliable 6% annual dividend increases, and a 3.90% starting yield - Johnson & Johnson, JNJ. If average Joe Saver could tuck away just $10,000 by age of 30, invest it today in "JNJ", in 32 years Joe would have an annual dividend stream of $53,000 with a Y.O.C. of 530% - WOW! The amazing thing about this investment is Joe most likely could retire on $53,000 in annual dividends, and his principal in JNJ is only around $275,000.

If you walked into a financial professional's office at age 62 and said, "I have $275,000 for retirement," most financial professionals would throw their arms in the air and say "keep working!" Couple that small principal amount with the power of the Y.O.C. strategy, and you just put the financial services industry out of a job!

Do you feel better about your retirement now?

Age 30, JNJ investment at $62 stock price, 3.9% yield, and 161 shares purchased:

YearIncomeYield on CostHoldings Value
1$389.303.90$10371.30
2$428.754.30$10800.05
3$473.264.74$11273.31
4$523.645.25$11796.95
5$580.845.82$12377.79
6$646.016.47$13023.80
7$720.517.22$13744.31
8$805.998.07$14550.29
9$904.459.06$15454.74
10$1018.3110.20$16473.05
11$1150.5311.53$17623.58
12$1304.7413.07$18928.31
13$1485.4114.88$20413.73
14$1698.1017.01$22111.83
15$1949.7219.53$24061.54
16$2248.9322.53$26310.47
17$2606.6826.11$28917.15
18$3036.8330.42$31953.97
19$3557.0935.64$35511.06
20$4190.2541.98$39701.31
21$4965.7749.75$44667.08
22$5922.1059.33$50589.18
23$7109.7071.23$57698.88
24$8595.4286.11$66294.30
25$10468.43104.87$76762.73
26$12848.77128.72$89611.50
27$15899.40159.28$105510.90
28$19843.59198.79$125354.49
29$24990.14250.35$150344.64
30$31770.40318.28$182115.03
31$40793.07408.67$222908.10
32$52926.39530.22$275834.49

Graph Courtesy of www.dividendcalulator.com

A small investment, patience, and time make Y.O.C. the best strategy. Plus, you only have to pay a one time commission at the initial purchase date. You don't even need a financial professional to manage your portfolio, just an online brokerage account. Most average Joe Savers can accomplish this.

Most professional investors would find using the Y.O.C. strategy for retirement boring because you're not investing in MLPs, REITS, puts, options, and other fascinating investments. I call those steroid investments and best left to the professionals and best left out of the average Joe Saver account. We will let the 4% rule manage their lives at retirement as they are looking for huge capital gains and principal accumulation.

After reading this article, there is zero excuse for anyone that wants to have a retirement income to not move forward. Really at any age, the power of the Y.O.C. strategy will supplement if not provide a full retirement for you.

My favorite website for deciding if an investment fits my Y.O.C. strategy is YOC CALCULATOR LINK.

Disclosure: I am long JNJ, PG, MCD, MO, ED.

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Top Stocks For 2011-12-5-18

 

Broadwind�s diversification into broader energy and infrastructure space gains momentum, grows U.S. jobs

NAPERVILLE, Ill– (BUSINESS WIRE) — Broadwind Energy, Inc. (Nasdaq:BWEN) will manufacture welded sub-assemblies for Caterpillar�s lines of large draglines, crawlers and excavating equipment. These components will be produced in Broadwind�s facilities in Abilene, Texas and Manitowoc, Wisconsin. This work, along with the expansion of Broadwind�s wind tower business in 2012, should create approximately 50 new jobs.

�This collaboration fits well with our strategic initiatives to leverage our core competencies beyond the wind industry and diversify our revenue base. We believe this is the first step in expanding our relationship with Caterpillar as we continue to collaborate,� said Paul Smith, president of Broadwind Towers.

About Broadwind Energy, Inc.

Broadwind Energy applies decades of deep industrial expertise to innovate integrated solutions for customers in the energy and infrastructure markets. From gears and gearing systems for wind, oil and gas and mining applications to wind towers, to comprehensive remanufacturing of gearboxes and blades, to operations and maintenance services, and specialty weldments, we have solutions for the energy needs of the future. With facilities throughout the U.S., Broadwind Energy’s talented team of 800 employees is committed to helping customers maximize performance of their investments�quicker, easier and smarter. Find out more at www.bwen.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995�that is, statements related to future, not past, events. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and include any statement that does not directly relate to a current or historical fact. In this context, forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “will” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that ultimately may not prove to be accurate. Actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The Company’s forward looking statements may include or relate to the Company’s plans to grow its business and its expectations regarding its operations, the creation of new jobs and the business of its customers; the Company�s expectations regarding its plan to restructure its operations by consolidating its operations; the sufficiency of the Company’s working capital; and the Company’s expectations regarding the state of the wind energy market generally, as well as the Company’s expectations relating to the economic downturn and the potential impact on its business and the business of its customers. For further discussion of risks and uncertainties, individuals should refer to the Company’s SEC filings. The Company undertakes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after this news release. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this news release. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

Source: Broadwind Energy, Inc.

Contact:
Broadwind Energy, Inc.
John Segvich, 630.995.7137
john.segvich@bwen.com

 

 

THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY!

Can China Really Dump the Dollar?

The U.S. dollar is on our minds these days because it is weak and getting weaker. We hear reports that Chinese officials are actively cautioning, scolding and remonstrating with the U.S. on its profligate ways because China has a few trillion in reserves -- much of it invested in dollar-denominated securities.

The falling dollar and China’s big stake in dollar-denominated securities raises the question, “Will China dump the dollar?” For investors, I believe a better question is: Can China really dump the dollar?

In terms of foreign currencies, I believe there are only two other actual currencies — the euro and the Japanese yen — that China could look to other than the dollar. China’s financial reserves are big enough that its government has to have its foreign assets denominated in a very large, liquid currency. There are not too many of those around other than the U.S. dollar, the euro and the yen.

For a variety of historical and cultural reasons, I doubt if the Chinese would seriously entertain putting most of their foreign currency and foreign assets holdings in the Japanese yen, so the currency choice is between the dollar and the euro.

The Chinese are investing in the euro, but that is happening in an incremental fashion. As long as the U.S. remains a significant trading partner for China’s exports, the dollar will be a major currency for Chinese central bank activities. There are those who think the Chinese will dump the dollar and buy euros on a wholesale basis, but that is unlikely.

However, one other choice is being discussed — the Chinese currency itself, known alternatively as the yuan or renmimbi. (Let’s go with yuan, but really, why can’t they just make up their minds?)

I have no doubt the Chinese would love to have the yuan as the world’s reserve currency, but I don’t see that happening soon -- unless they really want to wreak havoc and let loose the dogs of currency and trade war.

What If?

Just to finish the thought, what if China did dump the dollar in a significant way? First, the implications of that are obviously negative for the U.S. economy, as the dollar would fall even further under the selling pressure. Other countries along with large investors would dump dollars, putting more pressure on it. In order to shore up the dollar, the Federal Reserve would be forced to raise short-term interest rates and, though that would help the dollar, it would hurt the economy in the short run.

However, consider how these events would affect China. Selling its stake in dollar-denominated securities is something that could not be done quickly, so a precipitous fall in the dollar would reduce the value of all dollar-based securities China continued to hold. Also, assuming the U.S. economy softened under this scenario, exports to America would dry up quite a bit.

Finally, there would be intense political pressure in the U.S. to retaliate by slapping tariffs on Chinese goods and taking other punitive measures. In short, China would also suffer a great deal if it tried to dump the dollar, so I do not believe it can dump the dollar -- but I also believe it's actively seeking other options. In the long run though, it still comes down — and down and down — to the dollar.

What’s Next for the Dollar?

The big difficulty we face now is that the economy is weak and the Fed likes to have very low interest rates to help the economy begin to grow again. Low interest rates are helpful to overall economic activity, but low rates generally hurt the dollar.

If the Federal Reserve wanted to help out the weak dollar, the response would ideally be to raise interest rates. However, due to serious weakness in the economy, the Fed is hampered in its ability to respond to this situation; I believe it will opt to keep interest rates low well into 2012 in order to promote economic growth. Unfortunately, of course, that means we are likely to have a weak dollar for some time as well.

You may hear various politicians or pundits decrying the weak dollar. However, for decades our government’s philosophy during recessions has been to publicly espouse a strong dollar while also cutting interest rates to strengthen the economy and give unemployment a boost. This has traditionally been done despite the fact that lower interest rates generally lead to a weaker dollar. I don’t see anything in the cards that appears to have changed that policy. Therefore, I expect continued pressure on the dollar as the Fed seeks to get economic activity going again.

Huge Deficits Mean More Pressure on the Dollar

With huge budget deficits as far as the eye can see, the U.S. Treasury has to issue enormous amounts of Treasury securities. To absorb these securities, the Treasury needs buyers, so we need China to continue investing. As a result, U.S. fiscal and monetary policy will be increasingly tied to keeping China happy. It enforces a discipline of sorts, but our policy options are going to be increasingly limited and necessarily reactive, rather than proactive.

The Road Ahead

The dollar is likely to be weak until the Fed starts raising interest rates, which is unlikely to happen until later next year, so we will continue to hear lots of noise from Washington and parts eastward about the dollar -- but I do not think anyone in the Treasury Department or the Federal Reserve will do anything meaningful about the dollar soon.

As long as this low interest rate trend continues, the dollar will weaken. However, when the dollar snaps back, as it will (if even temporarily), the move will be very quick.

The Commercial Real Estate Time Bomb

I have written before about the prospects of economic time bombs everywhere. While potential problems such as another round of pending residential resets have been well highlighted, the commercial real estate (CRE) time bomb is now as well documented. Recently, Elizabeth Warren stated on CNBC that ½ of all CRE mortgages will be underwater by the end of 2010:

By the end of 2010, about half of all commercial real estate mortgages will be underwater, said Elizabeth Warren, chairperson of the TARP Congressional Oversight Panel, in a wide-ranging interview on Monday.

“They are [mostly] concentrated in the mid-sized banks,” Warren told CNBC. “We now have 2,988 banks—mostly midsized, that have these dangerous concentrations in commercial real estate lending."

As a result, the economy will face another “very serious problem” that will have to be resolved over the next three years, she said, adding that things are unlikely to return to normalcy in 2010.

Serious CRE problems
In February 2010, the Congressional Oversight Panel released a report entitled Commercial Real Estate Losses and the Risk to Financial Stability, which contained a number of disturbing data points. The report documents rising CRE vacancy rates:


…falling property prices:


…and rising CRE delinquency rates:


A fragile banking system
All of these conditions exist in the context of a fragile banking system. The chart below shows the percentage of banks whose loan loss provisions, or Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL), exceed non-performing loans (NPL). If ALLL is greater than NPL, then banks will need to increase their provisions for NPLs.


Can an already fragile banking system withstand another round of loan write-downs?

Add one more thing to the list that keeps me lying awake at night.

Not Even These 2 Hiccups Can Hold Back the iPhone 5

The iPhone 5 has now officially launched. Analyst estimates for launch weekend sales reach as high as 10 million units, including the 2 million preorders that Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) already booked. With the new model starting at $650 retail pricing, we're talking about potentially $6.5 billion in sales this weekend for the iPhone maker.

That being said, the company still saw some hiccups running up to the launch. Do investors have anything to be worried about?

The calendar year is not a baker's dozen, except in France
In France it's common for companies to pay a thirteenth month of salary, almost as if you were heading down to your local bagel shop and ordering up a baker's dozen. Apple does not adopt this practice in the country, and local labor unions that represent roughly 25% of Apple Store employees in the area made a number of demands of Cupertino, including the aforementioned baker's dozen year.

Union leader Thomas Bordage encouraged disgruntled employees that weren't happy with Apple's practices to protest at the popular Opera location in Paris on iPhone 5 launch day in order to have the greatest impact.

Opera Apple Store in Paris. Source: Apple.

Apple has nearly 1,000 employees for its retail stores in the region, and only about handful of protestors actually made it out to the demonstration. According to a Reuters report, most of the protestors were actually former workers of independent distributors that were shuttered amid competition from Apple's own stores. Only three of the demonstrators were Apple employees.

As far as iPhone 5 sales went, they were mostly uninhibited. The protests took place at a distance from the entrance and customers were still able to get in and get their hands on the device, although one buyer said it was "spoiling the party a little."

Apple is no stranger to bad press over labor practices, although the controversy in its Asian supply chain is much more of a concern than a couple hundred disgruntled employees. For context, in the U.S. Apple employs over 27,000�workers at its retail locations, compared to the 1,000 throughout France.

Mission impossible
According to�The Wall Street Journal, the day before the release, Japanese�carrier partners were burglarized and the thieves made off with nearly $100,000 worth of iPhone 5 units. Three retail stores of Apple's carrier partners were robbed, with varying quantities taken.

Local police said that a total of 191 units were stolen between the three robberies, causing some of the locations not to open on Friday as planned. Authorities believe the robberies were unrelated and not part of a grander scheme.

Stolen iPhones certainly can't spell good news for Apple, but ultimately we're talking about less than 200 units on a weekend that will be measured in millions. I don't think investors will be disappointed if Apple reports 0.0002 million units less than they were expecting.

Bigger fish to fry
Instead of these minor hiccups, investors should be more concerned with these two things that actually could hold back broader iPhone 5 supply: Qualcomm's (Nasdaq: QCOM  ) newest baseband chips and the new in-cell displays supplied by Sharp, Japan Display, and LG Display (NYSE: LPL  ) . Ripples throughout Apple's supply chain related to these technologies have much more potential to limit unit sales if crucial ingredients are hard to come by.

The company is already on the receiving end of major user backlash over its decision to ditch Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) Maps in favor of its own in-house offering, going as far as to issue a formal statement reassuring the masses that it will get better over time. Meanwhile, Big G quietly smirks on the sidelines.

The introduction of the iPhone 5 is an event Apple investors have been looking forward to for months. The stakes are high and the opportunity is huge, so to help investors understand this epic Apple event, we've just released an exclusive update dedicated to the iPhone 5 launch. By picking up a copy of our�premium research�report on Apple, you'll learn everything you need to know about the launch, and receive ongoing guidance as key news hits. Claim your copy today by clicking here�now.

Silver Eagles Soar!


In World War I severe material shortages played havoc with production schedules and caused lengthy delays in implementing programs. This led to development of the Harbord List – a list of 42 materials deemed critical to the military.

After World War II the United States created the National Defense Stockpile (NDS) to acquire and store critical strategic materials for national defense purposes. The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials (DLA Strategic Materials) oversees operations of the NDS and their primary mission is to “protect the nation against a dangerous and costly dependence upon foreign sources of supply for critical materials in times of national emergency.” 

The NDS was intended for all essential civilian and military uses in times of emergencies. In 1992, Congress directed that the bulk of these stored commodities be sold. Revenues from the sales went to the Treasury General Fund and a variety of defense programs - the Foreign Military Sales program, military personnel benefits, and the buyback of broadband frequencies for military use 

American Silver Eagle

The American Silver Eagle is the official silver bullion coin of the United States. It was first released by the United States Mint on November 24, 1986 and is struck only in the one troy ounce size.

The Bullion American Silver Eagle sales program ultimately came about because the US government wanted, during the 1970s and early 1980s, to sell off what it considered excess silver from the Defense National Stockpile.

"Several administrations had sought unsuccessfully to sell silver from the stockpile, arguing that domestic production of silver far exceeds strategic needs. But mining-state interests had opposed any sale, as had pro-military legislators who wanted assurances that the proceeds would be used to buy materials more urgently needed for the stockpile rather than merely to reduce the federal deficit." Wall Street Journal

The authorizing legislation for the American Silver Eagle bullion sales program required that the silver used for the coins had to be from the Defense National Stockpile. By 2002 the DNS stockpile was so depleted of silver that if the American Silver Eagle bullion sales program was to continue further legislation was required.

On June 6, 2002, Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada) introduced the Support of American Eagle Silver Bullion Program Act to “authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to purchase silver on the open market when the silver stockpile is depleted."

2002 - 10,539,026 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold.

2003 - 8,495,008 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold, silver averaged $4.88 an ounce for the year. 

2004 - 8,882,754 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold. For 2004 the average cost of an ounce of silver was $6.67.

2005 - 8,891,025 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold. Silver averaged $7.32 an ounce.

2006 - 10,676,522 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold. Silver averaged $11.55 an ounce. 

2007 - 9,028,036 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold. 

2008 - 20,583,000 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold. Silver averaged $14.99 an ounce and almost 80% more Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold then in any previous year. 

The US Mint suspended sales of the silver bullion coins to its network of authorized purchasers twice during the year. 

In March 2008, sales increased nine times over the month before - 200,000 to 1,855,000.

In April 2008, the United States Mint had to start an allocation program, effectively rationing Silver Eagle bullion coins to authorized dealers on a weekly basis due to "unprecedented demand."

On June 6, 2008, the Mint announced that all incoming silver planchets were being used to produce only bullion issues of the Silver Eagle and not proof or uncirculated collectible issues.

The 2008 Proof Silver Eagle became unavailable for purchase from the United States Mint in August 2008.

2009 - 30,459,000 Bullion American Silver Eagles were sold

On March 5, 2009, the United States Mint announced that the proof and uncirculated versions of the Silver Eagle coin for that year were temporarily suspended due to continuing high demand for the bullion version.

On October 6, 2009, the Mint announced that the collectible versions of the Silver Eagle coin would not be produced for 2009.

The sale of 2009 Silver Eagle bullion coins was suspended from November 24 to December 6 and the allocation program was re-instituted on December 7.

Silver Eagle bullion coins sold out on January 12, 2010.

The average cost of an ounce of silver in 2009 was $14.67

2010

No proof Silver Eagles were released through the first ten months of the year, and there was a complete cancellation of the uncirculated Silver Eagles.

Production of the 2010 Silver Eagle bullion coins began in January instead of  December as usual. The coins were distributed to authorized dealers under an allocation program until September 3.

In 2010 the US Mint sold 34,700,000 Bullion American Silver Eagle Coins.

2011

According to the USGS’s most recent Silver Mineral Industry Survey, silver production fell to 37 tonnes in October - compared to 53 tonnes year over year (yoy).

In 2011, the United States produced approximately 1,054 tonnes of silver – down from 2010’s production of 1,154 tonnes and down from 2007’s production of 1,163 tonnes.

The US imported 6,600,000 oz of silver for consumption in 2011 – up from 2007’s imports of 4,830,000 oz.

In 2011 the US Mint sold 39,868,500 Bullion American Silver Eagle Coins.

2011 was the first year in which official coin sales will surpass domestic silver production.

 

Jeff Clark of Casey Research writes “For the first time in history, sales of silver Eagle and Maple Leaf coins surpassed domestic production in both the US and Canada. Throw in the fact that by most estimates less than 5% of the US population owns any gold or silver and you can see how precarious the situation is. A supply squeeze is not out of the question – rather it is coming to look more and more likely with each passing month.”

The US Mint is required by law to mint the bullion Silver Eagles to meet public demand for precious metal coins as an investment option. The numismatic versions of the coin (proof and uncirculated) were added by the Mint solely for collectors.

2012

United States Mint Authorized Purchasers (AP’s) ordered 3,197,000 Bullion American Silver Eagle Coins on January 3rd, the first day they went on sale. That opening day total catapulted January Bullion Eagle sales higher than half of the monthly totals in 2011.

As of January 25th 2012, 5,547,000 Bullion American Silver Eagle Coins had been sold.

Bullion Silver Eagles are guaranteed for weight and purity by the government of the United States and because of this the US government allows bullion Silver Eagles to be added to Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs).

Conclusion

The twin policies of zero interest rates and the continual creation of money and credit being enacted today, by all governments and central banks, means that the purchase of precious metals is the only way to protect the value of your assets.

“Mark my words, if the interest rates on U.S. government debt truly reflected both the real level of inflation in this country and the rising risk of some form of default, rates would already by sky-high and the U.S. would resemble a massive Greece.”  John Embry, Chief Investment Strategist, Sprott Asset Management

Investors are currently risk adverse and mining stocks are not well understood by the general investing public, but at least one thing is going to become very apparent to most -  the best way to hedge yourself against inflation could be owning silver.

Junior resource companies offer the greatest leverage to increasing demand and rising prices for silver. Junior resource companies are soon going to have their turn under the investment spotlight and should be on every investors radar screen. Are they on yours?

If not, maybe they should be.

*Post courtesy of Richard Mills at Aheadoftheherd.com where he covers the junior resource sector. 

 

Is National Grid the Right Stock to Retire With?

Now more than ever, a comfortable retirement depends on secure, stable investments. Unfortunately, the right stocks for retirement won't just fall into your lap. In this series, I look at 10 measures to show what makes a great retirement-oriented stock.

Retirees and dividend-paying utilities go together like a horse and carriage. But not all utilities are the same. Electric provider National Grid (NYSE: NGG  ) gives investors an interesting and unusual combination: exposure to both U.S. and international markets. But is that a winning combination? Below, we'll look at how the company does on our 10-point scale.

The right stocks for retirees
With decades to go before you need to tap your investments, you can take greater risks, weighing the chance of big losses against the potential for mind-blowing returns. But as retirement approaches, you no longer have the luxury of waiting out a downturn.

Sure, you still want good returns, but you also need to manage your risk and protect yourself against bear markets, which can maul your finances at the worst possible time. The right stocks combine both of these elements in a single investment.

When scrutinizing a stock, retirees should look for:

  • Size. Most retirees would rather not take a flyer on unproven businesses. Bigger companies may lack their smaller counterparts' growth potential, but they do offer greater security.
  • Consistency. While many investors look for fast-growing companies, conservative investors want to see steady, consistent gains in revenue, free cash flow, and other key metrics. Slow growth won't make headlines, but it will help prevent the kind of ugly surprises that suddenly torpedo a stock's share price.
  • Stock stability. Conservative retirement investors prefer investments that move less dramatically than typical stocks, and they particularly want to avoid big losses. These investments will give up some gains during bull markets, but they won't fall as far or as fast during bear markets. Beta measures volatility, but we also want a track record of solid performance as well.
  • Valuation. No one can afford to pay too much for a stock, even if its prospects are good. Using normalized earnings multiples helps smooth out one-time effects, giving you a longer-term context.
  • Dividends. Most of all, retirees look for stocks that can provide income through dividends. Retirees want healthy payouts now and consistent dividend growth over time -- as long as it doesn't jeopardize the company's financial health.

With those factors in mind, let's take a closer look at National Grid.

Factor

What We Want to See

Actual

Pass or Fail?

Size Market cap > $10 billion $33.6 billion Pass
Consistency Revenue growth > 0% in at least four of five past years 3 years Fail
Free cash flow growth > 0% in at least four of past five years 2 years Fail
Stock stability Beta < 0.9 0.27 Pass
Worst loss in past five years no greater than 20% (36.8%) Fail
Valuation Normalized P/E < 18 11.33 Pass
Dividends Current yield > 2% 6% Pass
5-year dividend growth > 10% 6.9% Fail
Streak of dividend increases >= 10 years 2 years Fail
Payout ratio < 75% 42.3% Pass
Total score 5 out of 10

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Total score = number of passes.

National Grid only scores five points, which isn't enough to give conservative investors everything they'd want from a stock. The dividend is valuable and looks solid, but inconsistent growth and the inherent uneven nature of international-stock dividends makes the payouts less predictable than with pure U.S. companies.

National Grid is a U.K.-based company that has a very strong competitive position across the Atlantic. In the U.S., the company operates in the Northeast and New England. But with electrical infrastructure in the U.K. in poor shape, National Grid did a secondary offering of shares back in 2010 that earned investors' ire for being dilutive.

Yet National Grid gets a huge portion of its income from the U.K., where service rates automatically adjust for inflation, so the move should pay off in the long run. Moreover, with expertise in rebuilding infrastructure, National Grid will have a competitive advantage when it comes time to make upgrades to its U.S. lines.

The big question, though, is how National Grid will respond to increasing consolidation in the industry. With huge mergers on the table, including Duke Energy's (NYSE: DUK  ) prospective buyout of Progress Energy (NYSE: PGN  ) and Exelon (NYSE: EXC  ) matching up with Constellation Energy (NYSE: CEG  ) , National Grid could find itself without a much-needed partner if it wants to expand beyond the northeastern corner of the U.S.

Retirees and other conservative investors like the 6% yield, though, which exceeds those of peers Southern (NYSE: SO  ) and American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP  ) . If the economy continues to strengthen, then increased demand for electricity should keep those dividend checks coming -- and growing -- for the foreseeable future.

Keep searching
Finding exactly the right stock to retire with is a tough task, but it's not impossible. Searching for the best candidates will help improve your investing skills, and teach you how to separate the right stocks from the risky ones.

Add National Grid to My Watchlist, which will aggregate our Foolish analysis on it and all your other stocks.

If you want to retire rich, you need to be confident that you've got the basics of your investment strategy down pat. See if you're on track by following the "13 Steps to Investing Foolishly."

The Electric Car IPO That Ran out of Juice

Shares of electric truck maker Smith Electric Vehicles was supposed to begin its publicly traded life today, but the IPO has run out of gas.

The company suspended its debut, withdrawing its registration statement last night after failing to get enough buyers at its desired pricing.

"We received significant interest from potential investors, however, we were unable to complete a transaction at a valuation or size that would be in the best interests of our company and its existing shareholders," CEO Bryan Hansel said in the company's statement. "We have instead elected to pursue private financing opportunities to support the execution of our business plan."

Ouch!

To be fair, the maker of all-electric commercial vehicles wasn't exactly diving into a red-hot market. Outside of Tesla Motors (Nasdaq: TSLA  ) -- drawing a long waiting list for its Model S sedan, in part because of light production -- there haven't been too many success stories in this once-promising niche.

  • General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) had to temporarily halt production of the Chevy Volt this month -- again -- despite an uptick in sales fueled by Californians allowing solo drivers of electric cars to use the carpool lane.
  • Ford (NYSE: F  ) jumped into the fray earlier this year with an electric model of its popular Ford Focus. The automaker had only sold 177 units through August.
  • Nissan (NASDAQOTH: NSANY.PK) continues to see Leaf sales sputter. Just 685 of the petite all-electric cars sold last month, half as many as Nissan sold in August of last year. Sales so far this year are off by nearly 32%.

None of these passenger car developments technically matter for Smith Electric. It sells trucks to fleet operators with predictable routes that can return the vehicles to docks after 120 miles of electric power. A closer match would be Westport Innovations (Nasdaq: WPRT  ) , the fast-growing company that makes fuel systems for vehicles to run on cheaper and cleaner liquefied natural gas.

Commercial fleet operators are more rational and less emotional in their purchasing decisions. If gas prices are heading up -- as they have this summer -- going electric makes even more sense.

However, investors tend to lump electric vehicle makers in the same pot, and they're just not buying it.

Smith Electric was only looking to sell less than 4.5 million shares at a price in the high teens, but apparently the demand at those valuations just wasn't there.

It doesn't help that Smith Electric was losing money on widening deficits. Revenue was also down this year after a 40% pop last year. Was it apathy for the electric vehicle niche or the company's own fundamentals that put the IPO up on blocks?

It was probably a little bit of both, but this story doesn't end here. Smith Electric will live to charge another day.

Hit the road
There's obviously more to Ford than its fledgling Ford Focus Electric. Ford has been performing incredibly well as a company over the past few years -- it's making good vehicles, is consistently profitable, recently reinstated its�dividend, and has done a remarkable job paying down its�debt. But Ford's�stock�seems stuck in neutral. Does this create an incredible buying opportunity, or are there hidden risks with the stock that investors need to know about? To answer that, one of our top equity analysts has compiled a premium research report with in-depth analysis on�whether Ford is a buy�right now, and why. Simply�click here�to get�instant access�to this premium report.

Market Preview: Stacking the Odds

It's January in an election year and that's typically a very good time to invest in stocks.

The wonders of the January effect get discussed extensively this time of year, and rightly so given the track record. Since 1945, a positive performance for the S&P 500 in January has translated to a full-year gain a whopping 86% of the time, according to S&P Capital IQ, with the average advance coming in at a more than respectable 15.7%.

See if (F) is in our portfolio

The predictive powers of a positive first month are even stronger when the United States heads to the polls to determine who gets to spend the next four years in the Oval Office. "During presidential election years, the January Barometer has been even more helpful in identifying up years, as the S&P 500 rose in price during the entire year eight of eight times following positive performances in January, gaining an average 16%," wrote Sam Stovall, chief equity strategist at S&P Capital IQ, in commentary on Tuesday. "Yet whenever the S&P 500 fell in January of this fourth year, the market fell an average 4.5% and declined in price 50% of the time."Overall, the S&P 500 has risen in 75% of all presidential election years since 1945, so history indicates the coming showdown in November stacks the odds a bit in favor of a positive year. The next question, of course, is how positive? And after essentially coming in flat for 2011, Wall Street is expecting a decent bounce this year, for what that's worth though, as market strategists are notoriously bullish about the broad market. According to Birinyi Associates, the 2012 S&P 500 forecasts of 13 of the major firms, including Bank of America, Citigroup, and Goldman Sachs, average out to 1335, which would be a 6% gain from 2011's close at 1258. The biggest bull on the list is Deutsche Bank at 1500, while only HSBC and Goldman see declines down to 1190 and 1250, respectively. For its part, UBS, whose target is at 1325, stressed timing in its U.S. equity strategy commentary on Tuesday, recommending investors take a bit of a wait-and-see approach to the customary boost that January brings.

1 2 3 Next › Last »

"While we project the market to rise in 2012, we would not be buyers at current levels and anticipate more attractive entry points in the future," the firm said prior to Tuesday's surge. "2012 should again be a struggle between stronger domestic fundamentals and macro risks. Despite continued action on the part of policy makers, we believe that equities will struggle in the face of a recession in Europe."

As for Wednesday, the earnings news is sparse, led by potash provider Mosaic(MOS), which is due to deliver its fiscal second-quarter results after the closing bell. The average estimate of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters is for earnings of $1.30 a share in the November-ended quarter on revenue of $3.2 billion.

Mosaic shares endured a tough 2011, falling more than 30%. The company missed the consensus profit view last quarter, breaking a streak of three straight upside surprises of 10% or more, and the stock has also been hit by the impact of secondary offerings related to its split-off from privately held Cargill in late May and its inclusion in the S&P 500 in late September. Last week, Mosaic announced plans to cut back on its finished phosphate production by up to 250,000 tons through the end of March, saying that spot prices "have become disconnected with the underlying agricultural fundamentals." At the time, the company also said volumes and pricing for both phosphate and potash are still within prior forecasts. On Sept. 28, when it reported its first-quarter results, Mosaic forecast total sales volumes of 1.7 to 2.1 million tons for potash with prices projected between $440 and $465 per ton; as well as total sales volumes of 3.1 to 3.5 million tons for phosphates with prices projected between $600 and $625 per ton. Wall Street is generally bullish ahead of the report with 13 of the 22 analysts covering the stock at either strong buy (2) or buy (11), and the median 12-month price target at $65, implying potential upside of more than 20% from Tuesday's close at $52.59. Since hitting a 52-week low of $44.86 on Oct. 4, the stock has risen nearly 18%, although it's still well off a peak of $89.24 reached last February.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

Other companies slated to open the books tomorrow include Resources Connection(RECN), Sonic Corp.(SONC), Texas Industries(TXI) and Unifirst(UNF).

Wednesday's economic calendar is light with the Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly index of application activity at 7 a.m. ET, the weekly Redbook chain-store sales at 9 a.m. ET, and factory orders for November at 10 a.m. ET.

The market is expecting a pretty big improvement in the orders data with the consensus projected a 2.1% year-over-year rise vs. a 0.4% decline in October Briefing.com itself is even more optimistic, forecasting a 2.6% jump. Another factor in Wednesday's action could be auto and truck sales for December, which will hit the wires from Ford(F), General Motors(GM), and others throughout the day. Ford shares lost more than 35% in 2011, but they've bounced a bit since hitting a 52-week low of $9.05 in early October, closing Tuesday at $11.13. GM is in a similar boat, forfeiting nearly half of its value since hitting a high of $39.48 last January. The shares closed Tuesday at $21.05, bouncing 11% since hitting a low of $19 on Dec. 19. Both stocks have forward price-to-earnings multiples that trade at discounts to the broad market -- 7X and 5.5X respectively vs. less than 13X for the S&P 500 -- but Ford has a bit more zip right now, having recently reinstated its dividend. Sterne Agee designated Ford its top pick in the auto sector on Dec. 21 with a buy rating and $18 price target, saying the company is positioned "to be a prime beneficiary of improving vehicle demand on a global basis." GM's got its share of bulls as well though with 17 of the 20 analysts covering the stock at either strong buy (6) or buy (11), but the 12-month median price target of $32 points to further downside ahead. Last month, Ford reported total retail sales rose 13% year-over-year to 166,865 vehicles in November, while GM delivered a 7% increase to 180,402 vehicles.And finally, Acme Packet(APKT) was a big loser in after-hours action on Tuesday after lowering its financial outlook. What was interesting about the warning was that the company, which makes hardware and software to manage data networks, pointed to weakness in North American service provider market, saying that its Europe and Latin America businesses held up well. One red flag for stocks has been the number of negative warnings ahead of fourth-quarter reporting season. According to Thomson Reuters data, 143 of the S&P 500 companies have pre-announced for the quarter, and 94 of those pre-announcements have been negative vs. 40 positive ones and 9 in-line. The current estimated earnings growth rate is 8.3% for the quarter, down from an expectation of 15% in early October and the 18% growth seen in the third quarter. TiVo(TIVO) will also be in focus after successfully settling a patent dispute with AT&T(T), securing more than $250 million in payments. -->To submit a news tip, send an email to: tips@thestreet.com

>To order reprints of this article, click here: Reprints « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3

Friday, September 28, 2012

Groupon Goes Corporate, Zynga Stays Zany

Despite all the visionary talk from young dot-com CEOs, the golden rule still applies on Wall Street: That is, the person who has the gold makes the rules. This certainly has been illustrated by the Groupon offering.

Until a few weeks ago, Groupon�s CEO Andrew Mason was a wacky character. He liked to make funny facial gestures and crack jokes while giving interviews. He turned down a $6 billion offer from Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) last year. Even in the original filing for Groupon�s IPO, Mason included a funky letter to prospective shareholders. In it, he talked about empowering the �little guy� and how his company was �unusual.� The most interesting line: �Life is too short to be a boring company.�

My, how things have bored down for Groupon.

For example, the once-unhinged Mason now is wearing a suit and tie while putting together a fairly corporate-friendly presentation on his IPO road show.

And now Mason is saying the kinds of things that jazz up investors, like Groupon’s apparent new policy to fire the 10% worst-performing salespeople — each year. This could come to nearly 500 pink slips annually and certainly would motivate the remaining 90%.

The idea isn’t exactly new — this was something General Electric�s (NYSE:GE) former CEO, Jack Welch, implemented to save the company from implosion during the 1980s. Of course, Enron also used the 10% game plan.

But on the other side of the dot-com bubble is Zynga, which also is expected to go public in November. This company’s brash approach has not been diminished.

A sure sign is Zynga�s new headquarters, which looks like a high-tech amusement park. At the entrance, you�ll see a Winnebago. And as you wander about, you�ll find numerous massage chairs and other way-cool expensive furniture, as well as cafes well-stocked with sushi. (Let the Occupy Wall Street folks eat cake!)

A few weeks ago, Zynga�s CEO Mark Pincus launched 10 new games at the offices, which were packed with reporters — the scene was more reminiscent of a Hollywood film, not a business product launch.

True, this stuff is really over the top. But then again, Zynga is being authentic to its culture. The company understands this is important, especially when trailblazing a new market.

As for Groupon — it seems it will do whatever it needs to kowtow to Wall Street�s whims.

Tom Taulli runs the InvestorPlace blog �IPO Playbook,� a site dedicated to the hottest news and rumors about initial public offerings. He is also the author of �All About Short Selling� and �All About Commodities.� Follow him on Twitter at @ttaulli. As of this writing, he did not own a position in any of the aforementioned stocks.

Sprint Confirms Radio Shack Phasing Out Palm Pre, Pixi Sales (Updated)

Radio Shack (RSH) is phasing out sales of� both the Palm (PALM) Pixi and Pre in favor of two newer devices, a spokesman for Sprint (S) confirms. Update: At least one of the replacement devices will be a Research In Motion (RIMM) BlackBerry.

“This is in line with Radio Shack’s normal product planning process – there is a designated amount of space in stores for handsets and they work to keep the line up of devices as current as possible,” Sprint spokesman Scott Sloat said via -email.

Obvious question is WHICH two newer devices will take the place of the Pre and the Pixi; will update if/when I get the answer.

PALM today is down 81 cents, or 14.5%, to $4.78.

Earlier: Palm: Doubts Arise On Finding Buyer; Radio Shack Phase Out? (Updated)

Update: Sloat reports that “The plan is for the Pre to be replaced by a BlackBerry device and the Pixi for a message-centric device. At this point, that is as detailed as I can be.”

Iceland’s debt comes in from the cold

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) � Iceland. The mere mention of this rocky island outpost used to send chills down the spine of over-leveraged nations worldwide.

No more. What was once the poster child for economic excess has emerged a role model for countries struggling to save their bacon in the global bond market.

Fitch Ratings on Friday raised its credit rating on Iceland to BBB- from BB+. The move marks the passage of Iceland�s debt from junk back to investment grade. At the same time, Fitch declared Iceland�s economic outlook stable, something that might have seemed unattainable three years ago.

Iceland was the proverbial canary in the mine shaft, a tiny nation (population 313,000) of fishermen and sheepherders that had this crazy notion it could transform itself into a major hub of international finance.

Reuters Smoke rises from the Grimsvotn volcano, under the Vatnajokull glacier in southeast Iceland May 21, 2011. After Iceland's most active volcano erupted, a thick cloud of ash blocked out the daylight at towns and villages at the foot of the glacier where the volcano lies and covered cars and buildings.

It worked, for a while, thanks to easy credit, lax oversight of its banks, clueless credit ratings and a collective abandonment of fundamental economic realities. Sound familiar?

As the money flowed, Icelanders came to believe that maybe, just maybe, they could afford to live like London bankers. Soon they were convinced they could. And while the nation�s sparse gravel roads gave way to paved freeways ferrying a bunch of brand-new Land Rovers, old-timers wondered whether their young financial gurus were leading the nation into the dream realm of the Mountain King.

Then they got their clocks cleaned.

When global credit markets unraveled in 2008, Iceland�s three biggest commercial banks collapsed. Iceland�s debt rating plummeted to junk status. The value of its currency, the krona , fell sharply and a severe economic recession set in.

But it�s a testament to the Icelanders that they quickly recognized they�d built a house of cards and took drastic action to recover that involved, among other things, nationalizing one bank and handing control of all three major banks to the equivalent of a board of creditors.

The tough lessons of the past decade�s excesses galvanized Icelanders. They got to work slashing public spending to bring it closer in line with their GDP, salvaged their tattered currency and, last summer, successfully exited a rescue program set up by the International Monetary Fund. Consequently, Iceland once again has access to international credit markets.

Land Rover sales are no doubt down and Reykjavik�s red-hot night life has probably cooled a bit. But there were never riots in the streets and they never blamed their neighbors for their predicament.

The fact that Icelanders don�t have neighbors might actually be key to their turnaround effort. After spending most of the past 1,000 years isolated from the rest of the world, the need for self-reliance and understanding that actions have consequences are nothing new to them.

That�s probably a timely, and inspiring, lesson for the rest of us.

� Jim Jelter

Top Stocks For 2012-1-18-20

 

Solutions Include Speech Recognition Technology, Analytics, Reporting Services for HIM and Radiology

FRANKLIN, Tenn., Sept. 20, 2011 (CRWENEWSWIRE) — MedQuist Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq:MEDH), a leading provider of integrated clinical documentation solutions for the U.S. healthcare system, announced that Los Angeles County Department of Health Services has chosen the company to provide clinical speech technology and documentation services across its health system and SpeechQ front-end speech recognition technology for its radiology practices.

By standardizing on MedQuist services and technology to capture the detailed story for its patient population, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services will have actionable, meaningful clinical documentation, experience cost reductions and realize clinical documentation improvement, which will help them with their move from ICD-9 to ICD-10. Front-end speech recognition capabilities for radiology will provide technology enhancements with accuracy gains in speech understanding, in addition to cost savings afforded by a standardized solution for radiology transcription technology and services.

“The MedQuist solution greatly enhances the efficiency of our clinical operations by harnessing the latest in technology,” said LAC+USC Medical Center Diagnostic Services Administrator Daniel Amaya. “We look forward to our continued partnership and to meeting our performance and cost objectives.”

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services facilities included in this relationship are:

Harbor UCLA Medical Center
High Desert Health System
LAC+USC Health Care Network
Martin Luther King, Jr. Multi-Service Ambulatory Care Center
Olive View-UCLA Medical Center
Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center

Clinical documentation services are performed utilizing the company’s DocQment Enterprise Platform (EP) through digital voice capture, automated speech recognition and transcription and editing tools. DocQment EP(TM) facilitates workflow efficiencies and high-quality clinical information captured from the physician narrative. DocQlytics, an intuitive reporting dashboard streamlines and accelerates performance reporting on clinical documentation and provides continuous process improvement analytics. SpeechQ for Radiology offers real-time interactive speech for dictation, review and electronic signature of reports, interfaces with radiology information systems (RIS) or picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) systems.

“The Los Angeles County Department of Health Services provides valuable healthcare services to the communities in which it operates, and our partnership will help them achieve even greater success for their patients,” said Vern Davenport, Chairman and CEO of MedQuist Holdings. “Deep value will be derived from the rich content delivered through the clinical documentation process we deliver. By capturing such detailed clinical information in the care cycle, greater collaboration in the healthcare continuum will be achieved among stakeholders and deeper insight into each patient’s complete story will enhance delivery of care.”

About Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

The Department of Health Services (DHS) provides acute and rehabilitative patient care, trains physicians and other health care clinicians, and conducts patient care-related research. DHS operates four hospitals, including some of the nation’s premiere academic medical centers through its affiliations with the University of Southern California and the University of California, Los Angeles. In addition, DHS operates two multiservice ambulatory care centers, six comprehensive health centers, and multiple primary care health centers throughout Los Angeles County, many in partnership with private, community-based providers.

About MedQuist

MedQuist is a leading provider of clinical narrative capture services, delivering Speech Understanding technology from MModal and clinical documentation workflow. MedQuist’s enterprise solutions — including mobile voice capture devices, speech recognition, Web-based workflow platforms and global network of medical editors — help healthcare facilities facilitate adoption of electronic health records (EHR), improve patient care, increase physician satisfaction and lower operational costs. For more information, please visit www.medquist.com.

The MedQuist Holdings Inc. logo is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/prs/?pkgid=10083

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this press release regarding MedQuist’s business that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in forward-looking statements. As a result, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Source: MedQuist Holdings Inc.

Contact:

Thomas Mitchell
Director of Marketing
615-798-6630
tmitchell@medquist.com

 

 

THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY!

Wall Street Financial Group’s Joe Richard: It’s a Flexible, Selective Recruiting Environment

“The difference is we’re smaller,” says Joe Richard when asked what, specifically, Wall Street Financial Group does better than anyone else. Their size, he asserts, allows for a flexibility and selectiveness that’s difficult to find at a larger firm. And of course it’s about the culture; a family atmosphere where he knows each rep and knows them well. This means they don’t look to traditional recruiting sources, and that suits them just fine.

Richard, a veteran of the wholesaling side of the business, has been with the firm for nine years. He sat down with Investment Advisor for a candid chat about life at a small, successful firm.

Q:  Broker-dealer recruiting expert Jon Henschen said 2010 was “the year of staying put” for reps. Do you agree with that assessment? If so, are you starting to see things pick up again from a recruiting standpoint?

A:  If we had this conversation in June 2010, I would have agreed with him wholeheartedly. But in the second half of the year we saw things pick up. From an activity standpoint we really started seeing things happen in September.

Q:  What do you attribute it to?

A:  It’s a combination of things. If independents decided they wanted to make a move in 2007, 2008 or 2009, it wasn’t a time you wanted to change broker-dealers. The country was in a recession and the last thing you wanted to do is go back to your clients and tell them you made a change. At that point they’d start looking at statements and seeing that they were down 30% or 40% because of market conditions. So people were biding their time and it wasn’t a good opportunity to move. The other reason is that advisors were waiting to see what the landscape looked like after conditions started to turn around.

Q:  What about revenue from existing reps? Are you seeing revenue per rep increase, decrease or level off?

A:  We’ve always seen revenues increase organically, but to your point, certainly from an average production per rep standpoint I would say since about September 2009 things started picking up again for us. We’ve been in a growth mode for almost a year and a half.

Q:  What does Wall Street Financial do better than anybody else?

A:  The difference is we’re smaller. We have a little less than 200 advisors throughout the country. And we take advantage of that.

Q:  Do you plan to stay that size?

A:  I’ll tell you we never want to get so big that I don’t know what that number is. I think we’d be comfortable at 250. I think we’d be comfortable to 300. I don’t know; I don’t know how much bigger than that we would be based on the fact that it would differentiate someone’s broker-dealer experience when they’re with us. It’s the relationship. We take the time to get to know them and how they’re looking to grow their business. Coming back to recruiting, we don’t need to recruit 60 or 70 new people a year because we’re not losing anyone, at least not anyone that we don’t want to lose. I’ve been here almost nine years and in the time we’ve lost less than five people that we didn’t want to lose. Because that attrition rate is so low we can be very selective in our recruiting.  

Q:  Do you go after wirehouse reps?

A:  It’s not where we are focusing. Even though everybody was talking about breakaway brokers, and that was certainly the hot trend, that wasn’t the best way for us to spend our time. There were firms out there that can matriculate a wirehouse broker into an independent advisor using incubators and all that. One of the biggest factors in whether someone’s going be successful in making the jump is culture. Payout is payout, and everybody knows they’re going to make more money than they were at the wirehouse. The key is integrating into the culture.  

Q:  What about the other independent broker-dealers that got themselves into trouble? Did you pick up anybody from there?

A:  Yeah, we have. But what I said about being selective, you don’t want someone who, for example, sold med cap. The fact is E&O carriers have said they’re not going cover it. E&O complaints are being made on a per claim basis on your policy, if you don’t have coverage, even though they didn’t sell them while they were with you, you’re on the hook and they’re on the hook with you.

Q:  What are your views on the fiduciary front with the whole industry SRO issue?

A:  I think it was good [FINRA CEO] Richard Ketchum attended this year’s FSI OneVoice Conference. The fact that they were able to get him there and he was engaging I think is good. There’s just so much work to be done. It’s difficult when regulation is made because the most frustrating thing is obviously the unintended consequences. I think the more dialogue we have, the better off we’re all going be. It’s simply an uphill battle when dealing with regulators.

Acknowledging Your Employees’ Achievements With Trophies And Plaques

Every organization acknowledges the importance of a corporate gift. Employees get a sense of personal worth and belongingness towards their company as they feel their efforts have been acknowledged by the management when they are presented with trophies and plaques. This helps an organization retain its best achievers. Other employees feel the need to display remarkable performance to be at par with the best performing employees, when they see the appreciation that it can bring. Given its critical significance, a corporate gift should be chosen after much deliberation.

A corporate gift must be a lasting proof of merit so that the recipient can fondly cherish it for time to come after it is presented. When it comes to serving the function of reminding people of their past achievements, no other gift items can be better than trophies and plaques. Trophies and plaques occupy a place in the receiver’s showcase and form a positive image on guests and other visitors.

The versatility of plaques has kept them sought after for ages as ideal gift articles. Various materials such as wood, plastic, metal etc. can be processed to make plaques. Wooden plaques, however, are the most classy of all and are generally preferred. Various kinds of wood, each having its unique essence, are used to create wooden plaques, but wood from oak or cedar trees are the popular choices.

During corporate events, trophies and plaques engraved with your company logo are the best means to recognize employees. They are very impressive corporate gifts. You can personalize trophies and plaques especially for your company.

A good looking trophy with the receiver’s name stamped on it can also serve as a wonderful corporate gift. Several types of trophies, in terms of design and the metal used, can be bought from the market. The size of a trophy is contingent upon how much you are willing to spend on it, but for most purposes, medium sized trophies are the best bet.

Among the various kinds of corporate gifts available, trophies and plaques are one of the best when it comes to making the employee remember his achievement and the company’s appreciation forever, and that is precisely the reason why they are such a safe option for the purpose.

Learn more about a unique corporate gifts Singapore and an affordable award memorabilia such as trophies. Free reprint avaialable from: Acknowledging Your Employees’ Achievements With Trophies And Plaques.

Incoming search terms for the article:
  • trophies to acknowledge employees

Buffett Bought These Stocks — Should You?

The wisdom of Warren Buffett as represented in his stock picking is music to any investor�s ears. His approach is so disciplined and so successful that it stands to reason that if all everyone did was purchase the same stocks he does, and held just as long, we�d all be rich.

Of course, that�s not exactly true, as Buffett�s holdings — through his firm, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.B) — are not made public until many months after his purchase. However, that doesn�t mean there isn�t value in the stocks he selects. After all, he says his ideal holding period is forever. So if it means getting in a bit later than he does, and holding as long as he does, it shouldn�t matter that much in the long run.

But suppose you are just starting out in the market and want to fill your portfolio with some of his selections. Does it make sense even at this late date? It might. It depends on your own risk profile and investment horizon. Here are three Buffett stocks worth examining.

DirecTV (NASDAQ:DTV) has been a personal favorite of mine for some time. While other cable and satellite firms have struggled, DirecTV has consistently increased market share and added subscribers while increasing the average revenue it collects from each subscriber — and it has seen explosive growth in Latin America. DTV uses its capital incredibly efficiently (return on invested capital is 23%), has been buying back stock hand over fist and is a marketing juggernaut.

I got a little worried when second-quarter subscriber numbers disappointed, but the company has bounced back with stellar Q3 earnings. The company added 1.28 million new subscribers in the U.S. alone, and Latin America growth continued unabated. My only question is what the company�s long-term vision might be. There�s still plenty of territory to grab, but at some point one wonders what keeps subscribers from cutting the cord when and if delivery systems become commoditized or Internet delivery supercedes satellite. For now, I think Buffett is right on target, but I have that lingering question in my mind.

I love dollar stores. I compare them often. All this time, I�ve always sided with Dollar Tree (NASDAQ:DLTR) over its competitors. My resolve was shaken when hedge fund guru Bill Ackman took a big position in Family Dollar Stores (NYSE:FDO) and when Warren Buffett opened a position in Dollar General (NYSE:DG).

What are these guys seeing that I don�t? I don�t know what Buffett is thinking. Dollar General sits on $2.77 billion in debt (which is vastly more than its competitors), has net margins well below Dollar Tree�s and still trades at roughly the same valuation as its competitors. I don�t get this one at all, and I say “stay away.”

There is, however, little to argue with regarding Warren Buffett�s holdings in Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO). This is one of those cases where he�s had this stock a very long time and has seen mega-returns. That doesn�t mean KO’s run is over, though. It does, however, look mighty pricey at $66 — not much below where it was when I examined it as part of the �Should You Buy the Dow” series. Don�t jump in right now. Wait for a pullback to at least the mid-50s — uh, stock price, that is, not the 1950s, when Buffett probably bought in.

As of this writing, Lawrence Meyers did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned stocks.

This High-Yield Portfolio Will Beat the Market

Forty weeks ago, I invested my cold, hard cash into 10 high-yield dividend stocks that I believe will beat the market. Let's see the results so far.

Company

Average Cost

Shares

Recent Price

Total Value

Return

Altria (NYSE: MO  ) $24.86 40 $27.34 $1,093.60 9.98%
Philip Morris (NYSE: PM  ) $61.83 17 $72.04 $1,224.68 15.62%
National Grid (NYSE: NGG  ) $45.63 22 $49.09 $1,079.98 7.58%
Annaly Capital Management (NYSE: NLY  ) $17.55 57 $15.76 $898.32 (10.20%)
Frontier Communications (NYSE: FTR  ) $8.71 149 $5.38 $801.78 (38.22%)
Southern $37.87 26 $42.33 $1,100.50 11.77%
France Telecom (NYSE: FTE  ) $22.23 45 $15.57 $700.65 (29.96%)
Vodafone Group (NYSE: VOD  ) $28.69 38 $26.06 $990.28 (9.17%)
Eli Lilly $34.48 29 $35.63 $1,033.27 3.34%
Bristol-Myers Squibb $25.37 39 $30.25 $1,179.75 19.24%
Cash $20.01 $20.01 0%
Dividends Receivable 26.5 26.5 0%
Total Portfolio $10,149.33 1.49%
Investment In SPY (9.48%)
Return vs SPY +10.97%

Source: S&P Capital IQ, as of Nov. 25.

Since my last report, the SPDR S&P 500 fell 7.1%, while our portfolio outperformance moved from beating the market by 8.85 percentage points to a 10.97-point advantage. But outperformance should be taken with a grain of salt. We're investing for the long term, and it's been only nine months.

Movers and shakers
Of our stocks, the biggest mover s in the portfolio were our European telecoms. Vodafone fell 11% and France Telecom fell 9.3%.

Money!
There are five upcoming dividends for the portfolio:

  • Eli Lilly will pay a dividend of $0.49 per share on Dec. 9. The ex-dividend date was Nov. 10.
  • Southern will pay a dividend of $0.4725 per share on Dec. 6. The ex-dividend date was Nov. 3.
  • Frontier will pay a dividend of $0.1875 per share on Dec. 30. The ex-dividend date is Dec 7.
  • National Grid will pay a dividend of $1.09 per share on Jan. 18. The ex-dividend date is Nov. 30.
  • Vodafone will pay a dividend of 0.705 pence per share (roughly $1.12) on Feb. 3. The ex-dividend date was Nov. 16.

My Foolish bottom line
I'm highly confident in this portfolio's ability to crush the market over the next decade, and that's why I put $10,000 of my personal cash into these stocks. My strategy is simple. I'm buying strong companies with outsized dividends, reinvesting those dividends, and holding them for the long run. Over the coming year, I'll track my performance, update you on when I'm going to reinvest all my dividends, and keep you abreast of news affecting these companies.

Consider these 10 tickers along with the 11 names from a brand new free report from The Motley Fool's expert analysts called "11 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks." Get instant access to the names of these 11 dividend stocks -- it's free.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Debt And Credit Letters

You are going to write a letter asking them to validate that the debt in question is yours. Tell them that they are incorrectly reporting negative information to the credit bureau that isn’t yours and demand that they provide proof that the account is yours via signed contract with your signature on it. The reason you need to deal with them by mail is because most of them have your information stored on a computer so in most cases they won’t be able to provide you a copy of the original contract. Having your information on a computer is called evidence of debt, not proof of debt. . The first legal step in dealing with the collection agencies should be the ‘Debt Validation’ method. Debt validation is a federal right granted under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The procedure begins with ‘initial communication’ from the creditor in the form of phone calls, written letters or, even summons to appear in the court. Then within a period of five days they must notify in writing, the debt validation rights of the concerned person. . A collector might file a lawsuit after the time for filing a lawsuit has passed but if you know your statute of limitation, you should be able to dismiss such suit. If such collection is beyond the time limit for a lawsuit, you might choose to contact the collection to negotiate your debt or ignore the debt. If you choose to negotiate your debt, you should know that as long as your collector knows that you are aware of the SOL, he is willing to settle on what amount you are offering. If you choose to ignore the debt, after the period of reporting limit, the debt would have no effect on your credit report. . A verified name and address will not provide the evidence that you owe money from someone after all. There is no account validation process required in a debt verification letter. The prevalent harassment in the debt collection industry would still be possible. Given that, this verification letter is not an element in learning how to dispute a debt. .

These letters of credit should always be sent by certified mail for future record. Letters of credit are of different types depending upon the use you need to put it in. The most important among them are the intend to sue letter, debt validation letter, letters to remove unauthorized hard inquiry from your report, pay for deletion letters, letter for account re-aging request, cease and desist letter and dispute letters to the credit bureaus to name a few. A letter of credit is in some way or the other related to removing the incorrect negative listings from your credit report thereby improving your credit score. . Hoping you just don’t answer your summons and win that Default and come after you. They will send Interrogatories around to the banks in your area until that one bank send it back saying YES John Doe does have an account here. Or a Garnishment Hearing appears in your Mailbox which you DO HAVE to show up for. So, now these guys got your bank account frozen for the 5k you owe them plus they’ll take a chunk of your weekly pay check. . The Outcome of Validation – Per the FDCPA, if the collector has not reported your debt to the credit bureaus they are not allowed to do so until they provide validation. And if have already reported and are unable to validate the debt they must cease collection efforts and stop reporting. Following Through – Debt validation is a powerful credit repair tool which, in most cases will produce excellent results. But you should also be aware that legal precedent defining the obligations of the collector is inconsistent. . did you ever receive anything in the mail from the Junk Debt Buyer showing you that they legally now own this default account That is called the Assignment. Well, these guys will claim that they sent you a copy of that Assignment when they bought the account off of whatever bank. You need to think, is this it Just a few paragraphs and you want me to pay you 5000. 00 because you say so – Where is the proof of Assignment Meaning show me that you have the right to collect this debt. .

One should be cautious about the fact that it is not applicable to all types of debt. Collection agencies that use illegal methods to extricate the entire amount owed by the defaulter, should be wary about the fact that the victim may have a fair idea about So – L, and any unlawful attempt made by the agency may back fire. Filing for bankruptcy is never a good idea to deal with creditors of unsecured debts. There are a few effective legal alternatives to eliminate your debt or, even reduce it to a considerable extent. . From Discomfort to Opportunity – There is nothing pleasant about receiving a collection letter. But there is a powerful credit repair technique, known as debt validation, which can turn your discomfort into opportunity. Like most credit repair techniques debt validation should be done carefully and only in circumstances conducive to success. Your Rights – Debt validation is the right to challenge a debt and receive written verification of a debt from a debt collector. . In reality, a cease and desist letter should probably only be used once a debt has been validated. Often, third party collectors will ignore the law and continue to contact you andor report a debt even after they fail to validate it or receive a cease and desist letter. That means they can be vulnerable for thousands of dollars and there are a number of lawyers willing to take them on. Believe it or not, the law is on your side once you understand how to utilize it to your benefit. . When asking for validation, request the name and address of the original creditor, the amount owed, how they came up with that figure, and most importantly proof that they now own the debt. A collector can not pursue collection efforts when you have requested validation until they have complied with your request. If they can’t or won’t comply they must cease all collection efforts and can’t report you to the credit bureaus. The credit industry is largely a fraud based on the willingness of the average person to believe propaganda. .

So, if you’ve received collection letters, take a deep breath, and let’s look at some of your options. Read the Letter Carefully – The first think you’ll need to do is read the collection letter carefully. Is the debt collector really looking for you, or have they accidentally sent the collection letter to the wrong address Do they clearly state whom they are and that they’re trying to collect a debt Do they give you contact information so that you can either phone them or write them in response – Make Contact – The worst thing you can do is avoid a debt collection agency, because many times, they’ll be allowed to take your silence as consent that you owe the debt. Instead, you’ll want to make contact with them and ask them for a debt validation letter. . oDebt validation letters. oLetter for removal of hard enquiries . oPay for delete letter – Letters of credit may be sent to a creditor in order to eliminate a felonious account from your report. There are certain accounts that cannot be removed even with letters of credit. . What happens after the 30 days – Once your letter is received and the 30 day period is through, you should expect to get a response from the agency. They will either provide you with verifying or validating information, or they will simply provide you with a new copy of your credit report with the necessary changes. Is there a down side – While dispute letters can be useful in getting mistakes removed from your report, they can create problems in certain situations. For example, if you dispute a debt that is still within the statute of limitations in your state, there’s a chance the party you’re disputing with can take you to court and try to get a judgment against you. . It is an agreement with the creditor by the borrower by which the creditor promises to remove the negative listing from your credit report once the debt has been paid in full. Dispute letters with the credit bureaus A dispute letter is sent to the credit bureaus if you do not agree with certain negative listings in your credit report. When you send a dispute letter to the credit bureaus, the credit bureau verifies the listing with the creditor, and if they find the listing incorrect, they remove it from your credit report. Cease and Desist Letter If you find any debt collector disturbing you continuously over phone for collection of a particular debt which you do not owe, you can send a cease and desist letter to the debt collector. .

Now that you know what a debt validation letter is use it against them and stop them in their tracks. It can be pretty scary to walk to your mailbox and find a collection letter from a debt collection agency. But the truth is, because of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, you have more power in the situation than you might think. For instance, did you know that you actually get to control how the debt collector speaks to you – even in what format What’s more, the debt collector must prove to you that the debt is really yours before they can even begin their collection efforts. . In all cases, the documentation should be clear and provide definitive proof of the collectors claim. Say Goodbye to the Collector – What happens if the collector cannot (or does not wish to) provide the documentation that you request If they can’t comply. they can’t collect, they can’t contact you, and they can’t report the collection to the credit bureaus. An Important Note – Our credit repair clients occasionally express concern that if the collector is pushed too hard they will send a summons and attempt to get a judgment. . A verified name and address will not provide the evidence that you owe money from someone after all. There is no account validation process required in a debt verification letter. The prevalent harassment in the debt collection industry would still be possible. Given that, this verification letter is not an element in learning how to dispute a debt. . Creditors can be avoided by taking advantage of the ‘federal and state debt collection laws’ which protect the consumers from offensive conduct of debt collectors. Negotiation with creditors is welcome if there is even a little income flow or, small assets that can be sold for funds. Non profit credit or, debt counseling agencies can help to design a suitable repayment plan on behalf of the distressed defaulter. One should always evaluate his or, her assets and existing bank balance while taking loans or, hoarding up on other forms of debts. .

There is a legitimate stipulation set by the laws that under this Act the creditors and collectors are compelled to certify every alleged collection with corroborative evidence when the request for validation is made. Not until the creditor or collector has completely certified your account, can they continue to collect any amount from you. Therefore a debt validation letter can protect you from the pursuing allegations of your creditor or collector. A debt validation letter is a grueling requirement on the part of your creditor or collector. . A verified name and address will not provide the evidence that you owe money from someone after all. There is no account validation process required in a debt verification letter. The prevalent harassment in the debt collection industry would still be possible. Given that, this verification letter is not an element in learning how to dispute a debt. . And if the debt collector knows that you understand your rights – and aren’t afraid to defend them in a court of law – he or she will more likely to abide by the laws that govern debt collection agencies. The Letter of the Law – The correct way to respond to a collection letter is with a written request for debt validation. This is your right under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), and if done in a timely and correct manner can produce fantastic results. Validation of debts 15 USC 1692g (b) “If the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period described in subsection (a) that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, or that the consumer requests the name and address of the original creditor, the debt collector shall cease collection of the debt, or any disputed portion thereof, until the debt collector obtains verification of the debt or any copy of a judgment, or the name and address of the original creditor, and a copy of such verification or judgment, or name and address of the original creditor, is mailed to the consumer by the debt collector. . The Outcome of Validation – Per the FDCPA, if the collector has not reported your debt to the credit bureaus they are not allowed to do so until they provide validation. And if have already reported and are unable to validate the debt they must cease collection efforts and stop reporting. Following Through – Debt validation is a powerful credit repair tool which, in most cases will produce excellent results. But you should also be aware that legal precedent defining the obligations of the collector is inconsistent. .

For the best Debt Validation Letter templates available go to Allan Henrys’ amazing site for free resources on Debt Validation Letter Sample.

Incoming search terms:
  • credit letters